fix: unable to spawn all enemies in simulacrum despite unlockAllScans #642

Sainan · 2024-12-27T12:12:59-08:00

Sainan commented

2024-12-27 12:12:59 -08:00

No description provided.

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-12-27 12:13:06 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped as selected files did not have any reviewable changes.

💤 Files selected but had no reviewable changes (1)

static/fixed_responses/allScans.json

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the viewController.ts file within the stats controllers. The changes involve importing the ExportEnemies module from warframe-public-export-plus and implementing a new conditional logic for scan data processing. When the config.unlockAllScans flag is enabled, the code populates the responseJson.Scans array with additional scan entries.

The implementation includes a mechanism to iterate through ExportEnemies.avatars and dynamically add scan entries for enemy types that are not already present in the existing scans. For these new entries, a fixed scan value of 9999 is assigned. This approach ensures comprehensive scan coverage and allows for potential expansion of scan data based on the configuration settings.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

> [!IMPORTANT] > ## Review skipped > > Review was skipped as selected files did not have any reviewable changes. > > <details> > <summary>💤 Files selected but had no reviewable changes (1)</summary> > > * static/fixed_responses/allScans.json > > </details> > > > > You can disable this status message by setting the `reviews.review_status` to `false` in the CodeRabbit configuration file.   ## Walkthrough The pull request introduces modifications to the `viewController.ts` file within the stats controllers. The changes involve importing the `ExportEnemies` module from `warframe-public-export-plus` and implementing a new conditional logic for scan data processing. When the `config.unlockAllScans` flag is enabled, the code populates the `responseJson.Scans` array with additional scan entries. The implementation includes a mechanism to iterate through `ExportEnemies.avatars` and dynamically add scan entries for enemy types that are not already present in the existing scans. For these new entries, a fixed scan value of 9999 is assigned. This approach ensures comprehensive scan coverage and allows for potential expansion of scan data based on the configuration settings.      --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-27 12:14:37 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/controllers/stats/viewController.ts (1)
27-31: Optimize lookup for large sets of avatars.

This block iterates over each key in ExportEnemies.avatars and calls find(...) on responseJson.Scans, resulting in O(n*m) complexity if both lists become large. Consider using a Set or Map for faster lookups:
 if (config.unlockAllScans) {
   responseJson.Scans = allScans;
-  for (const type of Object.keys(ExportEnemies.avatars)) {
-      if (!responseJson.Scans.find(x => x.type == type)) {
-          responseJson.Scans.push({ type, scans: 9999 });
-      }
-  }
+  const existingTypes = new Set(responseJson.Scans.map(x => x.type));
+  for (const type of Object.keys(ExportEnemies.avatars)) {
+    if (!existingTypes.has(type)) {
+      responseJson.Scans.push({ type, scans: 9999 });
+      existingTypes.add(type);
+    }
+  }
 }

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d1bbff99e and 61b20d5981.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/controllers/stats/viewController.ts (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/controllers/stats/viewController.ts (1)

7-7: Ensure ExportEnemies package is installed and consistent with other imports.

The newly introduced import appears correct. Verify that the warframe-public-export-plus package is installed in the project dependencies and that other modules are using a compatible version if necessary.

✅ Verification successful

Package is installed and import usage is consistent

The verification shows that:

The warframe-public-export-plus package is properly installed with version ^0.5.15 in the project dependencies
The package is widely used across the codebase with various exports
This is the only import of ExportEnemies, making it a unique use case
All imports consistently use the same package name

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that `warframe-public-export-plus` is included in package.json or yarn.lock, etc.
fd package.json | xargs cat | jq '.dependencies."warframe-public-export-plus"'

Length of output: 90

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other imports of warframe-public-export-plus in the codebase
rg "from ['\"]warframe-public-export-plus['\"]" -g '*.ts' -g '*.js'

# Check if there are any other imports specifically for ExportEnemies
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$ExportEnemies$$$ } from "warframe-public-export-plus"'

Length of output: 1696

**Actionable comments posted: 0** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/stats/viewController.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `27-31`: **Optimize lookup for large sets of avatars.** This block iterates over each key in `ExportEnemies.avatars` and calls `find(...)` on `responseJson.Scans`, resulting in O(n*m) complexity if both lists become large. Consider using a `Set` or `Map` for faster lookups: ```diff if (config.unlockAllScans) { responseJson.Scans = allScans; - for (const type of Object.keys(ExportEnemies.avatars)) { - if (!responseJson.Scans.find(x => x.type == type)) { - responseJson.Scans.push({ type, scans: 9999 }); - } - } + const existingTypes = new Set(responseJson.Scans.map(x => x.type)); + for (const type of Object.keys(ExportEnemies.avatars)) { + if (!existingTypes.has(type)) { + responseJson.Scans.push({ type, scans: 9999 }); + existingTypes.add(type); + } + } } ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d1bbff99e55b8ddac60197a0331f79e780d17e1 and 61b20d59819bb6e85f6bac13d284aedd0baf5c97. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * `src/controllers/stats/viewController.ts` (2 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (1)</summary> <details> <summary>src/controllers/stats/viewController.ts (1)</summary> `7-7`: **Ensure `ExportEnemies` package is installed and consistent with other imports.** The newly introduced import appears correct. Verify that the `warframe-public-export-plus` package is installed in the project dependencies and that other modules are using a compatible version if necessary. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> **Package is installed and import usage is consistent** The verification shows that: - The `warframe-public-export-plus` package is properly installed with version `^0.5.15` in the project dependencies - The package is widely used across the codebase with various exports - This is the only import of `ExportEnemies`, making it a unique use case - All imports consistently use the same package name </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Verify that `warframe-public-export-plus` is included in package.json or yarn.lock, etc. fd package.json | xargs cat | jq '.dependencies."warframe-public-export-plus"' ``` Length of output: 90 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Check for other imports of warframe-public-export-plus in the codebase rg "from ['\"]warframe-public-export-plus['\"]" -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' # Check if there are any other imports specifically for ExportEnemies ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$ExportEnemies$$$ } from "warframe-public-export-plus"' ``` Length of output: 1696 </details> </details> </details> </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#642