feat: rerolling rivens #806
8
package-lock.json
generated
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
|
||||
"copyfiles": "^2.4.1",
|
||||
"express": "^5",
|
||||
"mongoose": "^8.9.4",
|
||||
"warframe-public-export-plus": "^0.5.23",
|
||||
"warframe-public-export-plus": "^0.5.24",
|
||||
"warframe-riven-info": "^0.1.2",
|
||||
"winston": "^3.17.0",
|
||||
"winston-daily-rotate-file": "^5.0.0"
|
||||
@ -3778,9 +3778,9 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"node_modules/warframe-public-export-plus": {
|
||||
"version": "0.5.23",
|
||||
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/warframe-public-export-plus/-/warframe-public-export-plus-0.5.23.tgz",
|
||||
"integrity": "sha512-AJLivzXpon+UDm+SYq3wIXiP4OXCDOgXvCG1VLawJrHW3VDff+NpsUJApBPA4S8oZ8N8NPyBVKBvuoF2Pplaeg=="
|
||||
"version": "0.5.24",
|
||||
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/warframe-public-export-plus/-/warframe-public-export-plus-0.5.24.tgz",
|
||||
"integrity": "sha512-GHjOxFcfPaLbhs/1Adgk6y3qPJ7ptBO/sW2oQ4aSdDj68oETkDjHwDQrn4eFjaYKGOmVwAzVDPMgLKWaD/fmKg=="
|
||||
},
|
||||
"node_modules/warframe-riven-info": {
|
||||
"version": "0.1.2",
|
||||
|
||||
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
|
||||
"copyfiles": "^2.4.1",
|
||||
"express": "^5",
|
||||
"mongoose": "^8.9.4",
|
||||
"warframe-public-export-plus": "^0.5.23",
|
||||
"warframe-public-export-plus": "^0.5.24",
|
||||
"warframe-riven-info": "^0.1.2",
|
||||
"winston": "^3.17.0",
|
||||
"winston-daily-rotate-file": "^5.0.0"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,9 +1,102 @@
|
||||
|
|
||||
import { logger } from "@/src/utils/logger";
|
||||
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
import { RequestHandler } from "express";
|
||||
import { getAccountIdForRequest } from "@/src/services/loginService";
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
import { addMiscItems, getInventory } from "@/src/services/inventoryService";
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
import { getJSONfromString } from "@/src/helpers/stringHelpers";
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
import { ExportUpgrades } from "warframe-public-export-plus";
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
import { getRandomElement } from "@/src/services/rngService";
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
const rerollRandomModController: RequestHandler = (_req, res) => {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
logger.debug("RerollRandomMod Request", { info: _req.body.toString("hex").replace(/(.)(.)/g, "$1$2 ") });
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
res.json({});
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
export const rerollRandomModController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const accountId = await getAccountIdForRequest(req);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const request = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as RerollRandomModRequest;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
if ("ItemIds" in request) {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const inventory = await getInventory(accountId, "Upgrades MiscItems");
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.id(request.ItemIds[0])!;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const fingerprint = JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint!) as IUnveiledRivenFingerprint;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Add error handling for JSON parsing. The
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Add error handling for JSON parsing.**
The `getJSONfromString` call could throw if the request body is invalid JSON.
```diff
- const request = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as RerollRandomModRequest;
+ try {
+ const request = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as RerollRandomModRequest;
+ } catch (error) {
+ return res.status(400).json({ error: "Invalid request body" });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Sainan
commented
CAN YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY CAN YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY
@Sainan I apologize for any frustration caused. I'll be more selective with my review comments going forward. Would you like me to adjust my review settings or focus on specific types of issues only? ✏️ Learnings added
@Sainan I apologize for any frustration caused. I'll be more selective with my review comments going forward. Would you like me to adjust my review settings or focus on specific types of issues only?
