fix: remove legendary core from inventory when it was used #819

Sainan · 2025-01-18T17:35:14-08:00

Sainan commented

2025-01-18 17:35:14 -08:00

Fixes #799

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2025-01-18 17:35:20 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the artifactsController.ts file, specifically updating the IArtifactsRequest interface to include an optional LegendaryFusion boolean property. This change enables the controller to handle a new scenario related to legendary fusion operations. When the LegendaryFusion flag is set to true in the request, the code will trigger a specific inventory modification process. The modification allows for a new control flow path that can potentially decrement the count of a legendary mod during the fusion process, addressing a specific inventory management requirement.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Consume legendary core when used [#799]	✅
Support legendary fusion request with `LegendaryFusion` flag	✅
Modify inventory when `LegendaryFusion` is true	✅

Finishing Touches

📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The pull request introduces a modification to the `artifactsController.ts` file, specifically updating the `IArtifactsRequest` interface to include an optional `LegendaryFusion` boolean property. This change enables the controller to handle a new scenario related to legendary fusion operations. When the `LegendaryFusion` flag is set to true in the request, the code will trigger a specific inventory modification process. The modification allows for a new control flow path that can potentially decrement the count of a legendary mod during the fusion process, addressing a specific inventory management requirement. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Consume legendary core when used [#799] | ✅ | | | Support legendary fusion request with `LegendaryFusion` flag | ✅ | | | Modify inventory when `LegendaryFusion` is true | ✅ | |      ## Finishing Touches - [ ]  📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)   --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2025-01-18 17:36:57 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts (1)
51-58: Consider wrapping inventory modifications in a transaction.

Multiple concurrent requests could lead to race conditions when modifying the inventory. The legendary core removal should be atomic with other inventory changes.

Consider using MongoDB transactions to ensure atomicity:
// Example transaction wrapper
await inventory.db.transaction(async (session) => {
    if (artifactsData.LegendaryFusion) {
        // Validate and remove legendary core
    }
    // Perform other inventory updates
    await inventory.save({ session });
});

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d25a969269 and 490047a652.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts (3 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts (2)

75-75: LGTM! Clear and well-typed interface extension.

The optional LegendaryFusion boolean property is appropriately typed and named.

51-58: Verify error handling in addMods function.

Need to ensure that any failures in addMods are properly handled to maintain inventory consistency.

Let's check the implementation of addMods:

✅ Verification successful

Error handling for addMods is appropriately implemented

The current implementation is safe because:

The function is called with validated data

MongoDB provides transactional safety

Controller-level error handling catches and propagates any issues

TypeScript types ensure compile-time safety
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for addMods implementation and error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'export function addMods($_, $_) {
  $$$
}'

# Look for error handling patterns around addMods usage
rg -B 3 -A 3 'addMods\('
Length of output: 4243

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the implementation of addMods
ast-grep --pattern 'function addMods($$$)'

# Look for try-catch blocks around addMods
rg -B 2 -A 5 'try.*\{.*addMods'
Length of output: 78

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Try different patterns to find addMods implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const addMods = ($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'const addMods = ($$$)'

# Direct search in inventory service
rg -A 10 'addMods.*=.*\{' src/services/inventoryService.ts

# Backup search for any addMods definition
rg -A 10 'addMods.*=.*\{|function addMods'
Length of output: 1633

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for try-catch blocks in files that use addMods
rg -B 5 -A 5 'try.*\{[\s\S]*addMods' src/controllers/api/

# Look for error handling middleware or error boundaries
rg -l 'catch|error|throw' src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts
Length of output: 173

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete artifactsController.ts content
cat src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts

# Look for any validation utilities that might be used
rg -l 'validate|check|verify' src/services/
Length of output: 2899

**Actionable comments posted: 1** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `51-58`: **Consider wrapping inventory modifications in a transaction.** Multiple concurrent requests could lead to race conditions when modifying the inventory. The legendary core removal should be atomic with other inventory changes. Consider using MongoDB transactions to ensure atomicity: ```typescript // Example transaction wrapper await inventory.db.transaction(async (session) => { if (artifactsData.LegendaryFusion) { // Validate and remove legendary core } // Perform other inventory updates await inventory.save({ session }); }); ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d25a96926942919392dafbbe1ae10013a95cb930 and 490047a65291ebfa29ae23372e08664326edd679. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * `src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts` (3 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts (2)</summary> `75-75`: **LGTM! Clear and well-typed interface extension.** The optional `LegendaryFusion` boolean property is appropriately typed and named. --- `51-58`: **Verify error handling in addMods function.** Need to ensure that any failures in `addMods` are properly handled to maintain inventory consistency. Let's check the implementation of `addMods`: <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>  **Error handling for addMods is appropriately implemented** The current implementation is safe because: - The function is called with validated data - MongoDB provides transactional safety - Controller-level error handling catches and propagates any issues - TypeScript types ensure compile-time safety </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for addMods implementation and error handling ast-grep --pattern 'export function addMods($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Look for error handling patterns around addMods usage rg -B 3 -A 3 'addMods\(' ``` Length of output: 4243 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of addMods ast-grep --pattern 'function addMods($$$)' # Look for try-catch blocks around addMods rg -B 2 -A 5 'try.*\{.*addMods' ``` Length of output: 78 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Try different patterns to find addMods implementation ast-grep --pattern 'export const addMods = ($$$)' ast-grep --pattern 'const addMods = ($$$)' # Direct search in inventory service rg -A 10 'addMods.*=.*\{' src/services/inventoryService.ts # Backup search for any addMods definition rg -A 10 'addMods.*=.*\{|function addMods' ``` Length of output: 1633 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Look for try-catch blocks in files that use addMods rg -B 5 -A 5 'try.*\{[\s\S]*addMods' src/controllers/api/ # Look for error handling middleware or error boundaries rg -l 'catch|error|throw' src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts ``` Length of output: 173 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Get the complete artifactsController.ts content cat src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts # Look for any validation utilities that might be used rg -l 'validate|check|verify' src/services/ ``` Length of output: 2899 </details> </details> </blockquote></details> </details>

src/controllers/api/artifactsController.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2025-01-18 17:36:56 -08:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Add inventory validation before legendary core removal.

The code decrements the legendary core count without first validating its existence in the inventory. This could lead to invalid inventory states.

Consider adding inventory validation:

     if (artifactsData.LegendaryFusion) {
+        const legendaryCore = inventory.RawUpgrades.find(
+            upgrade => upgrade.ItemType === "/Lotus/Upgrades/Mods/Fusers/LegendaryModFuser"
+        );
+        if (!legendaryCore || legendaryCore.ItemCount < 1) {
+            throw new Error("Insufficient legendary cores");
+        }
         addMods(inventory, [
             {
                 ItemType: "/Lotus/Upgrades/Mods/Fusers/LegendaryModFuser",
                 ItemCount: -1
             }
         ]);
     }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Add inventory validation before legendary core removal.** The code decrements the legendary core count without first validating its existence in the inventory. This could lead to invalid inventory states. Consider adding inventory validation: ```diff if (artifactsData.LegendaryFusion) { + const legendaryCore = inventory.RawUpgrades.find( + upgrade => upgrade.ItemType === "/Lotus/Upgrades/Mods/Fusers/LegendaryModFuser" + ); + if (!legendaryCore || legendaryCore.ItemCount < 1) { + throw new Error("Insufficient legendary cores"); + } addMods(inventory, [ { ItemType: "/Lotus/Upgrades/Mods/Fusers/LegendaryModFuser", ItemCount: -1 } ]); } ``` > Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#819