fix(webui): properly handle unique level caps #837

Sainan · 2025-01-20T03:40:55-08:00

Sainan commented

2025-01-20 03:40:55 -08:00

Fixes #833

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2025-01-20 03:41:04 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Sainan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd5f501d26 and 8b61ff4334.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

static/webui/script.js (3 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to both the backend controller (getItemListsController.ts) and the frontend JavaScript (script.js) to support dynamic level caps for different item types. A new import ExportMisc from the warframe-public-export-plus module is added to the controller, which now includes uniqueLevelCaps in the response. On the client-side, a new uniqueLevelCaps variable is created to store these level caps, and the updateInventory function is modified to dynamically calculate maximum experience points based on the received data. If no specific level cap is defined for an item type, a default value of 30 is used, with special handling for certain categories.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Correct max ranking for items [#833]	✅
Prevent incorrect ranking options	✅

The changes directly address the issue by implementing a dynamic mechanism to determine level caps, ensuring that items are not incorrectly given ranking options beyond their appropriate levels. The implementation provides flexibility by using a configurable uniqueLevelCaps object and falling back to a default of 30 when no specific cap is defined.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

> [!WARNING] > ## Rate limit exceeded > > @Sainan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait **2 minutes and 15 seconds** before requesting another review. > > <details> > <summary>⌛ How to resolve this issue?</summary> > > After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. > > We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. > > </details> > > > <details> > <summary>🚦 How do rate limits work?</summary> > > CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. > > Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. > > Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information. > > </details> > > <details> > <summary>📥 Commits</summary> > > Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd5f501d26f22ae4ef0bdf48ed50b76171956ab7 and 8b61ff4334cc5315d49a2f3d909fec51b4ca055a. > > </details> > > <details> > <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> > > * `static/webui/script.js` (3 hunks) > > </details>   ## Walkthrough The pull request introduces changes to both the backend controller (`getItemListsController.ts`) and the frontend JavaScript (`script.js`) to support dynamic level caps for different item types. A new import `ExportMisc` from the `warframe-public-export-plus` module is added to the controller, which now includes `uniqueLevelCaps` in the response. On the client-side, a new `uniqueLevelCaps` variable is created to store these level caps, and the `updateInventory` function is modified to dynamically calculate maximum experience points based on the received data. If no specific level cap is defined for an item type, a default value of 30 is used, with special handling for certain categories. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Correct max ranking for items [#833] | ✅ | | | Prevent incorrect ranking options | ✅ | | The changes directly address the issue by implementing a dynamic mechanism to determine level caps, ensuring that items are not incorrectly given ranking options beyond their appropriate levels. The implementation provides flexibility by using a configurable `uniqueLevelCaps` object and falling back to a default of 30 when no specific cap is defined.      --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2025-01-20 03:42:19 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

static/webui/script.js (1)
242-251: Fix the formatting of the closing parenthesis.

The logic for category-based maxXP adjustment is correct, but there's a minor formatting issue.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
-            )
-            {
+            ) {
🧰 Tools

🪛 eslint

[error] 248-249: Replace ····)⏎······················· with )

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bb857a17a and cd5f501d26.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

src/controllers/custom/getItemListsController.ts (2 hunks)
static/webui/script.js (3 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 eslint

static/webui/script.js

[error] 248-249: Replace ····)⏎······················· with )

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

src/controllers/custom/getItemListsController.ts (2)

7-7: LGTM!

The import of ExportMisc is correctly added to the existing imports from the warframe-public-export-plus module.

167-167: LGTM!

The response object is correctly updated to include uniqueLevelCaps from ExportMisc, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing unique level caps handling.

static/webui/script.js (2)

129-129: LGTM!

The uniqueLevelCaps variable is correctly declared and populated from the server response in the fetchItemList function.

Also applies to: 171-172

241-241: LGTM!

The maxXP calculation is correctly updated to use dynamic level caps from uniqueLevelCaps with a sensible default of 30.

**Actionable comments posted: 0** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>static/webui/script.js (1)</summary><blockquote> `242-251`: **Fix the formatting of the closing parenthesis.** The logic for category-based maxXP adjustment is correct, but there's a minor formatting issue. Apply this diff to fix the formatting: ```diff - ) - { + ) { ``` <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 eslint</summary> [error] 248-249: Replace `····)⏎·······················` with `)` (prettier/prettier) </details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bb857a17a8e32d0374d8d50c87cd2f8b7406bfe and cd5f501d26f22ae4ef0bdf48ed50b76171956ab7. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary> * `src/controllers/custom/getItemListsController.ts` (2 hunks) * `static/webui/script.js` (3 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 eslint</summary> <details> <summary>static/webui/script.js</summary> [error] 248-249: Replace `····)⏎·······················` with `)` (prettier/prettier) </details> </details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (4)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/custom/getItemListsController.ts (2)</summary> `7-7`: **LGTM!** The import of `ExportMisc` is correctly added to the existing imports from the `warframe-public-export-plus` module. --- `167-167`: **LGTM!** The response object is correctly updated to include `uniqueLevelCaps` from `ExportMisc`, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing unique level caps handling. </details> <details> <summary>static/webui/script.js (2)</summary> `129-129`: **LGTM!** The `uniqueLevelCaps` variable is correctly declared and populated from the server response in the `fetchItemList` function. Also applies to: 171-172 --- `241-241`: **LGTM!** The maxXP calculation is correctly updated to use dynamic level caps from `uniqueLevelCaps` with a sensible default of 30. </details> </blockquote></details> </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#837