feat: obtaining Focus XP via lens #551

Sainan · 2024-10-15T11:56:20-07:00

VampireKitten commented

2024-10-15 11:56:20 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Fixes #547.

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-10-15 11:56:29 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new function, addFocusXpIncreases, which updates the FocusXP property of the inventory based on an array of focus experience points. This function initializes the FocusXP object if it does not exist and increments various attributes such as AP_POWER, AP_TACTIC, AP_DEFENSE, AP_ATTACK, and AP_WARD using values from the provided array. The missionInventoryUpdate function has been modified to include an optional parameter, FocusXpIncreases, which allows it to call the new function during mission inventory updates. Additionally, the IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest interface has been updated to include the new optional property FocusXpIncreases of type number[], facilitating the inclusion of experience point increases in the mission inventory update request.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Reference `FocusXpIncreases` in `missionInventoryUpdate` (547)	✅
Ensure focus gained in mission is saved correctly (547)	✅

#550: The changes in this PR involve inventory management related to focus operations, which may connect with the enhancements made to the inventory system in the main PR, particularly regarding the handling of focus-related attributes.

Suggested reviewers

Sainan

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The changes in this pull request introduce a new function, `addFocusXpIncreases`, which updates the `FocusXP` property of the inventory based on an array of focus experience points. This function initializes the `FocusXP` object if it does not exist and increments various attributes such as `AP_POWER`, `AP_TACTIC`, `AP_DEFENSE`, `AP_ATTACK`, and `AP_WARD` using values from the provided array. The `missionInventoryUpdate` function has been modified to include an optional parameter, `FocusXpIncreases`, which allows it to call the new function during mission inventory updates. Additionally, the `IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest` interface has been updated to include the new optional property `FocusXpIncreases` of type `number[]`, facilitating the inclusion of experience point increases in the mission inventory update request. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |----------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------| | Reference `FocusXpIncreases` in `missionInventoryUpdate` (547) | ✅ | | | Ensure focus gained in mission is saved correctly (547) | ✅ | | ## Possibly related PRs - #550: The changes in this PR involve inventory management related to focus operations, which may connect with the enhancements made to the inventory system in the main PR, particularly regarding the handling of focus-related attributes. ## Suggested reviewers - Sainan         --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-15 12:03:25 -07:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)

src/types/requestTypes.ts (1)
73-73: Approved: New property addresses the Focus XP saving issue.

The addition of the FocusXpIncreases property to the IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest interface is a good solution to address the issue of Focus XP not being saved after missions. The type number[] is appropriate for storing multiple XP increases, and making it optional maintains backward compatibility.

Consider adding a brief comment above the property to explain its purpose and expected format. For example:
/** Array of Focus XP increases gained during the mission, corresponding to different Focus schools. */
FocusXpIncreases?: number[];
This would improve code readability and make it easier for other developers to understand the property's usage.
src/services/inventoryService.ts (1)
726-726: Use of nullish coalescing assignment (??=) - Check compatibility

The line inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 }; uses the nullish coalescing assignment operator (??=), which is a feature introduced in ES2021.

Ensure that your project’s TypeScript configuration target supports this operator. If not, consider using an alternative:
- inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 };
+ inventory.FocusXP = inventory.FocusXP || { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 };

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76964585eb and e53e906976.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

src/services/inventoryService.ts (2 hunks)
src/types/requestTypes.ts (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

src/services/inventoryService.ts

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

[failure] 746-746:
'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

src/services/inventoryService.ts

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

[failure] 746-746:
'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

src/services/inventoryService.ts

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

[failure] 746-746:
'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🔇 Additional comments (3)

src/types/requestTypes.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-124: Overall assessment: The change effectively addresses the Focus XP saving issue.

The addition of the FocusXpIncreases property to the IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest interface is a targeted and appropriate solution to the problem of Focus XP not being saved after missions. This change aligns well with the PR objectives and the linked issue #547.

The implementation is minimal and doesn't introduce any unnecessary complexity. It maintains backward compatibility by making the new property optional, which is a good practice.

