feat: decorating the backroom #604

Sainan · 2024-12-22T11:22:27-08:00

Sainan commented

2024-12-22 11:22:27 -08:00

Closes #602

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-12-22 11:22:33 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive enhancement to the application's data model and type system, focusing on the integration of a new "Tailor Shop" concept across multiple files. The changes span several key components of the system, including controllers, models, services, and type definitions.

The primary modification involves adding a TailorShop property to various interfaces and schemas, extending the existing personal rooms structure. This new entity includes features like favorite loadouts, custom JSON data, level decorations visibility, and room configurations. The changes affect type definitions in shipTypes.ts, model schemas in personalRoomsModel.ts, and type interfaces in personalRoomsTypes.ts.

The implementation updates several key files to support this new feature, including modifications to the getShipController, shipDecorationsController, and shipCustomizationsService. These changes introduce more flexible room selection logic and expand the data structures to accommodate the new tailor shop functionality.

The modifications maintain the existing error handling and core functionality while providing a more robust and extensible approach to managing ship-related and personal room data.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
The game should correctly reflect the capacity of the backroom in the getShip response. (#602)	✅

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough This pull request introduces a comprehensive enhancement to the application's data model and type system, focusing on the integration of a new "Tailor Shop" concept across multiple files. The changes span several key components of the system, including controllers, models, services, and type definitions. The primary modification involves adding a `TailorShop` property to various interfaces and schemas, extending the existing personal rooms structure. This new entity includes features like favorite loadouts, custom JSON data, level decorations visibility, and room configurations. The changes affect type definitions in `shipTypes.ts`, model schemas in `personalRoomsModel.ts`, and type interfaces in `personalRoomsTypes.ts`. The implementation updates several key files to support this new feature, including modifications to the `getShipController`, `shipDecorationsController`, and `shipCustomizationsService`. These changes introduce more flexible room selection logic and expand the data structures to accommodate the new tailor shop functionality. The modifications maintain the existing error handling and core functionality while providing a more robust and extensible approach to managing ship-related and personal room data. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------| | The game should correctly reflect the capacity of the backroom in the getShip response. (#602) | ✅ | |      --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-22 11:24:40 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)

src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts (1)

130-139: Potential type workaround with "as any as undefined".
While the workaround is a known limitation in Mongoose type definitions, consider adding a short comment indicating why it’s needed. Alternatively, you might explicitly define a suitable type override rather than chaining “as any as undefined”.
src/types/shipTypes.ts (2)
30-33: Consider adding JSDoc comments for the BootLocation property

The interface changes look good, particularly the rename from IRooms to IRoom for consistency. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and valid use cases of the BootLocation property.
 export interface IShip {
     Features: string[];
     ShipId: IOid;
     ShipInterior: IShipInterior;
     Rooms: IRoom[];
     ContentUrlSignature: string;
+    /** Location where the ship boots into. Used for determining initial room placement and decoration context. */
     BootLocation?: TBootLocation;
 }
106-107: Consider adding runtime validation for BootLocation

While the TypeScript types provide compile-time safety, consider adding runtime validation to ensure BootLocation values are valid, especially if they come from external sources.
const isValidBootLocation = (location: string): location is TBootLocation => {
  return ['LISET', 'DRIFTER_CAMP', 'APARTMENT', 'SHOP'].includes(location);
};
src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-146: Address capacity calculation TODOs

There are multiple TODO comments about calculating capacity changes. This seems to be an important feature that's currently missing. Would you like assistance in implementing the capacity calculations?

I can help:

Define the capacity calculation logic

Implement the calculations in the relevant places

Add tests to verify the behavior

🛑 Comments failed to post (4)

src/types/personalRoomsTypes.ts (1)
1-1: ⚠️ Potential issue

Typo in imported member "IRooms".
According to static analysis, "IRooms" does not appear to be exported from shipTypes. If you intended "IRoom," replace "IRooms" with "IRoom" to avoid build errors.

