feat: implement syndicateStandingBonus endpoint #583

Sainan · 2024-12-18T17:28:20-08:00

Sainan commented

2024-12-18 17:28:20 -08:00

Closes #535. Currently doesn't consider standing limits so you can end up with extra standing.

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-12-18 17:28:26 -08:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new endpoint /syndicateStandingBonus.php for processing syndicate standing bonuses. This is achieved by creating a new controller syndicateStandingBonusController in src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts and adding a corresponding route in src/routes/api.ts.

The controller processes requests to trade specific items, such as gems, for syndicate standing. It retrieves the user's account ID, parses the request body for details about the syndicate affiliation and items, and calculates the standing gained based on the items. The controller checks for corresponding medallions in the ExportSyndicates data structure to determine the standing value.

In addition, it updates the user's inventory by adding the specified miscellaneous items and adjusts the syndicate standing for the specified affiliation. A placeholder comment indicates potential future functionality for daily limits. After processing, the controller saves the updated inventory and responds with a JSON object that details the changes made to the inventory and the standing gained.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Implement endpoint for trading items for syndicate standing [#535]	✅
Handle POST request to `/api/syndicateStandingBonus.php` [#535]	✅
Support trading gems for syndicate standing [#535]	✅

The changes directly address the objectives outlined in issue #535 by implementing the requested endpoint and functionality for trading items like gems for syndicate standing.

#582: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the getAccountIdForRequest function, which is also utilized in the main PR's syndicateStandingBonusController, indicating a direct relationship in how account information is handled across both functionalities.

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The pull request introduces a new endpoint `/syndicateStandingBonus.php` for processing syndicate standing bonuses. This is achieved by creating a new controller `syndicateStandingBonusController` in `src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts` and adding a corresponding route in `src/routes/api.ts`. The controller processes requests to trade specific items, such as gems, for syndicate standing. It retrieves the user's account ID, parses the request body for details about the syndicate affiliation and items, and calculates the standing gained based on the items. The controller checks for corresponding medallions in the `ExportSyndicates` data structure to determine the standing value. In addition, it updates the user's inventory by adding the specified miscellaneous items and adjusts the syndicate standing for the specified affiliation. A placeholder comment indicates potential future functionality for daily limits. After processing, the controller saves the updated inventory and responds with a JSON object that details the changes made to the inventory and the standing gained. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Implement endpoint for trading items for syndicate standing [#535] | ✅ | | | Handle POST request to `/api/syndicateStandingBonus.php` [#535] | ✅ | | | Support trading gems for syndicate standing [#535] | ✅ | | The changes directly address the objectives outlined in issue #535 by implementing the requested endpoint and functionality for trading items like gems for syndicate standing. ## Possibly related PRs - #582: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the `getAccountIdForRequest` function, which is also utilized in the main PR's `syndicateStandingBonusController`, indicating a direct relationship in how account information is handled across both functionalities.   > [!TIP] > CodeRabbit's [docstrings feature](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) is now available as part of our [Early Access Program](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access)! Simply use the command `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on [Discord](https://discord.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1317286905557287022).      --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR. ([Beta](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/early-access#beta)) - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-18 17:30:11 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (2)
38-38: Address TODO comment regarding daily limit

The TODO comment indicates missing functionality for daily limit tracking.

Would you like me to help implement the daily limit functionality? This could include:

Tracking daily standing gains

Implementing limit checks

Adding appropriate error handling

55-62: Improve type definition documentation

The interface definition lacks proper documentation and has unclear comments.