To ensure that this change is properly utilized, we should verify that the missionInventoryUpdateService.ts file (mentioned in the linked issue) has been updated to use this new property. Run the following script to check for its usage:

If the script doesn't find any matches, it might indicate that additional changes are needed to fully implement the Focus XP saving functionality.
src/services/inventoryService.ts (2)
724-733: ⚠️ Potential issue

Potential off-by-one error in 'focusXpPlus' indices

In the addFocusXpIncreases function, the array focusXpPlus is accessed using indices [1], [2], [3], [4], and [7]. Since arrays in JavaScript are zero-indexed, this skips focusXpPlus[0] and leaves gaps between indices 4 and 7.

Verify that the indices correspond correctly to the intended Focus schools. If certain indices are intentionally omitted, consider adding comments to clarify. Otherwise, adjust the indices to match the correct positions in the array.

If focusXpPlus[0], [5], and [6] should be included, update the code as follows:
@@ -727,7 +727,10 @@ const addFocusXpIncreases = (inventory: IInventoryDatabaseDocument, focusXpPlus:
         inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 };
-        inventory.FocusXP.AP_ATTACK += focusXpPlus[1];
-        inventory.FocusXP.AP_DEFENSE += focusXpPlus[2];
-        inventory.FocusXP.AP_TACTIC += focusXpPlus[3];
-        inventory.FocusXP.AP_POWER += focusXpPlus[4];
-        inventory.FocusXP.AP_WARD += focusXpPlus[7];
+        inventory.FocusXP.AP_ATTACK += focusXpPlus[0];
+        inventory.FocusXP.AP_DEFENSE += focusXpPlus[1];
+        inventory.FocusXP.AP_TACTIC += focusXpPlus[2];
+        inventory.FocusXP.AP_POWER += focusXpPlus[3];
+        inventory.FocusXP.AP_WARD += focusXpPlus[4];
You can verify the contents and structure of focusXpPlus with the following script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the structure of 'focusXpPlus' in incoming data

# Search for usages of 'FocusXpIncreases' to understand its structure
rg --type ts 'FocusXpIncreases'
Ensure that the indices used align with the data structure of focusXpPlus.

🧰 Tools

🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

724-733: ⚠️ Potential issue

Unused function 'addFocusXpIncreases'

The function addFocusXpIncreases is defined but never called within the codebase. This means that the focus XP increases are not being processed and saved, which contradicts the PR objective of saving Focus gained during missions.

To fix this, you should call addFocusXpIncreases within the missionInventoryUpdate function where appropriate. Here's how you can modify the code:
@@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest
     addFusionTreasures(inventory, FusionTreasures);
     if (Missions) {
         addMissionComplete(inventory, Missions);
     }

+    addFocusXpIncreases(inventory, FocusXpIncreases);
+
     const changedInventory = await inventory.save();
     return changedInventory.toJSON();
 };
You can verify that addFocusXpIncreases is not being called anywhere with the following script:

If this script returns no results, it confirms that addFocusXpIncreases is not being used.

✅ Verification successful

Unused function 'addFocusXpIncreases' Confirmed

The function addFocusXpIncreases is not called anywhere else in the codebase. To ensure that focus XP increases are processed and saved correctly, please integrate the function within the missionInventoryUpdate function as suggested.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'addFocusXpIncreases' is called in the codebase

# Search for calls to 'addFocusXpIncreases', excluding its definition
rg --type ts 'addFocusXpIncreases' --files-with-matches | grep -v 'inventoryService.ts'
Length of output: 383

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'addFocusXpIncreases' is called in the codebase outside its definition

# Search for function calls to 'addFocusXpIncreases' excluding its definition in 'inventoryService.ts'
rg --type ts "addFocusXpIncreases\\s*\\(" | grep -v 'inventoryService.ts'
Length of output: 71
🧰 Tools

🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[failure] 724-724:
'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

