feat: rerolling rivens #806
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ export const rerollRandomModController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => {
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
|
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
|
||||||
if (request.CommitReroll) {
|
if (request.CommitReroll && upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint) {
|
||||||
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
|||||||
upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint = upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint;
|
upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint = upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint = undefined;
|
upgrade.PendingRerollFingerprint = undefined;
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId)!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemId);
if (!upgrade) {
return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
}
if (request.CommitReroll) {
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses. Similarly, if none of the Apply this diff to check for curseable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.**
Similarly, if none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeCurse` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
```diff
+ const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
+ if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
+ // It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
+ break;
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeCurse) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const curseableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeCurse);
if (curseableEntries.length === 0) {
// It's acceptable for an upgrade to have no curses
break;
}
let entry = getRandomElement(curseableEntries);
fingerprint.curses.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs. If none of the Apply this diff to check for buffable entries: 📝 Committable suggestion
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.**
If none of the `meta.upgradeEntries` have `canBeBuff` set to `true`, the `while` loop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.
Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
```diff
+ const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
+ if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
+ }
- let entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
+ let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
- while (!entry.canBeBuff) {
- entry = getRandomElement(meta.upgradeEntries!);
- }
```
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
const buffableEntries = meta.upgradeEntries!.filter(entry => entry.canBeBuff);
if (buffableEntries.length === 0) {
throw new Error("No available buffs for this upgrade type.");
}
let entry = getRandomElement(buffableEntries);
fingerprint.buffs.push({ Tag: entry.tag, Value: Math.trunc(Math.random() * 0x40000000) });
}
`````
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
⚠️ Potential issue Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades. Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator Apply this diff to add null checks:
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.**
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator `!` when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.
Apply this diff to add null checks:
```diff
- const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0])!;
+ const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id?.toString() == request.ItemIds[0]);
+ if (!upgrade) {
+ return res.status(404).json({ error: "Upgrade not found in inventory." });
+ }
```
> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
|||||||
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator
!without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.Apply this diff to add null checks:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.
Similarly, if none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeCurseset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.
If none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeBuffset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator
!when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.Apply this diff to add null checks:
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Similar to the previous case, the code uses the null assertion operator
!without checking if the upgrade exists. This may lead to runtime errors if the upgrade is not found.Apply this diff to add null checks:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting curses.
Similarly, if none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeCurseset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. Ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a curse before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for curseable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Prevent potential infinite loops when selecting buffs.
If none of the
meta.upgradeEntrieshavecanBeBuffset totrue, thewhileloop will result in an infinite loop. To prevent this, ensure that there is at least one entry that can be a buff before entering the loop.Apply this diff to check for buffable entries:
📝 Committable suggestion
⚠️ Potential issue
Handle potential null references when accessing inventory upgrades.
Currently, the code uses the null assertion operator
!when accessing the upgrade in the inventory without checking if it exists. If the upgrade is not found, this will cause a runtime error. It's important to add a null check to handle cases where the upgrade may not exist.Apply this diff to add null checks: