fix: missing vendor infos #565

Sainan · 2024-10-18T06:24:32-07:00

VampireKitten commented

2024-10-18 06:24:32 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

If there's any missing, please do mention it, but I think I got them all. Fixes #562. Fixes #560.

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-10-18 06:24:40 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the getVendorInfoController enhance its functionality by adding support for multiple new vendor manifests from various regions, including Deimos, Solaris, Ostron, and Duviri. This update involves the addition of several JSON files that contain structured data regarding vendor offerings, which include identifiers, type names, and item manifests detailing available products. The controller's switch statement has been modified to include new cases for these vendors, allowing it to return the appropriate JSON data based on the vendor specified in the request. The existing case for the Archimedean vendor remains but has been repositioned to accommodate the new vendor cases. This expansion allows for a broader range of vendor information retrieval and improves the overall capability of the API.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Acrithis has no Vendor Manifest (562)	✅
Ticker has no Vendor Manifest (560)	❌	The changes do not include a manifest for Ticker.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The recent changes to the `getVendorInfoController` enhance its functionality by adding support for multiple new vendor manifests from various regions, including Deimos, Solaris, Ostron, and Duviri. This update involves the addition of several JSON files that contain structured data regarding vendor offerings, which include identifiers, type names, and item manifests detailing available products. The controller's switch statement has been modified to include new cases for these vendors, allowing it to return the appropriate JSON data based on the vendor specified in the request. The existing case for the Archimedean vendor remains but has been repositioned to accommodate the new vendor cases. This expansion allows for a broader range of vendor information retrieval and improves the overall capability of the API. ## Assessment against linked issues | Objective | Addressed | Explanation | |-------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------| | Acrithis has no Vendor Manifest (562) | ✅ | | | Ticker has no Vendor Manifest (560) | ❌ | The changes do not include a manifest for Ticker. |         --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

Sainan approved these changes 2024-10-18 06:33:09 -07:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-18 06:38:27 -07:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 12

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (41)

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json (3)

1-7: LGTM! Consider clarifying the expiry date usage.

The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-organized and consistent with typical vendor information schemas. The use of ObjectId for _id is appropriate for unique identification, and the TypeName provides clear information about the vendor type and location.

The Expiry date is set to a very distant future (approximately year 2286). If this is intentional (e.g., to represent "never expires"), consider adding a comment explaining this choice or using a more explicit representation of "no expiry".

Also applies to: 54-61

7-53: LGTM! Consider clarifying PremiumPrice and item Expiry usage.

The ItemManifest array and its item structures are well-defined and consistent. The use of path-like strings for StoreItem allows for clear item identification.

The PremiumPrice array contains two identical values for each item. If this is intentional, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this duplication.

Each item has an Expiry field that matches the top-level Expiry. If these will always be the same, consider removing the item-level Expiry to reduce redundancy. If they can differ, ensure that the current identical values are intentional.

8-52: LGTM! Consider documenting Bin values.

The variety of items in the ItemManifest is appropriate for a Deimos Prospector vendor, with a good mix of gem types and rarities. The variation in PremiumPrice and QuantityMultiplier logically reflects different values for different gem types.

The Bin values ("BIN_0" and "BIN_1") are used consistently but their meaning is not immediately clear. Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining what these bin values represent (e.g., different categories, storage locations, or pricing tiers).

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json (1)

8-52: LGTM! Consider documenting Bin values.

The structure and properties of individual items in the ItemManifest are logically consistent. The pricing and quantity differences between rare and common gems make sense.

Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining the significance of the Bin values (e.g., "BIN_0" for common gems, "BIN_1" for rare gems). This would improve code readability and maintainability.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json (1)

1-94: Overall consistency is good, with minor suggestions for improvement

The file maintains excellent internal consistency in structure and data representation. However, consider the following suggestions:

The use of far-future expiry dates (9999999000000) is consistent but might benefit from a more specific explanation or a more meaningful representation (e.g., null for "never expires").

The purpose of the PropertyTextHash is not immediately clear. Consider adding a comment or documentation to explain its usage.

Would you like me to propose a modified version of the file incorporating these suggestions?

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabsCommisionsManifest.json (1)

35-88: LGTM! Second and third ItemManifest entries maintain consistency.

The second and third items in the ItemManifest array maintain the same well-structured format as the first item, which is excellent for consistency and ease of parsing. The varying Bin values ("BIN_2", "BIN_1", "BIN_0") suggest a potential priority or categorization system, which adds depth to the vendor structure.