**Actionable comments posted: 1** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/types/requestTypes.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `73-73`: **Approved: New property addresses the Focus XP saving issue.** The addition of the `FocusXpIncreases` property to the `IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest` interface is a good solution to address the issue of Focus XP not being saved after missions. The type `number[]` is appropriate for storing multiple XP increases, and making it optional maintains backward compatibility. Consider adding a brief comment above the property to explain its purpose and expected format. For example: ```typescript /** Array of Focus XP increases gained during the mission, corresponding to different Focus schools. */ FocusXpIncreases?: number[]; ``` This would improve code readability and make it easier for other developers to understand the property's usage. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/services/inventoryService.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `726-726`: **Use of nullish coalescing assignment (??=) - Check compatibility** The line `inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 };` uses the nullish coalescing assignment operator (`??=`), which is a feature introduced in ES2021. Ensure that your project’s TypeScript configuration target supports this operator. If not, consider using an alternative: ```diff - inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 }; + inventory.FocusXP = inventory.FocusXP || { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 }; ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76964585ebd5145dc8c86bdd1075c40d23e48859 and e53e906976fcf3b18f9a6df748b23f76ec9f8597. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary> * src/services/inventoryService.ts (2 hunks) * src/types/requestTypes.ts (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/services/inventoryService.ts</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used --- [failure] 746-746: 'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/services/inventoryService.ts</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used --- [failure] 746-746: 'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/services/inventoryService.ts</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used --- [failure] 746-746: 'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (3)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/types/requestTypes.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> Line range hint `1-124`: **Overall assessment: The change effectively addresses the Focus XP saving issue.** The addition of the `FocusXpIncreases` property to the `IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest` interface is a targeted and appropriate solution to the problem of Focus XP not being saved after missions. This change aligns well with the PR objectives and the linked issue #547. The implementation is minimal and doesn't introduce any unnecessary complexity. It maintains backward compatibility by making the new property optional, which is a good practice. To ensure that this change is properly utilized, we should verify that the `missionInventoryUpdateService.ts` file (mentioned in the linked issue) has been updated to use this new property. Run the following script to check for its usage: If the script doesn't find any matches, it might indicate that additional changes are needed to fully implement the Focus XP saving functionality. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/services/inventoryService.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `724-733`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Potential off-by-one error in 'focusXpPlus' indices** In the `addFocusXpIncreases` function, the array `focusXpPlus` is accessed using indices `[1]`, `[2]`, `[3]`, `[4]`, and `[7]`. Since arrays in JavaScript are zero-indexed, this skips `focusXpPlus[0]` and leaves gaps between indices `4` and `7`. Verify that the indices correspond correctly to the intended Focus schools. If certain indices are intentionally omitted, consider adding comments to clarify. Otherwise, adjust the indices to match the correct positions in the array. If `focusXpPlus[0]`, `[5]`, and `[6]` should be included, update the code as follows: ```diff @@ -727,7 +727,10 @@ const addFocusXpIncreases = (inventory: IInventoryDatabaseDocument, focusXpPlus: inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 }; - inventory.FocusXP.AP_ATTACK += focusXpPlus[1]; - inventory.FocusXP.AP_DEFENSE += focusXpPlus[2]; - inventory.FocusXP.AP_TACTIC += focusXpPlus[3]; - inventory.FocusXP.AP_POWER += focusXpPlus[4]; - inventory.FocusXP.AP_WARD += focusXpPlus[7]; + inventory.FocusXP.AP_ATTACK += focusXpPlus[0]; + inventory.FocusXP.AP_DEFENSE += focusXpPlus[1]; + inventory.FocusXP.AP_TACTIC += focusXpPlus[2]; + inventory.FocusXP.AP_POWER += focusXpPlus[3]; + inventory.FocusXP.AP_WARD += focusXpPlus[4]; ``` You can verify the contents and structure of `focusXpPlus` with the following script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check the structure of 'focusXpPlus' in incoming data # Search for usages of 'FocusXpIncreases' to understand its structure rg --type ts 'FocusXpIncreases' ``` Ensure that the indices used align with the data structure of `focusXpPlus`. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> </details> --- `724-733`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Unused function 'addFocusXpIncreases'** The function `addFocusXpIncreases` is defined but never called within the codebase. This means that the focus XP increases are not being processed and saved, which contradicts the PR objective of saving Focus gained during missions. To fix this, you should call `addFocusXpIncreases` within the `missionInventoryUpdate` function where appropriate. Here's how you can modify the code: ```diff @@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest addFusionTreasures(inventory, FusionTreasures); if (Missions) { addMissionComplete(inventory, Missions); } + addFocusXpIncreases(inventory, FocusXpIncreases); + const changedInventory = await inventory.save(); return changedInventory.toJSON(); }; ``` You can verify that `addFocusXpIncreases` is not being called anywhere with the following script: If this script returns no results, it confirms that `addFocusXpIncreases` is not being used. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>  **Unused function 'addFocusXpIncreases' Confirmed** The function `addFocusXpIncreases` is not called anywhere else in the codebase. To ensure that focus XP increases are processed and saved correctly, please integrate the function within the `missionInventoryUpdate` function as suggested. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if 'addFocusXpIncreases' is called in the codebase # Search for calls to 'addFocusXpIncreases', excluding its definition rg --type ts 'addFocusXpIncreases' --files-with-matches | grep -v 'inventoryService.ts' ``` Length of output: 383 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if 'addFocusXpIncreases' is called in the codebase outside its definition # Search for function calls to 'addFocusXpIncreases' excluding its definition in 'inventoryService.ts' rg --type ts "addFocusXpIncreases\\s*\\(" | grep -v 'inventoryService.ts' ``` Length of output: 71 </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 724-724: 'addFocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details>

