feat: replicate dojo research #701

Sainan · 2025-01-03T14:07:00-08:00

Sainan commented

2025-01-03 14:07:00 -08:00

Closes #700

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2025-01-03 14:07:06 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the guildTechController in the src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts file to introduce a new "Buy" action for guild tech interactions. The changes include adding support for parsing a new action type that allows users to purchase recipes. A new type IGuildTechBuyFields is introduced, which extends the existing IGuildTechStartFields. The controller now handles the "Buy" action by extracting the quantity from the action string and utilizing the addRecipes function from the inventoryService to update the inventory. The modification aims to expand the functionality of guild tech interactions by enabling recipe purchases while maintaining the existing logic for sync, start, and contribute actions.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Handle "Buy" action for guild tech	✅
Resolve 500 error for unknown "Buy" action	✅
Support buying Dagath's parts	✅

The changes directly address the issue #700 by implementing the "Buy" action handler, which resolves the previous 500 error when attempting to purchase researched items like Dagath's parts. The modification allows for parsing the "Buy" action with a quantity, integrating it seamlessly into the existing guild tech controller logic.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The pull request modifies the `guildTechController` in the `src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts` file to introduce a new "Buy" action for guild tech interactions. The changes include adding support for parsing a new action type that allows users to purchase recipes. A new type `IGuildTechBuyFields` is introduced, which extends the existing `IGuildTechStartFields`. The controller now handles the "Buy" action by extracting the quantity from the action string and utilizing the `addRecipes` function from the `inventoryService` to update the inventory. The modification aims to expand the functionality of guild tech interactions by enabling recipe purchases while maintaining the existing logic for sync, start, and contribute actions. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Handle "Buy" action for guild tech | ✅ | | | Resolve 500 error for unknown "Buy" action | ✅ | | | Support buying Dagath's parts | ✅ | | The changes directly address the issue #700 by implementing the "Buy" action handler, which resolves the previous 500 error when attempting to purchase researched items like Dagath's parts. The modification allows for parsing the "Buy" action with a quantity, integrating it seamlessly into the existing guild tech controller logic.      --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2025-01-03 14:08:58 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts (3)

5-5: Validate concurrency concerns for new addRecipes usage
It’s great to see the new addRecipes function being leveraged here. If this method modifies shared state or relies on external services, consider adding concurrency protection or a transaction mechanism to guard against race conditions when multiple requests attempt to add recipes simultaneously.

14-14: Consider robust parsing for Action field
Breaking down the string by comma works, but may introduce edge cases. Consider validating the expected parameter count or adopting a structured query format to reduce the risk of parse errors and ensure more reliable input handling.

74-97: Transaction safety for currency updates
The code updates currency and adds recipes in a single request. Consider using a service-level transaction to maintain atomicity if partial failures or concurrency collisions can happen when multiple “Buy” actions occur simultaneously.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a6ffd94dc and 3f0bf48750.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts (5 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts (3)

19-19: Action handling approach is clear
This conditional block for handling the “Start” action remains straightforward and consistent with existing logic.

35-35: Contribute action logic
The updated line is consistent with the approach to parse actions via data.Action. No issues detected here.

113-114: Future-proofing the new IGuildTechBuyFields type
Defining IGuildTechBuyFields as an alias of IGuildTechStartFields is acceptable, especially if you plan to add unique “Buy” fields moving forward. Otherwise, consider if a simple alias is necessary.

**Actionable comments posted: 1** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (3)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts (3)</summary><blockquote> `5-5`: **Validate concurrency concerns for new `addRecipes` usage** It’s great to see the new `addRecipes` function being leveraged here. If this method modifies shared state or relies on external services, consider adding concurrency protection or a transaction mechanism to guard against race conditions when multiple requests attempt to add recipes simultaneously. --- `14-14`: **Consider robust parsing for `Action` field** Breaking down the string by comma works, but may introduce edge cases. Consider validating the expected parameter count or adopting a structured query format to reduce the risk of parse errors and ensure more reliable input handling. --- `74-97`: **Transaction safety for currency updates** The code updates currency and adds recipes in a single request. Consider using a service-level transaction to maintain atomicity if partial failures or concurrency collisions can happen when multiple “Buy” actions occur simultaneously. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a6ffd94dcd83ad2b9a1e298bcb50dfe5f56be71 and 3f0bf487500fc5ca1b6faee013741b99c7afca2b. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * `src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts` (5 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (3)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts (3)</summary> `19-19`: **Action handling approach is clear** This conditional block for handling the “Start” action remains straightforward and consistent with existing logic. --- `35-35`: **Contribute action logic** The updated line is consistent with the approach to parse actions via `data.Action`. No issues detected here. --- `113-114`: **Future-proofing the new `IGuildTechBuyFields` type** Defining `IGuildTechBuyFields` as an alias of `IGuildTechStartFields` is acceptable, especially if you plan to add unique “Buy” fields moving forward. Otherwise, consider if a simple alias is necessary. </details> </blockquote></details> </details>

