feat: respect client-supplied version information #585
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "client-buildLabel"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Newer versions of the DLL (>=0.6.0) can determine the client version and will tell the server via query parameters on these relevant requests. The server of course still needs to have a copy of the relevant H.Cache.bin file.
Walkthrough
The pull request introduces modifications to three files:
loginController.ts
,worldStateController.ts
, andcache.ts
. The primary focus of these changes is to enhance the dynamic handling of build labels and cache versioning across different components of the application.In the
loginController.ts
, a new approach is implemented for setting thebuildLabel
by allowing it to be dynamically sourced from the request query parameter, with a fallback to the defaultbuildConfig.buildLabel
. Similarly, theworldStateController.ts
now processes thebuildLabel
by replacing spaces with plus signs and supports dynamic retrieval from the request query.The
cache.ts
route has been updated to provide more flexible cache file serving. Instead of always using a static version frombuildConfig
, the route now supports an optionalversion
query parameter. This parameter allows clients to request specific cache file versions that match a defined date format, with a default fallback to the configuration's version.These changes collectively improve the application's flexibility in handling build labels and cache versioning, enabling more dynamic configuration and client-side control.
Sequence Diagram
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
❤️ Share
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
Generate unit testing code for this file.
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
@coderabbitai
in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
@coderabbitai
in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pause
to pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resume
to resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai review
to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full review
to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summary
to regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolve
resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configuration
to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai help
to get help.Other keywords and placeholders
@coderabbitai ignore
anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.@coderabbitai summary
to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.@coderabbitai
anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.Documentation and Community
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between
259bfa1362
and e659f228b131be22d04f47a5f7ab4e971d74584f.📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/controllers/api/loginController.ts
(3 hunks)src/controllers/dynamic/worldStateController.ts
(1 hunks)src/routes/cache.ts
(1 hunks)🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)
src/routes/cache.ts
[failure] 9-9:
'req.query.version' may use Object's default stringification format ('[object Object]') when stringified
🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)
src/routes/cache.ts
[failure] 9-9:
'req.query.version' may use Object's default stringification format ('[object Object]') when stringified
🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)
src/routes/cache.ts
[failure] 9-9:
'req.query.version' may use Object's default stringification format ('[object Object]') when stringified
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/controllers/api/loginController.ts (1)
53-53
: Verify consistent BuildLabel usage across responsesThe BuildLabel is set consistently in both the new account and existing account responses. However, let's verify this is used consistently across all endpoints.
Also applies to: 89-89
✅ Verification successful
BuildLabel is used consistently across all endpoints and types
The verification shows that BuildLabel is used consistently throughout the codebase:
loginTypes.ts
andloginController.ts
)worldStateController.ts
)purchaseTypes.ts
andsellTypes.ts
)All instances follow the same pattern where:
BuildLabel
in responses,buildLabel
in request types)buildConfig.buildLabel
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 60
Script:
Length of output: 3890
Script:
Length of output: 37
Script:
Length of output: 1285
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract common buildLabel logic to shared utility
The buildLabel processing logic is duplicated across controllers. Consider extracting it to a shared utility function.
⚠️ Potential issue
Address potential security and robustness issues
Several concerns need to be addressed:
📝 Committable suggestion
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)
[failure] 9-9:
'req.query.version' may use Object's default stringification format ('[object Object]') when stringified
🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)
[failure] 9-9:
'req.query.version' may use Object's default stringification format ('[object Object]') when stringified
🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)
[failure] 9-9:
'req.query.version' may use Object's default stringification format ('[object Object]') when stringified
Bro's on that dollar store kush
@Sainan, thanks for your comment. Let me know if there’s anything specific you’d like me to address or clarify.
Label my builds daddy
@Sainan, it looks like you’re ready to roll with those build labels! Let me know if there’s any specific change you’d like me to make regarding the label processing logic, or if everything is good as-is.