src/services/inventoryService.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-15 12:03:24 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Unused variable 'FocusXpIncreases'

The variable FocusXpIncreases is destructured from data but not utilized within the missionInventoryUpdate function. This means that any Focus XP increases sent to this function are ignored.

Ensure that FocusXpIncreases is used to update the inventory by calling addFocusXpIncreases. Apply the following changes:

@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest
     Recipes,
     Missions,
     FusionTreasures,
-    FocusXpIncreases
+    FocusXpIncreases
 } = data;
 const inventory = await getInventory(accountId);

@@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest
     addFusionTreasures(inventory, FusionTreasures);
     if (Missions) {
         addMissionComplete(inventory, Missions);
     }

+    addFocusXpIncreases(inventory, FocusXpIncreases);
+
     const changedInventory = await inventory.save();
     return changedInventory.toJSON();
 };

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

🧰 Tools

🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[failure] 746-746:
'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[failure] 746-746:
'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[failure] 746-746:
'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Unused variable 'FocusXpIncreases'** The variable `FocusXpIncreases` is destructured from `data` but not utilized within the `missionInventoryUpdate` function. This means that any Focus XP increases sent to this function are ignored. Ensure that `FocusXpIncreases` is used to update the inventory by calling `addFocusXpIncreases`. Apply the following changes: ```diff @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest Recipes, Missions, FusionTreasures, - FocusXpIncreases + FocusXpIncreases } = data; const inventory = await getInventory(accountId); @@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest addFusionTreasures(inventory, FusionTreasures); if (Missions) { addMissionComplete(inventory, Missions); } + addFocusXpIncreases(inventory, FocusXpIncreases); + const changedInventory = await inventory.save(); return changedInventory.toJSON(); }; ``` > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 746-746: 'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 746-746: 'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> [failure] 746-746: 'FocusXpIncreases' is assigned a value but never used </blockquote></details> </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-15 12:07:16 -07:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)

src/services/inventoryService.ts (2)
745-746: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for consistency.

The changes successfully address the issue of Focus XP not being saved after missions. The FocusXpIncreases parameter has been added to the function signature, and the addFocusXpIncreases function is called appropriately.

For consistency with other parameters, consider moving the FocusXpIncreases destructuring to a separate line:
export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest, accountId: string) => {
    const {
        RawUpgrades,
        MiscItems,
        RegularCredits,
        ChallengeProgress,
        FusionPoints,
        Consumables,
        Recipes,
        Missions,
        FusionTreasures,
    } = data;
    const { FocusXpIncreases } = data;
    // ... rest of the function
This change would improve readability and maintain consistency with how other parameters are handled.