src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2025-01-03 14:08:57 -08:00

💡 Codebase verification

Add input validation for quantity to prevent negative or invalid values

The code currently parses the quantity from data.Action.split(",")[1] without any validation. Based on the codebase analysis:

There's no validation middleware or schema validation in place
No existing checks for negative or invalid quantities
Only basic error handling for unknown actions is present

Add validation before processing the purchase:

const quantity = parseInt(data.Action.split(",")[1]);
if (isNaN(quantity) || quantity <= 0) {
    throw new Error("Invalid quantity: must be a positive number");
}

🔗 Analysis chain

Handle edge cases and negative or invalid quantities
When parsing the quantity with parseInt(data.Action.split(",")[1]), invalid or negative values could cause unexpected behavior. For example, a negative or string input may allow forging an unintended purchase quantity. Consider sanitizing the input to ensure it’s within acceptable constraints and returning an error or limiting the purchase.

Let me gather more information about input validation and error handling in this controller.

Let me check for any type validation or error handling in the route handler or middleware.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Attempts to detect direct usage with negative or non-integer values for quantity.
rg -A 3 'Action\.split'

Length of output: 684

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any input validation or error handling patterns in the controller
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($_ < 0) { $$$ }' src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts
rg -B 2 -A 2 'throw.*Error' src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts
# Check the type definition of IGuildTechBuyFields
rg -A 5 'interface IGuildTechBuyFields'

Length of output: 303

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for route definition and middleware
rg -B 3 -A 3 'guildTech.*router\.' 
# Check for any validation middleware or schema
rg -B 2 -A 5 'validate.*Schema'
# Look for the type definition in a types file
fd -e ts -e d.ts -x rg -l 'IGuildTechBuyFields'

Length of output: 163

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Add input validation for quantity to prevent negative or invalid values** The code currently parses the quantity from `data.Action.split(",")[1]` without any validation. Based on the codebase analysis: - There's no validation middleware or schema validation in place - No existing checks for negative or invalid quantities - Only basic error handling for unknown actions is present Add validation before processing the purchase: ```typescript const quantity = parseInt(data.Action.split(",")[1]); if (isNaN(quantity) || quantity <= 0) { throw new Error("Invalid quantity: must be a positive number"); } ``` <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Handle edge cases and negative or invalid quantities** When parsing the quantity with `parseInt(data.Action.split(",")[1])`, invalid or negative values could cause unexpected behavior. For example, a negative or string input may allow forging an unintended purchase quantity. Consider sanitizing the input to ensure it’s within acceptable constraints and returning an error or limiting the purchase. --- Let me gather more information about input validation and error handling in this controller. --- Let me check for any type validation or error handling in the route handler or middleware. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Attempts to detect direct usage with negative or non-integer values for quantity. rg -A 3 'Action\.split' ``` Length of output: 684 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Check for any input validation or error handling patterns in the controller ast-grep --pattern 'if ($_ < 0) { $$$ }' src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts rg -B 2 -A 2 'throw.*Error' src/controllers/api/guildTechController.ts # Check the type definition of IGuildTechBuyFields rg -A 5 'interface IGuildTechBuyFields' ``` Length of output: 303 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Look for route definition and middleware rg -B 3 -A 3 'guildTech.*router\.' # Check for any validation middleware or schema rg -B 2 -A 5 'validate.*Schema' # Look for the type definition in a types file fd -e ts -e d.ts -x rg -l 'IGuildTechBuyFields' ``` Length of output: 163 </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#701