Suggestion: Consider if the consistent PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase values across all items are intentional. If different items might require different purchase rules in the future, it may be beneficial to make these fields more flexible.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json (2)
9-9: Add documentation for StoreItem paths and Bin values

The StoreItem paths and Bin values seem to encode important information about the items. To improve maintainability and understanding of the data structure, consider adding documentation or comments explaining:

The structure of the StoreItem paths (e.g., what each segment represents).

The meaning and purpose of the different Bin values.

You could add a comment at the beginning of the JSON file or in a separate documentation file explaining these details. For example:
{
  "_comment": "StoreItem path structure: /Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/Fish/Eidolon/FishParts/[TimeOfDay][Rarity]Fish[Part]PartItem",
  "_comment": "Bin values: BIN_0 represents common items, BIN_1 represents uncommon items",
  "VendorInfo": {
    // ... rest of the JSON structure
  }
}
Also applies to: 24-24, 39-39, 54-54, 69-69, 84-84

1-106: Approve overall structure with minor suggestions

The JSON structure is well-formed, consistent, and follows good practices for data organization. The use of $oid for ObjectIds and the consistent formatting throughout the file are commendable.

To further improve the file:

Consider adding a top-level comment or separate documentation explaining the purpose and structure of this vendor manifest file.

Provide documentation for the PropertyTextHash field, explaining its purpose and how it's used in the application.

Example:
{
  "_comment": "This file represents the vendor manifest for the Ostron Fishmonger, containing item details and pricing information.",
  "_comment": "PropertyTextHash: [Explanation of what this hash represents and how it's used]",
  "VendorInfo": {
    // ... rest of the JSON structure
  }
}
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json (2)
1-6: LGTM! Consider adding a newline for improved readability.

The main VendorInfo structure is well-formed and uses appropriate data types. The "_id" field correctly uses the MongoDB ObjectId format, and the "TypeName" follows a consistent path structure for vendor types.

Consider adding a newline after line 2 to separate the main object from its contents:
 {
   "VendorInfo": {
+
     "_id": {
       "$oid": "5b0de8556df82a56ea9bae82"
     },
This small change can improve readability, especially as the file grows.

98-106: Clarify PropertyTextHash usage and consider Expiry date redundancy.

The additional VendorInfo properties are well-structured. However:

Could you provide documentation or a comment explaining the purpose and usage of the PropertyTextHash? This would help future maintainers understand its significance.

The Expiry date at the VendorInfo level matches the item-level expiries. Consider if this redundancy is necessary, or if it would be more efficient to have a single Expiry at the VendorInfo level and only specify different dates for items that expire earlier.

Consider adding a comment explaining the PropertyTextHash:
     ],
+    // PropertyTextHash is used for [explain purpose here]
     "PropertyTextHash": "946131D0CF5CDF7C2C03BB967DE0DF49",
     "Expiry": {
       "$date": {
         "$numberLong": "9999999000000"
       }
     }
   }
 }
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1)

7-97: LGTM: ItemManifest structure is consistent and comprehensive.

The ItemManifest array correctly includes multiple Deimos fish part items, each with a complete set of properties. This structure allows for efficient retrieval and display of vendor items.

Consider optimizing the PremiumPrice property. Currently, it's an array with two identical values (e.g., [9, 9]). If this duplication is intentional, please add a comment explaining its purpose. Otherwise, consider simplifying it to a single value.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest.json (2)
7-118: LGTM! Consider adding item descriptions.

The ItemManifest array structure is well-organized and consistent across all items. Each item contains all necessary information for vendor transactions.

To enhance user experience and provide more context, consider adding a "Description" field for each item. This could help users understand the purpose or benefits of each item without needing to reference external documentation.

Example addition:
{
  "StoreItem": "/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/ShipDecos/Venus/SUToolBox",
  "Description": "A versatile toolbox for ship maintenance and repairs.",
  // ... other existing fields
}
10-16: LGTM! Consider diversifying product categories.

The ItemPrices structure provides flexibility for multiple pricing options and currency types, which is excellent for complex economies within the game.

However, I noticed that the ProductCategory is consistently set to "MiscItems" for all items. Consider diversifying the product categories to provide more specific classifications. This could improve filtering and categorization in the user interface and potentially aid in analytics.

For example:
{
  "ItemPrices": [
    {
      "ItemType": "/Lotus/Types/Items/Solaris/DebtTokenB",
      "ItemCount": 6,
      "ProductCategory": "ShipDecorations"
    }
  ]
}
To verify the current usage of ProductCategory across all vendor manifests, you can run:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ProductCategory usage in all vendor manifest files
rg -g '*.json' -i '"ProductCategory":\s*"(\w+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
This will help you understand if "MiscItems" is used consistently across all vendors or if there's already some categorization in place.

