feat: implement upgrading & downgrading arcanes #520

Merged
Sainan merged 1 commits from arcanes into main 2024-10-06 08:43:43 -07:00
2 changed files with 79 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
import { RequestHandler } from "express";
import { getJSONfromString } from "@/src/helpers/stringHelpers";
import { getAccountIdForRequest } from "@/src/services/loginService";
import { getInventory, addMods } from "@/src/services/inventoryService";
import { IOid } from "@/src/types/commonTypes";
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-misused-promises
export const arcaneCommonController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => {
const accountId = await getAccountIdForRequest(req);
const json = getJSONfromString(String(req.body)) as IArcaneCommonRequest;
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:09:39 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

💡 Codebase verification

Redundant Parsing of req.body Detected

Since the express.json() middleware is already in use (src/app.ts), you can use req.body directly without additional parsing in src/controllers/api/arcaneCommonController.ts.

  • Line 10: Remove getJSONfromString(String(req.body)).
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the necessity of parsing req.body

At line 10, req.body is being converted to a string and then parsed with getJSONfromString. If the Express app is using body-parsing middleware like express.json(), req.body is already parsed as an object.

Ensure that req.body is not already parsed to avoid redundant parsing or potential errors.

Run the following script to check if express.json() middleware is in use:

If express.json() is already used, you can directly use req.body without additional parsing.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the app uses express.json() middleware.

# Search for usage of express.json() in the project
rg "app\.use\(\s*express\.json\(\s*\)\s*\)" --type javascript --type typescript

Length of output: 116


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the app uses express.json() middleware.

# Search for usage of express.json() in the project with correct file types
rg "app\.use\(\s*express\.json\(\s*\)\s*\)" --type js --type ts

Length of output: 101

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Redundant Parsing of `req.body` Detected** Since the `express.json()` middleware is already in use (`src/app.ts`), you can use `req.body` directly without additional parsing in `src/controllers/api/arcaneCommonController.ts`. - **Line 10**: Remove `getJSONfromString(String(req.body))`. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Verify the necessity of parsing `req.body`** At line 10, `req.body` is being converted to a string and then parsed with `getJSONfromString`. If the Express app is using body-parsing middleware like `express.json()`, `req.body` is already parsed as an object. Ensure that `req.body` is not already parsed to avoid redundant parsing or potential errors. Run the following script to check if `express.json()` middleware is in use: If `express.json()` is already used, you can directly use `req.body` without additional parsing. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the app uses express.json() middleware. # Search for usage of express.json() in the project rg "app\.use\(\s*express\.json\(\s*\)\s*\)" --type javascript --type typescript ``` Length of output: 116 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the app uses express.json() middleware. # Search for usage of express.json() in the project with correct file types rg "app\.use\(\s*express\.json\(\s*\)\s*\)" --type js --type ts ``` Length of output: 101 </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Review

kill yourself

kill yourself
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:22:49 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

@Sainan, I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling this way. If there's anything I can assist you with, please let me know.

(/._.)

@Sainan, I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling this way. If there's anything I can assist you with, please let me know. (/._.) <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
const inventory = await getInventory(accountId);
const upgrade = inventory.Upgrades.find(x => x._id!.toString() == json.arcane.ItemId.$oid);
if (json.newRank == -1) {
// Break down request?
if (!upgrade || !upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) {
throw new Error(`Failed to find upgrade with OID ${json.arcane.ItemId.$oid}`);
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:09:39 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

⚠️ Potential issue

Handle errors properly in async Express middleware

At line 16, throwing an error with throw new Error(...) in an async Express middleware does not automatically send an error response to the client and may result in unhandled promise rejections.

Modify the function signature to include the next parameter and pass the error to it, allowing Express to handle it properly.

Example:

-export const arcaneCommonController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => {
+export const arcaneCommonController: RequestHandler = async (req, res, next) => {
     ...
     if (!upgrade || !upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) {
-        throw new Error(`Failed to find upgrade with OID ${json.arcane.ItemId.$oid}`);
+        return next(new Error(`Failed to find upgrade with OID ${json.arcane.ItemId.$oid}`));
     }
     ...

