fix: booster packs not showing what items were gained after purchase #635

Sainan · 2024-12-23T14:42:00-08:00

Sainan commented

2024-12-23 14:42:00 -08:00

Fixes #464

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-12-23 14:42:07 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to handle booster pack purchases more comprehensively. In the purchaseService.ts, a new handleBoosterPackPurchase function is added to manage the purchase of booster packs, including random item selection based on weighted rewards. The purchaseTypes.ts is updated to include an optional BoosterPackItems property in the IPurchaseResponse interface, allowing for the inclusion of gained items from booster packs. Correspondingly, the inventoryService.ts has removed previous booster pack-related logic, suggesting a refactoring of how booster pack items are processed.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Show items gained from booster pack purchase [#464]	✅
Include `BoosterPackItems` in purchase response [#464]	✅
Support booster pack item generation	✅

The changes directly address the requirements outlined in issue #464 by:

Adding BoosterPackItems to the purchase response interface
Implementing a mechanism to generate and track booster pack items
Ensuring that the purchase response can include the specific items gained from a booster pack

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The pull request introduces changes to handle booster pack purchases more comprehensively. In the `purchaseService.ts`, a new `handleBoosterPackPurchase` function is added to manage the purchase of booster packs, including random item selection based on weighted rewards. The `purchaseTypes.ts` is updated to include an optional `BoosterPackItems` property in the `IPurchaseResponse` interface, allowing for the inclusion of gained items from booster packs. Correspondingly, the `inventoryService.ts` has removed previous booster pack-related logic, suggesting a refactoring of how booster pack items are processed. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Show items gained from booster pack purchase [#464] | ✅ | | | Include `BoosterPackItems` in purchase response [#464] | ✅ | | | Support booster pack item generation | ✅ | | The changes directly address the requirements outlined in issue #464 by: 1. Adding `BoosterPackItems` to the purchase response interface 2. Implementing a mechanism to generate and track booster pack items 3. Ensuring that the purchase response can include the specific items gained from a booster pack      --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-23 15:27:46 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

src/services/purchaseService.ts (2)
268-290: Ensure correct booster pack item concatenation
Inside handleBoosterPackPurchase, the concatenation to BoosterPackItems might break if items contain unexpected characters. Consider safer serialization or JSON encoding to avoid future parsing issues.

303-304: Reposition the default case at the end for clarity
Per the static analysis hint, consider moving the default case to the last position in the switch block. This improves readability without affecting functionality.
 switch (typeCategory) {
-    default:
-        return await addItem(accountId, typesName, quantity);
     case "BoosterPacks":
         return await handleBoosterPackPurchase(typesName, accountId);
     case "SlotItems":
         return await handleSlotPurchase(typesName, accountId);
+    default:
+        return await addItem(accountId, typesName, quantity);
 }

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8ad979ab11 and eb9c391dba.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

src/services/inventoryService.ts (0 hunks)
src/services/purchaseService.ts (3 hunks)
src/types/purchaseTypes.ts (1 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

src/services/inventoryService.ts

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

src/services/purchaseService.ts

[error] 301-302: The default clause should be the last switch clause.

The following case clause is here:

Regardless its position, the default clause is always executed when there is no match. To avoid confusion, the default clause should be the last switch clause.

(lint/suspicious/useDefaultSwitchClauseLast)

🔇 Additional comments (5)

src/types/purchaseTypes.ts (1)

28-28: New optional property for booster pack items looks good
Adding a new optional property "BoosterPackItems" to the interface is a straightforward way to include gained items in the purchase response. Ensure that it remains aligned with any downstream logic expecting these items.

src/services/purchaseService.ts (4)

12-12: Confirm dependency usage
The newly imported getRandomWeightedReward function is integral to randomizing booster pack rolls. Make sure all test scenarios are updated to confirm its correct behavior.

19-19: Validate external export references
The ExportBoosterPacks import references external data. Double-check that the imported values match what is expected for booster packs to avoid runtime issues.

43-46: Explicit return type enhances type safety
Explicitly returning a Promise is consistent with best practices, improving maintainability and IDE support.

297-297: Aligned function signature
Changing handleTypesPurchase to Promise aligns it with the rest of the codebase’s purchase flow. This appears consistent and logical.

**Actionable comments posted: 0** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/services/purchaseService.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `268-290`: **Ensure correct booster pack item concatenation** Inside handleBoosterPackPurchase, the concatenation to BoosterPackItems might break if items contain unexpected characters. Consider safer serialization or JSON encoding to avoid future parsing issues. --- `303-304`: **Reposition the default case at the end for clarity** Per the static analysis hint, consider moving the default case to the last position in the switch block. This improves readability without affecting functionality. ```diff switch (typeCategory) { - default: - return await addItem(accountId, typesName, quantity); case "BoosterPacks": return await handleBoosterPackPurchase(typesName, accountId); case "SlotItems": return await handleSlotPurchase(typesName, accountId); + default: + return await addItem(accountId, typesName, quantity); } ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8ad979ab11f04e3271958717eb0efe81de5001eb and eb9c391dba249ceee38db2765b8fa4e89f363704. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (3)</summary> * `src/services/inventoryService.ts` (0 hunks) * `src/services/purchaseService.ts` (3 hunks) * `src/types/purchaseTypes.ts` (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)</summary> * src/services/inventoryService.ts </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Biome (1.9.4)</summary> <details> <summary>src/services/purchaseService.ts</summary> [error] 301-302: The default clause should be the last switch clause. The following case clause is here: Regardless its position, the default clause is always executed when there is no match. To avoid confusion, the default clause should be the last switch clause. (lint/suspicious/useDefaultSwitchClauseLast) </details> </details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (5)</summary> <details> <summary>src/types/purchaseTypes.ts (1)</summary> `28-28`: **New optional property for booster pack items looks good** Adding a new optional property "BoosterPackItems" to the interface is a straightforward way to include gained items in the purchase response. Ensure that it remains aligned with any downstream logic expecting these items. </details> <details> <summary>src/services/purchaseService.ts (4)</summary> `12-12`: **Confirm dependency usage** The newly imported getRandomWeightedReward function is integral to randomizing booster pack rolls. Make sure all test scenarios are updated to confirm its correct behavior. --- `19-19`: **Validate external export references** The ExportBoosterPacks import references external data. Double-check that the imported values match what is expected for booster packs to avoid runtime issues. --- `43-46`: **Explicit return type enhances type safety** Explicitly returning a Promise<IPurchaseResponse> is consistent with best practices, improving maintainability and IDE support. --- `297-297`: **Aligned function signature** Changing handleTypesPurchase to Promise<IPurchaseResponse> aligns it with the rest of the codebase’s purchase flow. This appears consistent and logical. </details> </details> </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#635