feat(webui): mod count #830

2025-01-19T18:55:02-08:00

AMelonInsideLemon commented

2025-01-19 18:55:02 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Closes #827

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2025-01-19 18:55:09 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new feature in the web user interface that allows users to specify the quantity of mods they want to acquire. This is implemented through two key changes: first, adding a new input field in the index.html file that enables users to enter a number representing the count of mods, and second, modifying the script.js file to dynamically retrieve and use this count when acquiring mods. The changes are focused on enhancing the user's ability to add multiple mods in a single action, providing more flexibility in the mod acquisition process.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Allow specifying item count when adding mods [#827]	✅
Remove limitation of adding only 1 mod at a time [#827]	✅

Finishing Touches

📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The pull request introduces a new feature in the web user interface that allows users to specify the quantity of mods they want to acquire. This is implemented through two key changes: first, adding a new input field in the `index.html` file that enables users to enter a number representing the count of mods, and second, modifying the `script.js` file to dynamically retrieve and use this count when acquiring mods. The changes are focused on enhancing the user's ability to add multiple mods in a single action, providing more flexibility in the mod acquisition process. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Allow specifying item count when adding mods [#827] | ✅ | | | Remove limitation of adding only 1 mod at a time [#827] | ✅ | |      ## Finishing Touches - [ ]  📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)   --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2025-01-19 18:56:05 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

static/webui/index.html (1)
334-334: Add accessibility improvements and input validation.

Add a label or aria-label for screen reader accessibility

Consider adding a reasonable max value to prevent excessive mod counts
-<input class="form-control" id="mod-count" type="number" min="1" value="1"/>
+<input class="form-control" id="mod-count" type="number" min="1" max="999" value="1" aria-label="Number of mods to add"/>

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b19fda66a2 and 1bf1bdb07d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

static/webui/index.html (1 hunks)
static/webui/script.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 eslint

static/webui/script.js

[error] 842-842: '$' is not defined.

(no-undef)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

static/webui/script.js (1)

842-842: LGTM! The mod count integration looks good.

The change correctly retrieves and parses the mod count from the input field.

🧰 Tools

🪛 eslint

[error] 842-842: '$' is not defined.

(no-undef)

**Actionable comments posted: 0** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>static/webui/index.html (1)</summary><blockquote> `334-334`: **Add accessibility improvements and input validation.** 1. Add a label or aria-label for screen reader accessibility 2. Consider adding a reasonable max value to prevent excessive mod counts ```diff -<input class="form-control" id="mod-count" type="number" min="1" value="1"/> +<input class="form-control" id="mod-count" type="number" min="1" max="999" value="1" aria-label="Number of mods to add"/> ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b19fda66a2ede1ff1450f869d642da3f78f0648c and 1bf1bdb07d2505dce29214a652c717771a59e5cf. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary> * `static/webui/index.html` (1 hunks) * `static/webui/script.js` (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 eslint</summary> <details> <summary>static/webui/script.js</summary> [error] 842-842: '$' is not defined. (no-undef) </details> </details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>static/webui/script.js (1)</summary> `842-842`: **LGTM! The mod count integration looks good.** The change correctly retrieves and parses the mod count from the input field. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 eslint</summary> [error] 842-842: '$' is not defined. (no-undef) </details> </details> </details> </blockquote></details> </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#830