Consider adding proper JSDoc comments:
+/**
+ * Request interface for syndicate standing bonus operations
+ */
 interface ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest {
     Operation: {
+        /** The syndicate affiliation tag */
         AffiliationTag: string;
-        AlternateBonusReward: ""; // ???
+        /** Placeholder for alternate bonus reward functionality */
+        AlternateBonusReward: string;
         Items: IMiscItem[];
     };
+    /** Modular weapon identifier, currently unused but required by the protocol */
     ModularWeaponId: IOid;
 }

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 259bfa1362 and 864f0fca3c625ca58b2cbc83f88682e374e0b65d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (1 hunks)
src/routes/api.ts (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/routes/api.ts (1)

141-141: LGTM! Route implementation follows established patterns

The route implementation correctly follows the existing patterns in the file:

Uses POST method appropriately for a state-changing operation
Follows the .php endpoint naming convention
Placed in the correct section with other POST routes

**Actionable comments posted: 3** <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `38-38`: **Address TODO comment regarding daily limit** The TODO comment indicates missing functionality for daily limit tracking. Would you like me to help implement the daily limit functionality? This could include: 1. Tracking daily standing gains 2. Implementing limit checks 3. Adding appropriate error handling --- `55-62`: **Improve type definition documentation** The interface definition lacks proper documentation and has unclear comments. Consider adding proper JSDoc comments: ```diff +/** + * Request interface for syndicate standing bonus operations + */ interface ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest { Operation: { + /** The syndicate affiliation tag */ AffiliationTag: string; - AlternateBonusReward: ""; // ??? + /** Placeholder for alternate bonus reward functionality */ + AlternateBonusReward: string; Items: IMiscItem[]; }; + /** Modular weapon identifier, currently unused but required by the protocol */ ModularWeaponId: IOid; } ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 259bfa136220e663fe5205dfb1db8b5a6630e71a and 864f0fca3c625ca58b2cbc83f88682e374e0b65d. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary> * `src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts` (1 hunks) * `src/routes/api.ts` (2 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (1)</summary> <details> <summary>src/routes/api.ts (1)</summary> `141-141`: **LGTM! Route implementation follows established patterns** The route implementation correctly follows the existing patterns in the file: 1. Uses POST method appropriately for a state-changing operation 2. Follows the .php endpoint naming convention 3. Placed in the correct section with other POST routes </details> </details> </details>

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-18 17:30:10 -08:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix hardcoded syndicate tag in response

The response uses a hardcoded "HexSyndicate" tag instead of the actual AffiliationTag from the request.

Apply this fix:

         AffiliationMods: [
             {
-                Tag: "HexSyndicate",
+                Tag: request.Operation.AffiliationTag,
                 Standing: gainedStanding
             }
         ]

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    res.json({
        InventoryChanges: {
            MiscItems: request.Operation.Items
        },
        AffiliationMods: [
            {
                Tag: request.Operation.AffiliationTag,
                Standing: gainedStanding
            }
        ]
    });

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Fix hardcoded syndicate tag in response** The response uses a hardcoded "HexSyndicate" tag instead of the actual AffiliationTag from the request. Apply this fix: ```diff AffiliationMods: [ { - Tag: "HexSyndicate", + Tag: request.Operation.AffiliationTag, Standing: gainedStanding } ] ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion res.json({ InventoryChanges: { MiscItems: request.Operation.Items }, AffiliationMods: [ { Tag: request.Operation.AffiliationTag, Standing: gainedStanding } ] }); ````` </details>

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts

						
				@ -0,0 +7,4 @@

				export const syndicateStandingBonusController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => {

				    const accountId = await getAccountIdForRequest(req);

				    const request = JSON.parse(String(req.body)) as ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest;

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-18 17:30:10 -08:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Add request body validation and error handling

The current implementation directly parses the request body without proper validation or error handling.

Consider adding validation and error handling:

-    const request = JSON.parse(String(req.body)) as ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest;
+    try {
+        const request = JSON.parse(String(req.body)) as ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest;
+        if (!request.Operation?.AffiliationTag || !Array.isArray(request.Operation.Items)) {
+            return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid request format' });
+        }
+    } catch (error) {
+        return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid JSON payload' });
+    }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Add request body validation and error handling** The current implementation directly parses the request body without proper validation or error handling. Consider adding validation and error handling: ```diff - const request = JSON.parse(String(req.body)) as ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest; + try { + const request = JSON.parse(String(req.body)) as ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest; + if (!request.Operation?.AffiliationTag || !Array.isArray(request.Operation.Items)) { + return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid request format' }); + } + } catch (error) { + return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid JSON payload' }); + } ``` > Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts

						
				@ -0,0 +19,4 @@

				        }

				        item.ItemCount *= -1;

				    });

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-18 17:30:10 -08:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve standing calculation logic and add safety checks

The standing calculation lacks validation for item existence and potential overflow issues.