---
<details>
<summary>✏️ Learnings added</summary>
```
Learnt from: Sainan
PR: spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer#806
File: src/controllers/api/rerollRandomModController.ts:10-10
Timestamp: 2025-01-18T15:00:11.410Z
Learning: For the repository spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer, the team prefers to handle JSON parsing errors at a higher level rather than adding try-catch blocks around individual JSON parsing calls.
```
> Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure [review instructions](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/review-instructions). You can manage existing learnings in the [app](https://app.coderabbit.ai/learnings).
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
fingerprint.rerolls ??= 0;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const kuvaCost = fingerprint.rerolls < rerollCosts.length ? rerollCosts[fingerprint.rerolls] : 3500;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
addMiscItems(inventory, [
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
ItemType: "/Lotus/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva",
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
ItemCount: kuvaCost * -1
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Add validation for rerolls count and kuva cost calculation. The current implementation could lead to NaN values if Apply this diff to add proper validation: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Add validation for rerolls count and kuva cost calculation.**
The current implementation could lead to NaN values if `fingerprint.rerolls` is undefined, causing inventory validation errors. This matches the reported error in the PR comments.
Apply this diff to add proper validation:
```diff
- fingerprint.rerolls ??= 0;
- const kuvaCost = fingerprint.rerolls < rerollCosts.length ? rerollCosts[fingerprint.rerolls] : 3500;
+ const currentRerolls = fingerprint.rerolls ?? 0;
+ if (typeof currentRerolls !== 'number' || isNaN(currentRerolls)) {
+ return res.status(400).json({ error: "Invalid reroll count" });
+ }
+ const kuvaCost = currentRerolls < rerollCosts.length ? rerollCosts[currentRerolls] : 3500;
+ fingerprint.rerolls = currentRerolls + 1;
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const currentRerolls = fingerprint.rerolls ?? 0;
if (typeof currentRerolls !== 'number' || isNaN(currentRerolls)) {
return res.status(400).json({ error: "Invalid reroll count" });
}
const kuvaCost = currentRerolls < rerollCosts.length ? rerollCosts[currentRerolls] : 3500;
fingerprint.rerolls = currentRerolls + 1;
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
fingerprint.rerolls++;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint = JSON.stringify(fingerprint);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Add kuva balance validation before deducting cost. The code attempts to deduct kuva without checking if the player has enough, which could lead to negative balances or validation errors. Apply this diff to add balance validation: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Add kuva balance validation before deducting cost.**
The code attempts to deduct kuva without checking if the player has enough, which could lead to negative balances or validation errors.
Apply this diff to add balance validation:
```diff
+ const kuvaItem = inventory.MiscItems?.find(x => x.ItemType === "/Lotus/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva");
+ if (!kuvaItem || kuvaItem.ItemCount < kuvaCost) {
+ return res.status(400).json({
+ error: "Insufficient kuva",
+ required: kuvaCost,
+ available: kuvaItem?.ItemCount ?? 0
+ });
+ }
addMiscItems(inventory, [
{
ItemType: "/Lotus/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva",
ItemCount: kuvaCost * -1
}
]);
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const kuvaItem = inventory.MiscItems?.find(x => x.ItemType === "/Lotus/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva");
if (!kuvaItem || kuvaItem.ItemCount < kuvaCost) {
return res.status(400).json({
error: "Insufficient kuva",
required: kuvaCost,
available: kuvaItem?.ItemCount ?? 0
});
}
addMiscItems(inventory, [
{
ItemType: "/Lotus/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva",
ItemCount: kuvaCost * -1
}
]);
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
randomiseStats(upgrade.ItemType, fingerprint);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint = JSON.stringify(fingerprint);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
await inventory.save();
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
res.json({
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Validate upgrade.ItemType before randomizing stats. The code passes Apply this diff to add validation: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Validate upgrade.ItemType before randomizing stats.**
The code passes `upgrade.ItemType` to `randomiseStats` without validation, which could cause runtime errors if the item type is invalid or not found in `ExportUpgrades`.