Ensure that all errors within the middleware are passed to next(error) for consistent error handling.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Handle errors properly in async Express middleware** At line 16, throwing an error with `throw new Error(...)` in an async Express middleware does not automatically send an error response to the client and may result in unhandled promise rejections. Modify the function signature to include the `next` parameter and pass the error to it, allowing Express to handle it properly. Example: ```diff -export const arcaneCommonController: RequestHandler = async (req, res) => { +export const arcaneCommonController: RequestHandler = async (req, res, next) => { ... if (!upgrade || !upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) { - throw new Error(`Failed to find upgrade with OID ${json.arcane.ItemId.$oid}`); + return next(new Error(`Failed to find upgrade with OID ${json.arcane.ItemId.$oid}`)); } ... ``` Ensure that all errors within the middleware are passed to `next(error)` for consistent error handling. > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence. <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Review

kill yourself

kill yourself
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:21:06 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

@Sainan, I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling this way. If there's anything I can assist you with, please let me know.

(_/)
( •_•)
(/ )💭

@Sainan, I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling this way. If there's anything I can assist you with, please let me know. (\_/) ( •_•) (/ \)💭 <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
}
// Remove Upgrade
inventory.Upgrades.pull({ _id: json.arcane.ItemId.$oid });
// Add RawUpgrades
const numRawUpgradesToGive = arcaneLevelCounts[JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl];
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:09:39 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

⚠️ Potential issue

Define UpgradeFingerprint interface to ensure type safety

At line 23, you are parsing upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint and accessing .lvl, but since JSON.parse returns an any type, this leads to unsafe member access. To fix this, define a TypeScript interface for the UpgradeFingerprint and cast the parsed object accordingly.

First, define the interface after line 65:

 const arcaneLevelCounts = [0, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21];

+interface UpgradeFingerprint {
+    lvl: number;
+}

 interface IArcaneCommonRequest {
     arcane: {

Then, update line 23:

 const numRawUpgradesToGive = arcaneLevelCounts[
-    JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl
+    (JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) as UpgradeFingerprint).lvl
 ];

This change ensures that TypeScript knows the structure of the parsed object, avoiding any type usage and the associated warnings.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[warning] 23-23:
Computed name [JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl] resolves to an any value


[warning] 23-23:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[warning] 23-23:
Computed name [JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl] resolves to an any value


[warning] 23-23:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[warning] 23-23:
Computed name [JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl] resolves to an any value


[warning] 23-23:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Define `UpgradeFingerprint` interface to ensure type safety** At line 23, you are parsing `upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint` and accessing `.lvl`, but since `JSON.parse` returns an `any` type, this leads to unsafe member access. To fix this, define a TypeScript interface for the `UpgradeFingerprint` and cast the parsed object accordingly. First, define the interface after line 65: ```diff const arcaneLevelCounts = [0, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21]; +interface UpgradeFingerprint { + lvl: number; +} interface IArcaneCommonRequest { arcane: { ``` Then, update line 23: ```diff const numRawUpgradesToGive = arcaneLevelCounts[ - JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl + (JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) as UpgradeFingerprint).lvl ]; ``` This change ensures that TypeScript knows the structure of the parsed object, avoiding `any` type usage and the associated warnings. > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 23-23: Computed name [JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl] resolves to an `any` value --- [warning] 23-23: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 23-23: Computed name [JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl] resolves to an `any` value --- [warning] 23-23: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 23-23: Computed name [JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl] resolves to an `any` value --- [warning] 23-23: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Review

kill yourself

kill yourself
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:21:09 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

@Sainan, I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling this way. If there's anything I can assist you with, please let me know.

(\_/)
( •_•)
(/    Concerned bunny is here for you.)
@Sainan, I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling this way. If there's anything I can assist you with, please let me know. ``` (\_/) ( •_•) (/ Concerned bunny is here for you.) ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
addMods(inventory, [
{
ItemType: json.arcane.ItemType,
ItemCount: numRawUpgradesToGive
}
]);
res.json({ upgradeId: json.arcane.ItemId.$oid, numConsumed: numRawUpgradesToGive });
} else {
// Upgrade request?
let numConsumed = arcaneLevelCounts[json.newRank];
let upgradeId = json.arcane.ItemId.$oid;
if (upgrade) {
// Have an existing Upgrade item?
if (upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) {
const existingLevel = JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl;
numConsumed -= arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel];
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:09:38 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

⚠️ Potential issue

Cast parsed UpgradeFingerprint to UpgradeFingerprint interface

At line 39, existingLevel is assigned from JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl, which is of type any, leading to unsafe member access and assignment. By casting the parsed object to UpgradeFingerprint, you ensure type safety.

Update the code as follows:

 const existingLevel = 
-    JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl;
+    (JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) as UpgradeFingerprint).lvl;

 numConsumed -= arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel];

This eliminates the unsafe any usage and ensures existingLevel is correctly typed as a number.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

                const existingLevel = (JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) as UpgradeFingerprint).lvl;
                numConsumed -= arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel];
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe assignment of an any value


[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value


[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe assignment of an any value


[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value


[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe assignment of an any value


[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value


[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Cast parsed `UpgradeFingerprint` to `UpgradeFingerprint` interface** At line 39, `existingLevel` is assigned from `JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl`, which is of type `any`, leading to unsafe member access and assignment. By casting the parsed object to `UpgradeFingerprint`, you ensure type safety. Update the code as follows: ```diff const existingLevel = - JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint).lvl; + (JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) as UpgradeFingerprint).lvl; numConsumed -= arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel]; ``` This eliminates the unsafe `any` usage and ensures `existingLevel` is correctly typed as a `number`. <!-- suggestion_start --> <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion const existingLevel = (JSON.parse(upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint) as UpgradeFingerprint).lvl; numConsumed -= arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel]; ````` </details> <!-- suggestion_end --> <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 39-39: Unsafe assignment of an `any` value --- [warning] 39-39: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value --- [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 39-39: Unsafe assignment of an `any` value --- [warning] 39-39: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value --- [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 39-39: Unsafe assignment of an `any` value --- [warning] 39-39: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value --- [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Review

kill yourself

kill yourself
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:20:50 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

@Sainan

Understood.

(_/)
( •_•)
/ 💙

@Sainan Understood. (\_/) ( •_•) / 💙 <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
}
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:09:39 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

⚠️ Potential issue

Add input validation for json.newRank to prevent potential errors

The value of json.newRank is used as an index into arcaneLevelCounts in lines 34 and 40. If json.newRank is out of bounds (e.g., negative or exceeding the array length), this will result in undefined behavior or runtime errors.

Consider adding input validation to ensure json.newRank is within the valid range.

Example:

 if (json.newRank == -1) {
     // Handle downgrade request
     ...
 } else {
+    if (json.newRank < 0 || json.newRank >= arcaneLevelCounts.length) {
+        return res.status(400).json({ error: `Invalid newRank value: ${json.newRank}` });
+    }
     // Handle upgrade request
     let numConsumed = arcaneLevelCounts[json.newRank];
     ...
 }

This validation will prevent unexpected errors and ensure that only valid ranks are processed.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe assignment of an any value


[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value


[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe assignment of an any value


[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value


[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe assignment of an any value


[warning] 39-39:
Unsafe member access .lvl on an any value


[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Add input validation for `json.newRank` to prevent potential errors** The value of `json.newRank` is used as an index into `arcaneLevelCounts` in lines 34 and 40. If `json.newRank` is out of bounds (e.g., negative or exceeding the array length), this will result in undefined behavior or runtime errors. Consider adding input validation to ensure `json.newRank` is within the valid range. Example: ```diff if (json.newRank == -1) { // Handle downgrade request ... } else { + if (json.newRank < 0 || json.newRank >= arcaneLevelCounts.length) { + return res.status(400).json({ error: `Invalid newRank value: ${json.newRank}` }); + } // Handle upgrade request let numConsumed = arcaneLevelCounts[json.newRank]; ... } ``` This validation will prevent unexpected errors and ensure that only valid ranks are processed. > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 39-39: Unsafe assignment of an `any` value --- [warning] 39-39: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value --- [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 39-39: Unsafe assignment of an `any` value --- [warning] 39-39: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value --- [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 39-39: Unsafe assignment of an `any` value --- [warning] 39-39: Unsafe member access .lvl on an `any` value --- [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:09:39 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure numConsumed does not become negative

At line 40, numConsumed is adjusted by subtracting arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel]. If existingLevel is greater than json.newRank, numConsumed becomes negative, which may not be intended behavior.

Add a check to prevent numConsumed from being negative, or adjust the logic to handle downgrades appropriately.

Example:

 numConsumed -= arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel];
+if (numConsumed < 0) {
+    numConsumed = 0;
+}

Alternatively, ensure that upgrades only proceed when json.newRank is greater than existingLevel, and handle downgrades in the appropriate block.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)

[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)

[warning] 40-40:
Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an any value

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Ensure `numConsumed` does not become negative** At line 40, `numConsumed` is adjusted by subtracting `arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel]`. If `existingLevel` is greater than `json.newRank`, `numConsumed` becomes negative, which may not be intended behavior. Add a check to prevent `numConsumed` from being negative, or adjust the logic to handle downgrades appropriately. Example: ```diff numConsumed -= arcaneLevelCounts[existingLevel]; +if (numConsumed < 0) { + numConsumed = 0; +} ``` Alternatively, ensure that upgrades only proceed when `json.newRank` is greater than `existingLevel`, and handle downgrades in the appropriate block. > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (22)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 GitHub Check: build (18)</summary><blockquote> [warning] 40-40: Computed name [existingLevel] resolves to an `any` value </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Review

kill yourself

kill yourself
Review

kill yourself

kill yourself
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:20:56 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

@Sainan, I'm here to help if there's anything you need assistance with.

(•́_•̀)

@Sainan, I'm here to help if there's anything you need assistance with. (•́_•̀) <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:21:25 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

@Sainan, understood. If you need any assistance, please let me know.

( ._.)

@Sainan, understood. If you need any assistance, please let me know. ( ._.) <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
upgrade.UpgradeFingerprint = JSON.stringify({ lvl: json.newRank });
} else {
const newLength = inventory.Upgrades.push({
ItemType: json.arcane.ItemType,
UpgradeFingerprint: JSON.stringify({ lvl: json.newRank })
});
upgradeId = inventory.Upgrades[newLength - 1]._id!.toString();
}
// Remove RawUpgrades
addMods(inventory, [
{
ItemType: json.arcane.ItemType,
ItemCount: numConsumed * -1
}
]);
res.json({ newLevel: json.newRank, numConsumed, upgradeId });
}
await inventory.save();
};
const arcaneLevelCounts = [0, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21];
interface IArcaneCommonRequest {
arcane: {
ItemType: string;
ItemId: IOid;
FromSKU: boolean;
UpgradeFingerprint: string;
PendingRerollFingerprint: string;
ItemCount: number;
LastAdded: IOid;
};
newRank: number;
}

View File

@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
import express from "express"; import express from "express";
import { addFriendImageController } from "@/src/controllers/api/addFriendImageController"; import { addFriendImageController } from "@/src/controllers/api/addFriendImageController";
import { arcaneCommonController } from "@/src/controllers/api/arcaneCommonController";
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:09:38 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

💡 Codebase verification

Missing Supporting Components and Tests for arcaneCommon Functionality

The implementation of the new "arcaneCommon" functionality in src/routes/api.ts adds the necessary controller logic. However, the following supporting components and tests are missing:

  • Related Model Files: No files found matching src/models/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$.
  • Related Service Files: No files found matching src/services/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$.
  • Unit Tests: No unit tests found matching tests/.*arcaneCommon.*\.test\.ts$.

To ensure complete and robust implementation:

  1. Add Model Files: Define the necessary data models for managing arcane entities.
  2. Add Service Files: Implement services to handle business logic related to arcane operations.
  3. Write Unit Tests: Create unit tests to verify the functionality of the new controller and related components.
🔗 Analysis chain

Summary: Implementation aligns with PR objectives

The changes in this file successfully add support for the new "arcaneCommon" functionality, which aligns with the PR objectives to implement upgrading & downgrading arcanes. The modifications are minimal and focused, following the existing patterns in the file.

To ensure full implementation:

  1. Verify that the arcaneCommonController is properly implemented with the necessary logic for upgrading and downgrading arcanes.
  2. Check if any related models or services have been updated or created to support this new functionality.
  3. Ensure that appropriate unit tests have been added for the new controller and any related components.

To verify the complete implementation, please run the following script:

This script will help verify:

  1. The existence of related model files.
  2. The existence of related service files.
  3. The presence of unit tests for the new functionality.
  4. The handling of both upgrade and downgrade operations in the controller.

Also applies to: 105-105

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the complete implementation of arcaneCommon functionality

# Test 1: Check for related model files
echo "Checking for related model files:"
fd -p "src/models/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$"

# Test 2: Check for related service files
echo "Checking for related service files:"
fd -p "src/services/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$"

# Test 3: Check for unit tests
echo "Checking for unit tests:"
fd -p "tests/.*arcaneCommon.*\.test\.ts$"

# Test 4: Verify the controller handles both upgrade and downgrade
echo "Verifying upgrade and downgrade handling in controller:"
rg -U "(?s)(upgrade|downgrade).*?newRank" src/controllers/api/arcaneCommonController.ts

Length of output: 2536

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Missing Supporting Components and Tests for arcaneCommon Functionality** The implementation of the new "arcaneCommon" functionality in `src/routes/api.ts` adds the necessary controller logic. However, the following supporting components and tests are missing: - **Related Model Files:** No files found matching `src/models/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$`. - **Related Service Files:** No files found matching `src/services/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$`. - **Unit Tests:** No unit tests found matching `tests/.*arcaneCommon.*\.test\.ts$`. To ensure complete and robust implementation: 1. **Add Model Files:** Define the necessary data models for managing arcane entities. 2. **Add Service Files:** Implement services to handle business logic related to arcane operations. 3. **Write Unit Tests:** Create unit tests to verify the functionality of the new controller and related components. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Summary: Implementation aligns with PR objectives** The changes in this file successfully add support for the new "arcaneCommon" functionality, which aligns with the PR objectives to implement upgrading & downgrading arcanes. The modifications are minimal and focused, following the existing patterns in the file. To ensure full implementation: 1. Verify that the `arcaneCommonController` is properly implemented with the necessary logic for upgrading and downgrading arcanes. 2. Check if any related models or services have been updated or created to support this new functionality. 3. Ensure that appropriate unit tests have been added for the new controller and any related components. To verify the complete implementation, please run the following script: This script will help verify: 1. The existence of related model files. 2. The existence of related service files. 3. The presence of unit tests for the new functionality. 4. The handling of both upgrade and downgrade operations in the controller. Also applies to: 105-105 </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete implementation of arcaneCommon functionality # Test 1: Check for related model files echo "Checking for related model files:" fd -p "src/models/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$" # Test 2: Check for related service files echo "Checking for related service files:" fd -p "src/services/.*[Aa]rcane.*\.ts$" # Test 3: Check for unit tests echo "Checking for unit tests:" fd -p "tests/.*arcaneCommon.*\.test\.ts$" # Test 4: Verify the controller handles both upgrade and downgrade echo "Verifying upgrade and downgrade handling in controller:" rg -U "(?s)(upgrade|downgrade).*?newRank" src/controllers/api/arcaneCommonController.ts ``` Length of output: 2536 </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Review

kill yourself

kill yourself
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-06 08:20:48 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

@Sainan, understood.

(_/)
(•_•)
/ \

@Sainan, understood. (\_/) (•_•) / \ <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
import { artifactsController } from "../controllers/api/artifactsController"; import { artifactsController } from "../controllers/api/artifactsController";
import { checkDailyMissionBonusController } from "@/src/controllers/api/checkDailyMissionBonusController"; import { checkDailyMissionBonusController } from "@/src/controllers/api/checkDailyMissionBonusController";
import { claimCompletedRecipeController } from "@/src/controllers/api/claimCompletedRecipeController"; import { claimCompletedRecipeController } from "@/src/controllers/api/claimCompletedRecipeController";
@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ apiRouter.get("/updateSession.php", updateSessionGetController);
// post // post
apiRouter.post("/addFriendImage.php", addFriendImageController); apiRouter.post("/addFriendImage.php", addFriendImageController);
apiRouter.post("/arcaneCommon.php", arcaneCommonController);
apiRouter.post("/artifacts.php", artifactsController); apiRouter.post("/artifacts.php", artifactsController);
apiRouter.post("/claimCompletedRecipe.php", claimCompletedRecipeController); apiRouter.post("/claimCompletedRecipe.php", claimCompletedRecipeController);
apiRouter.post("/createGuild.php", createGuildController); apiRouter.post("/createGuild.php", createGuildController);