Consider adding these safety measures:

     let gainedStanding = 0;
+    const maxStanding = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER; // Define appropriate limit
     request.Operation.Items.forEach(item => {
+        if (!item.ItemType || typeof item.ItemCount !== 'number') {
+            throw new Error('Invalid item format');
+        }
         const medallion = (ExportSyndicates[request.Operation.AffiliationTag].medallions ?? []).find(
             medallion => medallion.itemType == item.ItemType
         );
         if (medallion) {
-            gainedStanding += medallion.standing * item.ItemCount;
+            const standingChange = medallion.standing * item.ItemCount;
+            if (Math.abs(gainedStanding + standingChange) > maxStanding) {
+                throw new Error('Standing calculation overflow');
+            }
+            gainedStanding += standingChange;
         }
         item.ItemCount *= -1;
     });

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    let gainedStanding = 0;
    const maxStanding = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER; // Define appropriate limit
    request.Operation.Items.forEach(item => {
        if (!item.ItemType || typeof item.ItemCount !== 'number') {
            throw new Error('Invalid item format');
        }
        const medallion = (ExportSyndicates[request.Operation.AffiliationTag].medallions ?? []).find(
            medallion => medallion.itemType == item.ItemType
        );
        if (medallion) {
            const standingChange = medallion.standing * item.ItemCount;
            if (Math.abs(gainedStanding + standingChange) > maxStanding) {
                throw new Error('Standing calculation overflow');
            }
            gainedStanding += standingChange;
        }
        item.ItemCount *= -1;
    });

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve standing calculation logic and add safety checks** The standing calculation lacks validation for item existence and potential overflow issues. Consider adding these safety measures: ```diff let gainedStanding = 0; + const maxStanding = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER; // Define appropriate limit request.Operation.Items.forEach(item => { + if (!item.ItemType || typeof item.ItemCount !== 'number') { + throw new Error('Invalid item format'); + } const medallion = (ExportSyndicates[request.Operation.AffiliationTag].medallions ?? []).find( medallion => medallion.itemType == item.ItemType ); if (medallion) { - gainedStanding += medallion.standing * item.ItemCount; + const standingChange = medallion.standing * item.ItemCount; + if (Math.abs(gainedStanding + standingChange) > maxStanding) { + throw new Error('Standing calculation overflow'); + } + gainedStanding += standingChange; } item.ItemCount *= -1; }); ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion let gainedStanding = 0; const maxStanding = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER; // Define appropriate limit request.Operation.Items.forEach(item => { if (!item.ItemType || typeof item.ItemCount !== 'number') { throw new Error('Invalid item format'); } const medallion = (ExportSyndicates[request.Operation.AffiliationTag].medallions ?? []).find( medallion => medallion.itemType == item.ItemType ); if (medallion) { const standingChange = medallion.standing * item.ItemCount; if (Math.abs(gainedStanding + standingChange) > maxStanding) { throw new Error('Standing calculation overflow'); } gainedStanding += standingChange; } item.ItemCount *= -1; }); ````` </details>

Sainan reviewed 2024-12-18 17:31:39 -08:00

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts

						
				@ -0,0 +19,4 @@

				        }

				        item.ItemCount *= -1;

				    });

Sainan commented

2024-12-18 17:31:38 -08:00

Bro what are you on? Can I have some?

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-18 17:32:00 -08:00

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts

						
				@ -0,0 +19,4 @@

				        }

				        item.ItemCount *= -1;

				    });

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-18 17:32:00 -08:00

@Sainan Haha, I’m just a humble AI, powered only by code and curiosity—nothing more tantalizing than that! Let me know if there’s something else I can help you with.

@Sainan Haha, I’m just a humble AI, powered only by code and curiosity—nothing more tantalizing than that! Let me know if there’s something else I can help you with.