Also applies to: 808-808

724-733: Summary: Successfully implemented Focus XP saving feature

The changes in this file successfully address the issue of Focus XP not being saved after missions (issue #547). The implementation includes:

A new addFocusXpIncreases function to update the FocusXP property of the inventory.

Updates to the missionInventoryUpdate function to include FocusXpIncreases in its parameters and call the new function.

These changes effectively solve the problem while maintaining the overall structure of the inventory service. The implementation is correct, although there are some minor suggestions for improvement in the previous comments.

Consider adding unit tests for the new addFocusXpIncreases function and integration tests for the updated missionInventoryUpdate function to ensure the new feature works as expected and to prevent future regressions.

Also applies to: 745-746, 808-808

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e53e906976 and fbc76e7425.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/services/inventoryService.ts (3 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

**Actionable comments posted: 1** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/services/inventoryService.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `745-746`: **LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for consistency.** The changes successfully address the issue of Focus XP not being saved after missions. The `FocusXpIncreases` parameter has been added to the function signature, and the `addFocusXpIncreases` function is called appropriately. For consistency with other parameters, consider moving the `FocusXpIncreases` destructuring to a separate line: ```typescript export const missionInventoryUpdate = async (data: IMissionInventoryUpdateRequest, accountId: string) => { const { RawUpgrades, MiscItems, RegularCredits, ChallengeProgress, FusionPoints, Consumables, Recipes, Missions, FusionTreasures, } = data; const { FocusXpIncreases } = data; // ... rest of the function ``` This change would improve readability and maintain consistency with how other parameters are handled. Also applies to: 808-808 --- `724-733`: **Summary: Successfully implemented Focus XP saving feature** The changes in this file successfully address the issue of Focus XP not being saved after missions (issue #547). The implementation includes: 1. A new `addFocusXpIncreases` function to update the `FocusXP` property of the inventory. 2. Updates to the `missionInventoryUpdate` function to include `FocusXpIncreases` in its parameters and call the new function. These changes effectively solve the problem while maintaining the overall structure of the inventory service. The implementation is correct, although there are some minor suggestions for improvement in the previous comments. Consider adding unit tests for the new `addFocusXpIncreases` function and integration tests for the updated `missionInventoryUpdate` function to ensure the new feature works as expected and to prevent future regressions. Also applies to: 745-746, 808-808 </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e53e906976fcf3b18f9a6df748b23f76ec9f8597 and fbc76e7425037d3ac76445c290908175eab08f6f. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * src/services/inventoryService.ts (3 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> </details> </details>

src/services/inventoryService.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-15 12:07:15 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider improving robustness and readability of the addFocusXpIncreases function.

The function logic is correct, but there are a few areas for improvement:

The indexing of focusXpPlus (1, 2, 3, 4, 7) seems unusual and might be error-prone. Consider using named constants or an enum for better readability and maintainability.
There's no error handling for cases where focusXpPlus might have fewer than 8 elements. Add a check to ensure the array has the expected length.
For better type safety, consider using a more specific type for focusXpPlus instead of number[] | undefined.

Here's a suggested refactoring:

enum FocusType {
  AP_ATTACK = 1,
  AP_DEFENSE = 2,
  AP_TACTIC = 3,
  AP_POWER = 4,
  AP_WARD = 7
}

const addFocusXpIncreases = (inventory: IInventoryDatabaseDocument, focusXpPlus: number[] | undefined) => {
  if (focusXpPlus && focusXpPlus.length >= 8) {
    inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 };
    inventory.FocusXP.AP_ATTACK += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_ATTACK];
    inventory.FocusXP.AP_DEFENSE += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_DEFENSE];
    inventory.FocusXP.AP_TACTIC += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_TACTIC];
    inventory.FocusXP.AP_POWER += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_POWER];
    inventory.FocusXP.AP_WARD += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_WARD];
  } else if (focusXpPlus) {
    console.warn('Invalid focusXpPlus array length');
  }
};