Proposed fix:
- import { IApartment, IRooms, IPlacedDecosDatabase, ITailorShop, TBootLocation } from "@/src/types/shipTypes";
+ import { IApartment, IRoom, IPlacedDecosDatabase, ITailorShop, TBootLocation } from "@/src/types/shipTypes";
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
import { IApartment, IRoom, IPlacedDecosDatabase, ITailorShop, TBootLocation } from "@/src/types/shipTypes";
🧰 Tools

🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[failure] 1-1:
'"@/src/types/shipTypes"' has no exported member named 'IRooms'. Did you mean 'IRoom'?

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[failure] 1-1:
'"@/src/types/shipTypes"' has no exported member named 'IRooms'. Did you mean 'IRoom'?

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[failure] 1-1:
'"@/src/types/shipTypes"' has no exported member named 'IRooms'. Did you mean 'IRoom'?
src/types/shipTypes.ts (2)
157-162: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix placeholder types in ITailorShopDatabase

There are two concerning type definitions:

CustomJson: "{}" appears to be a literal type rather than a proper JSON type

The purpose of these properties isn't clear from their types

Consider these improvements:
 export interface ITailorShopDatabase {
     FavouriteLoadouts: IFavouriteLoadoutDatabase[];
-    CustomJson: "{}"; // ???
+    CustomJson: Record<string, unknown>;
     LevelDecosVisible: boolean;
     Rooms: IRoom[];
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
export interface ITailorShopDatabase {
    FavouriteLoadouts: IFavouriteLoadoutDatabase[];
    CustomJson: Record<string, unknown>;
    LevelDecosVisible: boolean;
    Rooms: IRoom[];
}
164-167: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix Colors type in ITailorShop interface

The Colors property is typed as an empty array [], which is likely incorrect. Based on the codebase patterns, this should probably use the IColor type.
 export interface ITailorShop extends Omit<ITailorShopDatabase, "FavouriteLoadouts"> {
     FavouriteLoadouts: IFavouriteLoadout[];
-    Colors: []; // ???
+    Colors: IColor[];
 }
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts (1)
40-45: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify room selection logic for better readability

The nested ternary operators make the code harder to read and maintain. Consider using early returns or a switch statement for better clarity.
-    const rooms =
-        placedDecoration.BootLocation == "SHOP"
-            ? personalRooms.TailorShop.Rooms
-            : placedDecoration.IsApartment
-              ? personalRooms.Apartment.Rooms
-              : personalRooms.Ship.Rooms;
+    const getRooms = () => {
+        if (placedDecoration.BootLocation === "SHOP") {
+            return personalRooms.TailorShop.Rooms;
+        }
+        if (placedDecoration.IsApartment) {
+            return personalRooms.Apartment.Rooms;
+        }
+        return personalRooms.Ship.Rooms;
+    };
+    const rooms = getRooms();
Also, consider using strict equality (===) instead of loose equality (==) for type safety.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
    const getRooms = () => {
        if (placedDecoration.BootLocation === "SHOP") {
            return personalRooms.TailorShop.Rooms;
        }
        if (placedDecoration.IsApartment) {
            return personalRooms.Apartment.Rooms;
        }
        return personalRooms.Ship.Rooms;
    };
    const rooms = getRooms();