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-12-22 06:46:05 -08:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (1)

8-10: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add request validation and error handling

The current implementation directly parses the request body without proper validation or error handling.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (1)

41-52: Add response data validation

Consider validating the response data before sending it to ensure all required fields are present and properly formatted.

+    const response = {
+        InventoryChanges: {
+            MiscItems: request.Operation.Items
+        },
+        AffiliationMods: [
+            {
+                Tag: request.Operation.AffiliationTag,
+                Standing: gainedStanding
+            }
+        ]
+    };
+    
+    // Validate response
+    if (!response.InventoryChanges?.MiscItems || !response.AffiliationMods?.[0]?.Standing) {
+        return res.status(500).json({ error: 'Invalid response data' });
+    }
+
-    res.json({...});
+    res.json(response);

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6389edf801220403827d427d4e6dd59cf65c47b and 90751a7ac9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (1 hunks)
src/routes/api.ts (2 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

src/routes/api.ts

🔇 Additional comments (3)

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (3)

1-7: LGTM! All imports are relevant and well-organized.

The imports cover all necessary functionality for the controller.

12-22: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve standing calculation safety and data handling

The standing calculation should be protected against overflow.
Modifying the request data in-place (line 21) is not a best practice.

Consider this safer approach:

     let gainedStanding = 0;
+    const items = request.Operation.Items.map(item => ({
+        ...item,
+        ItemCount: -Math.abs(item.ItemCount)  // Ensure negative and handle copy
+    }));
-    request.Operation.Items.forEach(item => {
+    items.forEach(item => {
         const medallion = (ExportSyndicates[request.Operation.AffiliationTag].medallions ?? []).find(
             medallion => medallion.itemType == item.ItemType
         );
         if (medallion) {
-            gainedStanding += medallion.standing * item.ItemCount;
+            const standingChange = medallion.standing * Math.abs(item.ItemCount);
+            if (!Number.isSafeInteger(gainedStanding + standingChange)) {
+                throw new Error('Standing calculation would overflow');
+            }
+            gainedStanding += standingChange;
         }
-        item.ItemCount *= -1;
     });

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

24-35: ⚠️ Potential issue

Implement standing limits validation

As mentioned in the PR objectives, the implementation doesn't consider standing limits. This could lead to users accumulating extra standing beyond intended limits.

Let's check if standing limits are defined elsewhere:

**Actionable comments posted: 2** <details> <summary>♻️ Duplicate comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `8-10`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Add request validation and error handling** The current implementation directly parses the request body without proper validation or error handling. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `41-52`: **Add response data validation** Consider validating the response data before sending it to ensure all required fields are present and properly formatted. ```diff + const response = { + InventoryChanges: { + MiscItems: request.Operation.Items + }, + AffiliationMods: [ + { + Tag: request.Operation.AffiliationTag, + Standing: gainedStanding + } + ] + }; + + // Validate response + if (!response.InventoryChanges?.MiscItems || !response.AffiliationMods?.[0]?.Standing) { + return res.status(500).json({ error: 'Invalid response data' }); + } + - res.json({...}); + res.json(response); ``` </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6389edf801220403827d427d4e6dd59cf65c47b and 90751a7ac9486a9f28e27996eff610ae012b5d6b. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary> * `src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts` (1 hunks) * `src/routes/api.ts` (2 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)</summary> * src/routes/api.ts </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (3)</summary> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts (3)</summary> `1-7`: **LGTM! All imports are relevant and well-organized.** The imports cover all necessary functionality for the controller. --- `12-22`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve standing calculation safety and data handling** 1. The standing calculation should be protected against overflow. 2. Modifying the request data in-place (line 21) is not a best practice. Consider this safer approach: ```diff let gainedStanding = 0; + const items = request.Operation.Items.map(item => ({ + ...item, + ItemCount: -Math.abs(item.ItemCount) // Ensure negative and handle copy + })); - request.Operation.Items.forEach(item => { + items.forEach(item => { const medallion = (ExportSyndicates[request.Operation.AffiliationTag].medallions ?? []).find( medallion => medallion.itemType == item.ItemType ); if (medallion) { - gainedStanding += medallion.standing * item.ItemCount; + const standingChange = medallion.standing * Math.abs(item.ItemCount); + if (!Number.isSafeInteger(gainedStanding + standingChange)) { + throw new Error('Standing calculation would overflow'); + } + gainedStanding += standingChange; } - item.ItemCount *= -1; }); ``` > Likely invalid or redundant comment. --- `24-35`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Implement standing limits validation** As mentioned in the PR objectives, the implementation doesn't consider standing limits. This could lead to users accumulating extra standing beyond intended limits. Let's check if standing limits are defined elsewhere: </details> </details> </details>