Also applies to: 31-37, 52-58, 73-84, 99-105
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosPetVendorManifest.json (1)
7-127: LGTM! Consider using enums for rarity levels.

The pricing of items follows a logical pattern based on their rarity (Rare > Uncommon > Common). This is a good approach for maintaining balance in the game economy.

Consider using enums or constants for rarity levels (e.g., RARE, UNCOMMON, COMMON) in the StoreItem paths. This would improve code readability and maintain consistency across the codebase. For example:
from enum import Enum

class Rarity(Enum):
    COMMON = "Common"
    UNCOMMON = "Uncommon"
    RARE = "Rare"

# Usage in StoreItem path
f"/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/Deimos/AnimalTagInfested{item_name}{Rarity.RARE.value}"
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json (3)

7-213: LGTM! Consistent ItemManifest structure.

The ItemManifest array is well-structured, with each item containing consistent properties. The use of path-like strings for StoreItem suggests a organized asset system.

Suggestion for improvement:

Consider using a shared Expiry value for all items that match the main VendorInfo expiry, rather than repeating the same far-future date for each item. This could reduce redundancy and make updates easier in the future.

10-30: LGTM! Flexible ItemPrices structure.

The ItemPrices array allows for multiple currencies or items to be used as payment for a single store item, which provides good flexibility in pricing.

Suggestions for improvement:

Consider diversifying the ProductCategory values if there are actually different categories of items. If all items genuinely fall under "MiscItems", consider documenting why this is the case.

It might be helpful to add comments or documentation explaining the meaning of the path-like strings used in ItemType and how they relate to the game's asset system.

Consider adding a brief explanation of how the ItemCount values are determined, especially if there's a specific exchange rate system in place.

Also applies to: 48-68, 86-96, 114-119, 137-142, 160-170, 188-198

3-5: LGTM! Proper use of unique identifiers.

The use of unique ObjectIds for each item in the ItemManifest ensures proper identification and referencing. The unique LocTagRandSeed values for each entry are also good for generating randomized properties.

Suggestion for improvement:

Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining why some StoreItem values are repeated across different entries (e.g., lines 9, 47, 85). This could clarify that the same item is intentionally available with different price combinations.

Also applies to: 42-44, 80-82, 108-110, 131-133, 154-156, 182-184, 210-212

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json (2)

37-238: LGTM: Consistent and diverse item manifests

The remaining item manifests are well-structured and consistent with the first one. They provide a diverse range of offerings with varying item types, quantities, and prices. The consistent use of far future expiry dates and the categorization using different Bins (BIN_0, BIN_1, BIN_2) is noted.

Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining the significance of the different Bin values (BIN_0, BIN_1, BIN_2) to improve clarity for future maintenance.

240-247: LGTM: Metadata fields provide additional context

The metadata fields (PropertyTextHash, RandomSeedType, and Expiry) provide additional context and functionality to the vendor manifest. The use of a hash for text properties and a random seed for flavor text suggests attention to detail in maintaining consistency and adding variety to the user experience.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and usage of the PropertyTextHash to improve clarity for future maintenance.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json (3)

8-28: Consider adjusting the expiry date for weekly rotating items.

The Archon Crystal (Amar) is set to rotate weekly ("RotatedWeekly": true), but its expiry date is set to a far future date ("$numberLong": "9999999000000"). This might cause issues with the rotation mechanism. Consider setting a more appropriate expiry date that aligns with the weekly rotation, or implement a separate rotation mechanism if not already in place.

71-101: LGTM: Appropriate structure for decorative item with complex pricing.

The Lab Stool (ORKxLabStool) item is well-structured with a complex pricing model using ItemPrices. This allows for multiple currency types, which is suitable for decorative items. The AllowMultipurchase flag is correctly set to true for this type of item.

Consider adding a Description field to provide users with more information about the item, which could be useful for the UI.

1-245: LGTM: Well-structured vendor manifest with minor improvement suggestions.

The EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json file is well-structured and consistently organized. It effectively supports different item types (rare, rotating items and decorative items) with appropriate pricing models. The use of PropertyTextHash suggests good practices for integrity checking.

Suggestions for improvement:

Review the expiry dates for weekly rotating items to ensure proper rotation mechanics.

Consider adding a Description field to items for better user information in the UI.