> [!CAUTION] > Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. **Actionable comments posted: 4** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (4)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `130-139`: **Potential type workaround with "as any as undefined".** While the workaround is a known limitation in Mongoose type definitions, consider adding a short comment indicating why it’s needed. Alternatively, you might explicitly define a suitable type override rather than chaining “as any as undefined”. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/types/shipTypes.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `30-33`: **Consider adding JSDoc comments for the BootLocation property** The interface changes look good, particularly the rename from IRooms to IRoom for consistency. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and valid use cases of the BootLocation property. ```diff export interface IShip { Features: string[]; ShipId: IOid; ShipInterior: IShipInterior; Rooms: IRoom[]; ContentUrlSignature: string; + /** Location where the ship boots into. Used for determining initial room placement and decoration context. */ BootLocation?: TBootLocation; } ``` --- `106-107`: **Consider adding runtime validation for BootLocation** While the TypeScript types provide compile-time safety, consider adding runtime validation to ensure BootLocation values are valid, especially if they come from external sources. ```typescript const isValidBootLocation = (location: string): location is TBootLocation => { return ['LISET', 'DRIFTER_CAMP', 'APARTMENT', 'SHOP'].includes(location); }; ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> Line range hint `1-146`: **Address capacity calculation TODOs** There are multiple TODO comments about calculating capacity changes. This seems to be an important feature that's currently missing. Would you like assistance in implementing the capacity calculations? I can help: 1. Define the capacity calculation logic 2. Implement the calculations in the relevant places 3. Add tests to verify the behavior </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🛑 Comments failed to post (4)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/types/personalRoomsTypes.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> 1-1: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Typo in imported member "IRooms".** According to static analysis, "IRooms" does not appear to be exported from shipTypes. If you intended "IRoom," replace "IRooms" with "IRoom" to avoid build errors. Proposed fix: ```diff - import { IApartment, IRooms, IPlacedDecosDatabase, ITailorShop, TBootLocation } from "@/src/types/shipTypes"; + import { IApartment, IRoom, IPlacedDecosDatabase, ITailorShop, TBootLocation } from "@/src/types/shipTypes"; ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion import { IApartment, IRoom, IPlacedDecosDatabase, ITailorShop, TBootLocation } from "@/src/types/shipTypes"; ````` </details>  <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary> [failure] 1-1: '"@/src/types/shipTypes"' has no exported member named 'IRooms'. Did you mean 'IRoom'? </details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary> [failure] 1-1: '"@/src/types/shipTypes"' has no exported member named 'IRooms'. Did you mean 'IRoom'? </details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary> [failure] 1-1: '"@/src/types/shipTypes"' has no exported member named 'IRooms'. Did you mean 'IRoom'? </details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/types/shipTypes.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> 157-162: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Fix placeholder types in ITailorShopDatabase** There are two concerning type definitions: 1. `CustomJson: "{}"` appears to be a literal type rather than a proper JSON type 2. The purpose of these properties isn't clear from their types Consider these improvements: ```diff export interface ITailorShopDatabase { FavouriteLoadouts: IFavouriteLoadoutDatabase[]; - CustomJson: "{}"; // ??? + CustomJson: Record<string, unknown>; LevelDecosVisible: boolean; Rooms: IRoom[]; } ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion export interface ITailorShopDatabase { FavouriteLoadouts: IFavouriteLoadoutDatabase[]; CustomJson: Record<string, unknown>; LevelDecosVisible: boolean; Rooms: IRoom[]; } ````` </details>  --- 164-167: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Fix Colors type in ITailorShop interface** The Colors property is typed as an empty array `[]`, which is likely incorrect. Based on the codebase patterns, this should probably use the IColor type. ```diff export interface ITailorShop extends Omit<ITailorShopDatabase, "FavouriteLoadouts"> { FavouriteLoadouts: IFavouriteLoadout[]; - Colors: []; // ??? + Colors: IColor[]; } ``` > Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> 40-45: _:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Simplify room selection logic for better readability** The nested ternary operators make the code harder to read and maintain. Consider using early returns or a switch statement for better clarity. ```diff - const rooms = - placedDecoration.BootLocation == "SHOP" - ? personalRooms.TailorShop.Rooms - : placedDecoration.IsApartment - ? personalRooms.Apartment.Rooms - : personalRooms.Ship.Rooms; + const getRooms = () => { + if (placedDecoration.BootLocation === "SHOP") { + return personalRooms.TailorShop.Rooms; + } + if (placedDecoration.IsApartment) { + return personalRooms.Apartment.Rooms; + } + return personalRooms.Ship.Rooms; + }; + const rooms = getRooms(); ``` Also, consider using strict equality (`===`) instead of loose equality (`==`) for type safety.  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion const getRooms = () => { if (placedDecoration.BootLocation === "SHOP") { return personalRooms.TailorShop.Rooms; } if (placedDecoration.IsApartment) { return personalRooms.Apartment.Rooms; } return personalRooms.Ship.Rooms; }; const rooms = getRooms(); ````` </details>  </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-22 11:28:30 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts (2)
87-100: Consider using type-safe alternatives instead of disabling eslint.