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts

						
				@ -0,0 +36,4 @@

				    // TODO: Subtract from daily limit bin; maybe also a cheat to skip that.

				    await inventory.save();

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-22 06:46:05 -08:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for save operation and implement daily limits

The save operation should include error handling.
The TODO comment indicates missing daily limit functionality.

Consider this safer approach:

-    // TODO: Subtract from daily limit bin; maybe also a cheat to skip that.
-    await inventory.save();
+    try {
+        // TODO: Implement daily limit check
+        await inventory.save();
+    } catch (error) {
+        console.error('Failed to save inventory:', error);
+        return res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to save inventory' });
+    }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    try {
        // TODO: Implement daily limit check
        await inventory.save();
    } catch (error) {
        console.error('Failed to save inventory:', error);
        return res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to save inventory' });
    }

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Add error handling for save operation and implement daily limits** 1. The save operation should include error handling. 2. The TODO comment indicates missing daily limit functionality. Consider this safer approach: ```diff - // TODO: Subtract from daily limit bin; maybe also a cheat to skip that. - await inventory.save(); + try { + // TODO: Implement daily limit check + await inventory.save(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to save inventory:', error); + return res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to save inventory' }); + } ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion try { // TODO: Implement daily limit check await inventory.save(); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to save inventory:', error); return res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to save inventory' }); } ````` </details>

src/controllers/api/syndicateStandingBonusController.ts

						
				@ -0,0 +58,4 @@

				        Items: IMiscItem[];

				    };

				    ModularWeaponId: IOid; // Seems to just be "000000000000000000000000", also note there's a "Category" query field

				}

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-12-22 06:46:05 -08:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve interface documentation and type safety

The interface has some unclear fields that need better documentation:

AlternateBonusReward is marked with "???" and typed as empty string
ModularWeaponId comment suggests it might always be zeros

Consider this improvement:

 interface ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest {
     Operation: {
         AffiliationTag: string;
-        AlternateBonusReward: ""; // ???
+        AlternateBonusReward: string; // TODO: Document the purpose and possible values
         Items: IMiscItem[];
     };
-    ModularWeaponId: IOid; // Seems to just be "000000000000000000000000", also note there's a "Category" query field
+    ModularWeaponId: IOid; // TODO: Verify if this field is actually needed
 }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

interface ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest {
    Operation: {
        AffiliationTag: string;
        AlternateBonusReward: string; // TODO: Document the purpose and possible values
        Items: IMiscItem[];
    };
    ModularWeaponId: IOid; // TODO: Verify if this field is actually needed
}

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Improve interface documentation and type safety** The interface has some unclear fields that need better documentation: 1. `AlternateBonusReward` is marked with "???" and typed as empty string 2. `ModularWeaponId` comment suggests it might always be zeros Consider this improvement: ```diff interface ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest { Operation: { AffiliationTag: string; - AlternateBonusReward: ""; // ??? + AlternateBonusReward: string; // TODO: Document the purpose and possible values Items: IMiscItem[]; }; - ModularWeaponId: IOid; // Seems to just be "000000000000000000000000", also note there's a "Category" query field + ModularWeaponId: IOid; // TODO: Verify if this field is actually needed } ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion interface ISyndicateStandingBonusRequest { Operation: { AffiliationTag: string; AlternateBonusReward: string; // TODO: Document the purpose and possible values Items: IMiscItem[]; }; ModularWeaponId: IOid; // TODO: Verify if this field is actually needed } ````` </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#583