Apply this diff to add validation:
```diff
+ if (!upgrade.ItemType || !ExportUpgrades[upgrade.ItemType]) {
+ return res.status(400).json({ error: `Invalid upgrade type: ${upgrade.ItemType}` });
+ }
randomiseStats(upgrade.ItemType, fingerprint);
upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint = JSON.stringify(fingerprint);
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
if (!upgrade.ItemType || !ExportUpgrades[upgrade.ItemType]) {
return res.status(400).json({ error: `Invalid upgrade type: ${upgrade.ItemType}` });
}
randomiseStats(upgrade.ItemType, fingerprint);
upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint = JSON.stringify(fingerprint);
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
changes: [
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
ItemId: { $oid: request.ItemIds[0] },
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
UpgradeFingerprint: upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint,
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
PendingRerollFingerprint: upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
cost: kuvaCost
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const inventory = await getInventory(accountId, "Upgrades");
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.id(request.ItemId)!;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
if (request.CommitReroll && upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint) {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint = upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint = undefined;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
await inventory.save();
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
res.send(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Check for undefined When Apply this diff to ensure 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Check for undefined `PendingRerollFingerprint` before committing reroll.**
When `CommitReroll` is `true`, the code assigns `upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint` to `upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint` without verifying if `PendingRerollFingerprint` exists. This could result in `upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint` being set to `undefined`.
Apply this diff to ensure `PendingRerollFingerprint` is defined:
```diff
if (request.CommitReroll) {
+ if (upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint) {
upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint = upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint;
+ } else {
+ return res.status(400).json({ error: "No pending reroll to commit." });
+ }
}
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
if (upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint) {
upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint = upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint;
} else {
return res.status(400).json({ error: "No pending reroll to commit." });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export { rerollRandomModController };
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const randomiseStats = (randomModType: string, fingerprint: IUnveiledRivenFingerprint): void => {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const meta = ExportUpgrades[randomModType];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
fingerprint.buffs = [];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const numBuffs = 2 + Math.trunc(Math.random() * 2); // 2 or 3
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const buffEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(x => x.canBeBuff);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i != numBuffs; ++i) {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Check for undefined It's possible that Apply this diff to add a null check: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Check for undefined `meta` when accessing `ExportUpgrades[randomModType]`.**
It's possible that `randomModType` is not a key in `ExportUpgrades`, resulting in `meta` being `undefined`. Accessing `meta.upgradeEntries` would then cause a runtime error. It's important to check if `meta` exists before proceeding.
Apply this diff to add a null check:
```diff
const meta = ExportUpgrades[randomModType];
+ if (!meta) {
+ throw new Error(`No upgrade data found for mod type: ${randomModType}`);
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const meta = ExportUpgrades[randomModType];
if (!meta) {
throw new Error(`No upgrade data found for mod type: ${randomModType}`);
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const buffIndex = Math.trunc(Math.random() * buffEntries.length);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const entry = buffEntries[buffIndex];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
buffEntries.splice(buffIndex, 1);
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
fingerprint.curses = [];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
if (Math.random() < 0.5) {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent duplicate buff stats and add value range validation. The current implementation could potentially select the same buff multiple times and generates arbitrary stat values without proper bounds checking. Apply this diff to improve stat generation:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent duplicate buff stats and add value range validation.**
The current implementation could potentially select the same buff multiple times and generates arbitrary stat values without proper bounds checking.
Apply this diff to improve stat generation:
```diff
- const buffIndex = Math.trunc(Math.random() * buffEntries.length);
- const entry = buffEntries[buffIndex];
- fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
- buffEntries.splice(buffIndex, 1);
+ const entry = buffEntries.splice(Math.trunc(Math.random() * buffEntries.length), 1)[0];
+ if (!entry) {
+ throw new Error(`Not enough unique buffs available for ${randomModType}`);
+ }
+ // Generate value within the stat's min/max range
+ const minValue = entry.minValue ?? 0;
+ const maxValue = entry.maxValue ?? 100;
+ const value = Math.trunc(minValue + (Math.random() * (maxValue - minValue)));
+ fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: value });
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(x => x.canBeCurse));
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
type RerollRandomModRequest = LetsGoGamblingRequest | AwDangitRequest;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Apply the same value range validation to curse stats. Similar to buffs, curse stats should also have proper value range validation. Apply this diff to improve curse stat generation: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Apply the same value range validation to curse stats.**
Similar to buffs, curse stats should also have proper value range validation.
Apply this diff to improve curse stat generation:
```diff
- const entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(x => x.canBeCurse));
- fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
+ const curseEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(x => x.canBeCurse);
+ const entry = getRandomElement(curseEntries);
+ if (!entry) {
+ throw new Error(`No curse stats available for ${randomModType}`);
+ }
+ const minValue = entry.minValue ?? 0;
+ const maxValue = entry.maxValue ?? 100;
+ const value = Math.trunc(minValue + (Math.random() * (maxValue - minValue)));
+ fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: value });
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(x => x.canBeCurse);
const entry = getRandomElement(curseEntries);
if (!entry) {
throw new Error(`No curse stats available for ${randomModType}`);
}
const minValue = entry.minValue ?? 0;
const maxValue = entry.maxValue ?? 100;
const value = Math.trunc(minValue + (Math.random() * (maxValue - minValue)));
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: value });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
interface LetsGoGamblingRequest {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
ItemIds: string[];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
interface AwDangitRequest {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
ItemId: string;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
CommitReroll: boolean;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
interface IUnveiledRivenFingerprint {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
compat: string;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
lim: number;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
lvl: number;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
lvlReq: 0;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
rerolls?: number;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pol: string;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
buffs: IRivenStat[];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
curses: IRivenStat[];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
interface IRivenStat {
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
Tag: string;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
Value: number;
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
const rerollCosts = [900, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1700, 2000, 2350, 2750, 3150];
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
@ -283,10 +283,10 @@ RawUpgrades.set("toJSON", {
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
//TODO: find out what this is
|
||||
const upgradesSchema = new Schema(
|
||||
const upgradesSchema = new Schema<ICrewShipSalvagedWeaponSkin>(
|
||||
{
|
||||
UpgradeFingerprint: String,
|
||||
PendingRerollFingerprint: { type: String, required: false },
|
||||
ItemType: String
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ id: false }
|
||||
|
||||
@ -96,8 +96,11 @@ export const combineInventoryChanges = (InventoryChanges: IInventoryChanges, del
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export const getInventory = async (accountOwnerId: string): Promise<TInventoryDatabaseDocument> => {
|
||||
const inventory = await Inventory.findOne({ accountOwnerId: accountOwnerId });
|
||||
export const getInventory = async (
|
||||
accountOwnerId: string,
|
||||
projection: string | undefined = undefined
|
||||
): Promise<TInventoryDatabaseDocument> => {
|
||||
const inventory = await Inventory.findOne({ accountOwnerId: accountOwnerId }, projection);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!inventory) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Didn't find an inventory for ${accountOwnerId}`);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ export interface ISlots {
|
||||
export interface ICrewShipSalvagedWeaponSkin {
|
||||
ItemType: string;
|
||||
UpgradeFingerprint?: string;
|
||||
PendingRerollFingerprint?: string;
|
||||
ItemId?: IOid;
|
||||
_id?: Types.ObjectId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator
!without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.Apply this diff to add null checks:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.
Similarly, if none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeCurseset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.
If none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeBuffset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator
!when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.Apply this diff to add null checks:
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator
!without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.Apply this diff to add null checks:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.
Similarly, if none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeCurseset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.
If none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeBuffset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator
!when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.Apply this diff to add null checks: