feat: changing equipped shawzin/instrument #762

Sainan · 2025-01-10T23:12:51-08:00

Sainan commented

2025-01-10 23:12:51 -08:00

No description provided.

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2025-01-10 23:12:57 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new feature for setting an equipped instrument in the application. A new controller function setEquippedInstrumentController has been created to handle the process of updating a user's equipped instrument. This is accompanied by the addition of a new API route in src/routes/api.ts that enables clients to send POST requests to /setEquippedInstrument.php.

Simultaneously, the IInventoryDatabase and IInventoryResponse interfaces in src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts have been modified. These changes involve updating the types of several properties, including making the EquippedInstrument property optional and changing the representation of certain database-related fields like TrainingDate, LoadOutPresets, Mailbox, and GuildId.

The modifications appear to be part of a broader effort to refine the application's inventory management and type system.

Finishing Touches

📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The pull request introduces a new feature for setting an equipped instrument in the application. A new controller function `setEquippedInstrumentController` has been created to handle the process of updating a user's equipped instrument. This is accompanied by the addition of a new API route in `src/routes/api.ts` that enables clients to send POST requests to `/setEquippedInstrument.php`. Simultaneously, the `IInventoryDatabase` and `IInventoryResponse` interfaces in `src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts` have been modified. These changes involve updating the types of several properties, including making the `EquippedInstrument` property optional and changing the representation of certain database-related fields like `TrainingDate`, `LoadOutPresets`, `Mailbox`, and `GuildId`. The modifications appear to be part of a broader effort to refine the application's inventory management and type system.      ## Finishing Touches - [ ]  📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)   --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2025-01-10 23:14:31 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/controllers/api/setEquippedInstrumentController.ts (1)
15-17: Document the interface.

Add JSDoc comments to document the interface and its property.

Apply this diff to add documentation:
+/**
+ * Interface for the request body when setting an equipped instrument
+ */
 interface ISetEquippedInstrumentRequest {
+    /** The identifier of the instrument to equip */
     Instrument: string;
 }

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb8e19403e and f9bc1eb22f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

src/controllers/api/setEquippedInstrumentController.ts (1 hunks)
src/routes/api.ts (2 hunks)
src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/routes/api.ts (1)

59-59: LGTM!

The changes follow the established patterns in the codebase:

Controller import is properly grouped with other imports

Route registration follows the same pattern as other POST routes

Also applies to: 145-145

**Actionable comments posted: 2** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/setEquippedInstrumentController.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `15-17`: **Document the interface.** Add JSDoc comments to document the interface and its property. Apply this diff to add documentation: ```diff +/** + * Interface for the request body when setting an equipped instrument + */ interface ISetEquippedInstrumentRequest { + /** The identifier of the instrument to equip */ Instrument: string; } ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb8e19403e9e54e1aee815704cbe98a3da209af4 and f9bc1eb22f57e8b64c61a7cb7c01c519b8536880. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (3)</summary> * `src/controllers/api/setEquippedInstrumentController.ts` (1 hunks) * `src/routes/api.ts` (2 hunks) * `src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts` (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/routes/api.ts (1)</summary> `59-59`: **LGTM!** The changes follow the established patterns in the codebase: 1. Controller import is properly grouped with other imports 2. Route registration follows the same pattern as other POST routes Also applies to: 145-145 </details> </blockquote></details> </details>

src/controllers/api/setEquippedInstrumentController.ts

						
				@ -0,0 +10,4 @@

				    inventory.EquippedInstrument = body.Instrument;

				    await inventory.save();

				    res.end();

				};

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2025-01-10 23:14:30 -08:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and input validation.

The controller needs to handle potential errors and validate input:

Add try-catch block for error handling
Validate the Instrument string
Set appropriate response status codes

Apply this diff to improve error handling and validation:

 export const setEquippedInstrumentController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => {
+    try {
+        if (!req.body) {
+            return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Request body is required' });
+        }
         const accountId = await getAccountIdForRequest(req);
+        if (!accountId) {
+            return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' });
+        }
         const inventory = await getInventory(accountId);
         const body = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as ISetEquippedInstrumentRequest;
+        if (!body.Instrument || typeof body.Instrument !== 'string') {
+            return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid instrument value' });
+        }
         inventory.EquippedInstrument = body.Instrument;
         await inventory.save();
-        res.end();
+        res.status(200).json({ message: 'Instrument equipped successfully' });
+    } catch (error) {
+        console.error('Error setting equipped instrument:', error);
+        res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' });
+    }
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export const setEquippedInstrumentController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => {
    try {
        if (!req.body) {
            return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Request body is required' });
        }
        const accountId = await getAccountIdForRequest(req);
        if (!accountId) {
            return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' });
        }
        const inventory = await getInventory(accountId);
        const body = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as ISetEquippedInstrumentRequest;
        if (!body.Instrument || typeof body.Instrument !== 'string') {
            return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid instrument value' });
        }
        inventory.EquippedInstrument = body.Instrument;
        await inventory.save();
        res.status(200).json({ message: 'Instrument equipped successfully' });
    } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error setting equipped instrument:', error);
        res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' });
    }
};

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Add error handling and input validation.** The controller needs to handle potential errors and validate input: 1. Add try-catch block for error handling 2. Validate the Instrument string 3. Set appropriate response status codes Apply this diff to improve error handling and validation: ```diff export const setEquippedInstrumentController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => { + try { + if (!req.body) { + return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Request body is required' }); + } const accountId = await getAccountIdForRequest(req); + if (!accountId) { + return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }); + } const inventory = await getInventory(accountId); const body = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as ISetEquippedInstrumentRequest; + if (!body.Instrument || typeof body.Instrument !== 'string') { + return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid instrument value' }); + } inventory.EquippedInstrument = body.Instrument; await inventory.save(); - res.end(); + res.status(200).json({ message: 'Instrument equipped successfully' }); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error setting equipped instrument:', error); + res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' }); + } }; ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion export const setEquippedInstrumentController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => { try { if (!req.body) { return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Request body is required' }); } const accountId = await getAccountIdForRequest(req); if (!accountId) { return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }); } const inventory = await getInventory(accountId); const body = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as ISetEquippedInstrumentRequest; if (!body.Instrument || typeof body.Instrument !== 'string') { return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid instrument value' }); } inventory.EquippedInstrument = body.Instrument; await inventory.save(); res.status(200).json({ message: 'Instrument equipped successfully' }); } catch (error) { console.error('Error setting equipped instrument:', error); res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' }); } }; ````` </details>

src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts

						
				@ -252,3 +252,3 @@

				    MoaPets: IEquipmentDatabase[];

				    EquippedInstrument: string;

				    EquippedInstrument?: string;

				    InvasionChainProgress: IInvasionChainProgress[];

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2025-01-10 23:14:31 -08:00

💡 Codebase verification

Make EquippedInstrument a required field

The field is defined as required in the database schema (inventoryModel.ts) and the setEquippedInstrumentController implementation assumes its presence. The optional marker (?) should be removed to maintain consistency with the underlying data model.

src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts: Change EquippedInstrument?: string; to EquippedInstrument: string;

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify if EquippedInstrument should be optional.

The property is marked as optional (?). Please verify if this is intentional:

Are there cases where this property might not exist?
Should existing inventories be migrated to include a default value?

Run the following script to check existing inventory documents:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any existing inventories have the EquippedInstrument field
# and what values it contains

# Search for inventory-related files
echo "Searching for inventory-related files..."
rg -l "inventory" --type ts

# Search for migrations or default values
echo "Searching for any migrations or default values..."
rg "EquippedInstrument.*default" --type ts

Length of output: 3151

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation and usage of EquippedInstrument

# Check setEquippedInstrumentController implementation
echo "Checking setEquippedInstrumentController implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export class setEquippedInstrumentController {
  $$$
}'

# Search for EquippedInstrument usage
echo -e "\nSearching for EquippedInstrument usage:"
rg "EquippedInstrument" -B 2 -A 2 --type ts

# Check inventory models for related fields
echo -e "\nChecking inventory models:"
rg "EquippedInstrument" src/models/inventoryModels/ -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 3911

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Make EquippedInstrument a required field** The field is defined as required in the database schema (inventoryModel.ts) and the setEquippedInstrumentController implementation assumes its presence. The optional marker (?) should be removed to maintain consistency with the underlying data model. - `src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts`: Change `EquippedInstrument?: string;` to `EquippedInstrument: string;` <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Verify if EquippedInstrument should be optional.** The property is marked as optional (`?`). Please verify if this is intentional: 1. Are there cases where this property might not exist? 2. Should existing inventories be migrated to include a default value? Run the following script to check existing inventory documents: </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if any existing inventories have the EquippedInstrument field # and what values it contains # Search for inventory-related files echo "Searching for inventory-related files..." rg -l "inventory" --type ts # Search for migrations or default values echo "Searching for any migrations or default values..." rg "EquippedInstrument.*default" --type ts ``` Length of output: 3151 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Check implementation and usage of EquippedInstrument # Check setEquippedInstrumentController implementation echo "Checking setEquippedInstrumentController implementation:" ast-grep --pattern 'export class setEquippedInstrumentController { $$$ }' # Search for EquippedInstrument usage echo -e "\nSearching for EquippedInstrument usage:" rg "EquippedInstrument" -B 2 -A 2 --type ts # Check inventory models for related fields echo -e "\nChecking inventory models:" rg "EquippedInstrument" src/models/inventoryModels/ -B 2 -A 2 ``` Length of output: 3911 </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#762