The eslint warning about unsafe argument suggests potential type safety issues.

Consider using a type-safe alternative:
 favouriteLoadoutSchema.set("toJSON", {
     virtuals: true,
     transform(_document, returnedObject) {
-        // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-argument
-        returnedObject.LoadoutId = toOid(returnedObject.LoadoutId);
+        returnedObject.LoadoutId = toOid(returnedObject.LoadoutId as Types.ObjectId);
     }
 });
115-128: Document the reasoning behind room capacity values.

The room capacities (4000, 3000, 2000) seem arbitrary. Consider adding comments explaining these magic numbers or moving them to constants with descriptive names.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ea3fdf2c073741e13e19b967ae044e230d967cb and 65c000249c.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

src/controllers/api/getShipController.ts (1 hunks)
src/controllers/api/shipDecorationsController.ts (1 hunks)
src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts (3 hunks)
src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts (1 hunks)
src/types/personalRoomsTypes.ts (3 hunks)
src/types/shipTypes.ts (7 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)

src/controllers/api/shipDecorationsController.ts
src/controllers/api/getShipController.ts
src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts
src/types/personalRoomsTypes.ts

🔇 Additional comments (4)

src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts (2)

3-11: LGTM!

The imports are well-organized and properly typed.

55-55: LGTM! Good type safety improvement.

Adding explicit typing to the Schema improves type safety and code maintainability.

src/types/shipTypes.ts (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The TailorShop field is properly typed with ITailorShop interface.

106-107: LGTM!

The optional properties are properly marked and consistent across interfaces.

Also applies to: 117-117

**Actionable comments posted: 4** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `87-100`: **Consider using type-safe alternatives instead of disabling eslint.** The eslint warning about unsafe argument suggests potential type safety issues. Consider using a type-safe alternative: ```diff favouriteLoadoutSchema.set("toJSON", { virtuals: true, transform(_document, returnedObject) { - // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-argument - returnedObject.LoadoutId = toOid(returnedObject.LoadoutId); + returnedObject.LoadoutId = toOid(returnedObject.LoadoutId as Types.ObjectId); } }); ``` --- `115-128`: **Document the reasoning behind room capacity values.** The room capacities (4000, 3000, 2000) seem arbitrary. Consider adding comments explaining these magic numbers or moving them to constants with descriptive names. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ea3fdf2c073741e13e19b967ae044e230d967cb and 65c000249ca047a0f75f918a82ed1a1c5e41d2ec. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (6)</summary> * `src/controllers/api/getShipController.ts` (1 hunks) * `src/controllers/api/shipDecorationsController.ts` (1 hunks) * `src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts` (3 hunks) * `src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts` (1 hunks) * `src/types/personalRoomsTypes.ts` (3 hunks) * `src/types/shipTypes.ts` (7 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)</summary> * src/controllers/api/shipDecorationsController.ts * src/controllers/api/getShipController.ts * src/services/shipCustomizationsService.ts * src/types/personalRoomsTypes.ts </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (4)</summary> <details> <summary>src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts (2)</summary> `3-11`: **LGTM!** The imports are well-organized and properly typed. --- `55-55`: **LGTM! Good type safety improvement.** Adding explicit typing to the Schema improves type safety and code maintainability. </details> <details> <summary>src/types/shipTypes.ts (2)</summary> `10-10`: **LGTM!** The TailorShop field is properly typed with ITailorShop interface. --- `106-107`: **LGTM!** The optional properties are properly marked and consistent across interfaces. Also applies to: 117-117 </details> </details> </details>

src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts

						
				@ -84,0 +135,4 @@

				    Apartment: apartmentSchema,

				    TailorShop: {

				        type: tailorShopSchema,

				        default: tailorShopDefault as any as undefined // Yeah, this is bad, but mongoose types here are wrong.

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-22 11:28:29 -08:00

💡 Codebase verification

CustomJson field requires schema validation and type safety improvements

Based on the codebase analysis, the CustomJson field appears to be a string type that's intended to store JSON data, but lacks proper validation and type safety:

It's defined as a String in the mongoose schema (CustomJson: String)
It has a default string value of "{}" rather than an actual object
No evidence of JSON parsing/stringifying operations or validation
No documentation or tests found explaining its purpose

Recommendations:

Define proper JSON schema validation for this field
Consider using a proper object type instead of string if storing structured data
Add documentation explaining the expected structure and purpose

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the purpose of CustomJson default value.

The default value of "{}" for CustomJson seems unusual. Consider:

Is this meant to be a valid JSON string?
Should it be stored as an object instead of a string?

Let me gather more context about the CustomJson field usage in the codebase.

Let me try one more search to understand if this field is used in any API endpoints or data transformations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for CustomJson usage to understand its purpose
rg -A 5 "CustomJson" --type ts

Length of output: 994

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any parsing or manipulation of CustomJson
rg -A 5 -B 5 'CustomJson.*=|\.CustomJson' --type ts

# Look for any tests or documentation
fd -e md -e test.ts -X rg -l "CustomJson"

Length of output: 95

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing both "CustomJson" and common data manipulation patterns
rg -l "CustomJson" --type ts | xargs rg -A 5 -B 5 "JSON\.|parse|stringify"

# Look for any API endpoints or routes that might handle this field
ast-grep --pattern 'router.$_($_, async function ($_, $_) {
  $$$
  CustomJson
  $$$
})'

Length of output: 165

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **CustomJson field requires schema validation and type safety improvements** Based on the codebase analysis, the CustomJson field appears to be a string type that's intended to store JSON data, but lacks proper validation and type safety: - It's defined as a String in the mongoose schema (`CustomJson: String`) - It has a default string value of "{}" rather than an actual object - No evidence of JSON parsing/stringifying operations or validation - No documentation or tests found explaining its purpose Recommendations: - Define proper JSON schema validation for this field - Consider using a proper object type instead of string if storing structured data - Add documentation explaining the expected structure and purpose <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Verify the purpose of CustomJson default value.** The default value of `"{}"` for CustomJson seems unusual. Consider: 1. Is this meant to be a valid JSON string? 2. Should it be stored as an object instead of a string? --- Let me gather more context about the CustomJson field usage in the codebase. --- Let me try one more search to understand if this field is used in any API endpoints or data transformations. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for CustomJson usage to understand its purpose rg -A 5 "CustomJson" --type ts ``` Length of output: 994 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for any parsing or manipulation of CustomJson rg -A 5 -B 5 'CustomJson.*=|\.CustomJson' --type ts # Look for any tests or documentation fd -e md -e test.ts -X rg -l "CustomJson" ``` Length of output: 95 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for files containing both "CustomJson" and common data manipulation patterns rg -l "CustomJson" --type ts | xargs rg -A 5 -B 5 "JSON\.|parse|stringify" # Look for any API endpoints or routes that might handle this field ast-grep --pattern 'router.$_($_, async function ($_, $_) { $$$ CustomJson $$$ })' ``` Length of output: 165 </details>

src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-22 11:28:29 -08:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve type safety by avoiding 'any' type assertion.

The comment acknowledges that the current type assertion is problematic. Consider creating a proper type for the default value or using a different mongoose schema configuration.