This refactoring improves readability, type safety, and adds basic error handling.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider improving robustness and readability of the `addFocusXpIncreases` function.** The function logic is correct, but there are a few areas for improvement: 1. The indexing of `focusXpPlus` (1, 2, 3, 4, 7) seems unusual and might be error-prone. Consider using named constants or an enum for better readability and maintainability. 2. There's no error handling for cases where `focusXpPlus` might have fewer than 8 elements. Add a check to ensure the array has the expected length. 3. For better type safety, consider using a more specific type for `focusXpPlus` instead of `number[] | undefined`. Here's a suggested refactoring: ```typescript enum FocusType { AP_ATTACK = 1, AP_DEFENSE = 2, AP_TACTIC = 3, AP_POWER = 4, AP_WARD = 7 } const addFocusXpIncreases = (inventory: IInventoryDatabaseDocument, focusXpPlus: number[] | undefined) => { if (focusXpPlus && focusXpPlus.length >= 8) { inventory.FocusXP ??= { AP_POWER: 0, AP_TACTIC: 0, AP_DEFENSE: 0, AP_ATTACK: 0, AP_WARD: 0 }; inventory.FocusXP.AP_ATTACK += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_ATTACK]; inventory.FocusXP.AP_DEFENSE += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_DEFENSE]; inventory.FocusXP.AP_TACTIC += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_TACTIC]; inventory.FocusXP.AP_POWER += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_POWER]; inventory.FocusXP.AP_WARD += focusXpPlus[FocusType.AP_WARD]; } else if (focusXpPlus) { console.warn('Invalid focusXpPlus array length'); } }; ``` This refactoring improves readability, type safety, and adds basic error handling.

Sainan reviewed 2024-10-15 12:09:40 -07:00

src/services/inventoryService.ts

Sainan commented

2024-10-15 12:09:40 -07:00

Hey dimwit, the full enum should look like this:

enum ArtifactPolarity {
    AP_UNIVERSAL,
    AP_ATTACK,
    AP_DEFENSE,
    AP_TACTIC,
    AP_POWER,
    AP_PRECEPT,
    AP_FUSION,
    AP_WARD,
    AP_UMBRA,
    AP_ANY
};

Hey dimwit, the full enum should look like this: ```c enum ArtifactPolarity { AP_UNIVERSAL, AP_ATTACK, AP_DEFENSE, AP_TACTIC, AP_POWER, AP_PRECEPT, AP_FUSION, AP_WARD, AP_UMBRA, AP_ANY }; ```

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-15 12:10:06 -07:00

src/services/inventoryService.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-15 12:10:06 -07:00

@Sainan, thank you for providing the full enum definition. I'll incorporate this in future suggestions.

(⋟﹏⋞)

✏️ Learnings added

Learnt from: Sainan
PR: spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer#551
File: src/services/inventoryService.ts:724-733
Timestamp: 2024-10-15T19:10:05.168Z
Learning: The full enum for ArtifactPolarity is:
```c
enum ArtifactPolarity {
    AP_UNIVERSAL,
    AP_ATTACK,
    AP_DEFENSE,
    AP_TACTIC,
    AP_POWER,
    AP_PRECEPT,
    AP_FUSION,
    AP_WARD,
    AP_UMBRA,
    AP_ANY
};


> Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure [review instructions](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/review-instructions). You can manage existing learnings in the [app](https://app.coderabbit.ai/learnings).

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->

@Sainan, thank you for providing the full enum definition. I'll incorporate this in future suggestions. (⋟﹏⋞) --- <details> <summary>✏️ Learnings added</summary> ``` Learnt from: Sainan PR: spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer#551 File: src/services/inventoryService.ts:724-733 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T19:10:05.168Z Learning: The full enum for ArtifactPolarity is: ```c enum ArtifactPolarity { AP_UNIVERSAL, AP_ATTACK, AP_DEFENSE, AP_TACTIC, AP_POWER, AP_PRECEPT, AP_FUSION, AP_WARD, AP_UMBRA, AP_ANY }; ``` ``` > Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure [review instructions](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/review-instructions). You can manage existing learnings in the [app](https://app.coderabbit.ai/learnings). </details>

Sainan approved these changes 2024-10-15 12:21:52 -07:00

Pull request closed

This pull request cannot be reopened because the branch was deleted.

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#551