Consider alternatives:

-    TailorShop: {
-        type: tailorShopSchema,
-        default: tailorShopDefault as any as undefined // Yeah, this is bad, but mongoose types here are wrong.
-    }
+    TailorShop: {
+        type: tailorShopSchema,
+        default: () => ({ ...tailorShopDefault })
+    }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    TailorShop: {
        type: tailorShopSchema,
        default: () => ({ ...tailorShopDefault })
    }

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Improve type safety by avoiding 'any' type assertion.** The comment acknowledges that the current type assertion is problematic. Consider creating a proper type for the default value or using a different mongoose schema configuration. Consider alternatives: ```diff - TailorShop: { - type: tailorShopSchema, - default: tailorShopDefault as any as undefined // Yeah, this is bad, but mongoose types here are wrong. - } + TailorShop: { + type: tailorShopSchema, + default: () => ({ ...tailorShopDefault }) + } ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion TailorShop: { type: tailorShopSchema, default: () => ({ ...tailorShopDefault }) } ````` </details>

src/types/shipTypes.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-22 11:28:29 -08:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Revise the CustomJson type definition.

The literal type "{}" with the "???" comment suggests uncertainty in the design. This type is too restrictive as it only allows the exact string "{}".

Consider using a more appropriate type:

-    CustomJson: "{}"; // ???
+    CustomJson: string; // For JSON strings
// or
+    CustomJson: Record<string, unknown>; // For JSON objects

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Revise the CustomJson type definition.** The literal type `"{}"` with the "???" comment suggests uncertainty in the design. This type is too restrictive as it only allows the exact string "{}". Consider using a more appropriate type: ```diff - CustomJson: "{}"; // ??? + CustomJson: string; // For JSON strings // or + CustomJson: Record<string, unknown>; // For JSON objects ``` > Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

src/types/shipTypes.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-22 11:28:29 -08:00

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Colors field should be of type IColor

The codebase shows consistent usage of IColor interface for Colors fields across multiple files:

src/types/shipTypes.ts uses Colors: IColor in other interfaces
src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts also uses Colors: IColor
The interface IColor is defined in src/types/inventoryTypes/commonInventoryTypes.ts

-    Colors: []; // ???
+    Colors: IColor;

🔗 Analysis chain

Define proper type for Colors field.

The Colors field has an empty array type ([]) with a "???" comment, suggesting incomplete implementation.

Consider defining a proper type based on the intended usage:

-    Colors: []; // ???
+    Colors: IColor[]; // Assuming it should use the existing IColor interface

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Colors usage in TailorShop context
rg -A 5 "TailorShop.*Colors" --type ts

Length of output: 40

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for IColor interface and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IColor'

# Also search for any Colors type or field definitions
rg 'Colors:' --type ts -A 2

# Search for color-related types and usages
rg -i 'color' --type ts -A 2

Length of output: 13053

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ _:warning: Potential issue_ **Colors field should be of type IColor** The codebase shows consistent usage of `IColor` interface for Colors fields across multiple files: - `src/types/shipTypes.ts` uses `Colors: IColor` in other interfaces - `src/types/inventoryTypes/inventoryTypes.ts` also uses `Colors: IColor` - The interface `IColor` is defined in `src/types/inventoryTypes/commonInventoryTypes.ts` ```diff - Colors: []; // ??? + Colors: IColor; ``` <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Define proper type for Colors field.** The Colors field has an empty array type (`[]`) with a "???" comment, suggesting incomplete implementation. Consider defining a proper type based on the intended usage: ```diff - Colors: []; // ??? + Colors: IColor[]; // Assuming it should use the existing IColor interface ``` </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for Colors usage in TailorShop context rg -A 5 "TailorShop.*Colors" --type ts ``` Length of output: 40 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Let's search for IColor interface and its usage ast-grep --pattern 'interface IColor' # Also search for any Colors type or field definitions rg 'Colors:' --type ts -A 2 # Search for color-related types and usages rg -i 'color' --type ts -A 2 ``` Length of output: 13053 </details>

Sainan reviewed 2024-12-22 11:29:20 -08:00

src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts

Sainan commented

2024-12-22 11:29:20 -08:00

Nope, already tried this.

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-22 11:29:39 -08:00

src/models/personalRoomsModel.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-22 11:29:39 -08:00

@Sainan, understood—acknowledging your decision. Let me know if you’d like further exploration or a follow-up issue to revisit this later.
( ; ω ; )

@Sainan, understood—acknowledging your decision. Let me know if you’d like further exploration or a follow-up issue to revisit this later. ( ; ω ; )

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#604