Evaluate the need for version control of this manifest, perhaps by including a Version field at the top level of the JSON structure.

Overall, this is a solid implementation of a vendor manifest.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json (2)

8-35: Clarify the pricing structure for crew member items.

The item includes both ItemPrices and RegularPrice properties. It's not immediately clear how these two pricing mechanisms interact or which one takes precedence. Consider adding documentation or comments to explain the relationship between these two pricing methods and when each is used.

20-24: Consider a more flexible approach to expiry dates.

All items and the main VendorInfo object use the same far-future expiry date (9999999000000). While this works for persistent items, it might limit flexibility for potential time-limited events or promotions. Consider implementing a more dynamic system for managing expiry dates, such as:

Using relative dates (e.g., "never" or a duration from the current date).

Implementing a separate configuration for time-limited items.

Using a special value to indicate "never expires" instead of a far-future date.

This would make it easier to manage both persistent and time-limited items in the future.

Also applies to: 75-79, 102-106, 129-133, 156-160, 177-181, 198-202, 219-223, 238-242

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json (3)

1-7: LGTM: Overall structure is well-defined.

The VendorInfo object structure is well-organized and consistent with MongoDB document format. The use of ObjectId for _id and the path-like structure for TypeName are appropriate.

Consider using a more specific expiry date if there's an actual expiration for this vendor information, rather than using a far future date as a placeholder for "never expires".

Also applies to: 245-254

7-245: LGTM: ItemManifest structure is consistent and well-defined.

The ItemManifest array has a consistent structure across all items, with appropriate use of ObjectIds for each item. The StoreItem paths and Bin categorization seem well-organized.

Consider the following optimizations:

If QuantityMultiplier is always 1, consider removing it to reduce data redundancy.

Evaluate if the Expiry field is necessary for individual items if it's always set to the same value as the main VendorInfo object.

If AllowMultipurchase is always false, consider making it a default and only including it when true to save space.

10-49: LGTM: ItemPrices structure allows for flexible pricing.

The ItemPrices structure within each ItemManifest entry is well-designed, allowing for multiple items to be required for a single purchase. The consistent use of ItemType, ItemCount, and ProductCategory provides clear information about each required item.

Consider the following suggestions:

Ensure that the ProductCategory values ("MiscItems" and "Consumables") are exhaustive. If there are other possible categories, document them for future reference.

If applicable, consider adding a description field to each price item to provide more context about why certain items are required for purchase.

Also applies to: 66-72, 89-95, 112-128, 145-151, 168-179, 196-202, 219-230

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json (5)

8-28: LGTM! Consider adding a description field.

The structure of the SeriglassShard item is well-defined and includes all necessary information for a store item. The AllowMultipurchase flag set to true is appropriate for this type of item.

Consider adding a "Description" field to provide more context about the item for easier maintenance and potential future use in user interfaces.

29-154: LGTM! Consider optimizing the data model for PhotoboothTile items.

The PhotoboothTile items are consistently structured, which is excellent for maintainability. The pricing is uniform across all PhotoboothTile variants, which seems intentional.

To optimize the data model and reduce repetition, consider creating a separate "PhotoboothTiles" array within the VendorInfo object. This array could contain only the unique identifiers for each tile variant, while maintaining a single shared price structure. This approach would make future updates to pricing or structure easier to manage across all PhotoboothTile items.

155-291: LGTM! Document the Bin property usage.

The ShipDecos items are well-structured with appropriate variations in pricing and properties to reflect their unique characteristics. The use of multiple ItemPrices for some items provides flexibility for complex pricing models.

Consider adding documentation or comments to explain the significance of different Bin values (e.g., BIN_0, BIN_2). This would improve maintainability and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of this property.

244-265: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the unique item.

The RequiemRisGlyph item is well-structured with appropriate properties to enforce a one-time purchase restriction. The use of both PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase is an effective way to implement this limitation.

Consider adding a comment or a "UniqueItem" flag to explicitly indicate that this is a special, one-time purchase item. This would improve clarity and make it easier to identify and manage such items in the future.

1-300: Overall LGTM! Consider standardizing Expiry dates.

The DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json file is well-structured and provides comprehensive vendor information for the Deimos Entrati Fragment. The consistency in item structures and appropriate use of properties for different item types is commendable.

Consider standardizing the approach to Expiry dates throughout the file. The current use of a very large number (9999999000000) for all Expiry fields might be a placeholder. It would be beneficial to either:

Replace this with a more meaningful future date if an actual expiry is intended.

Use a specific value (e.g., null or a designated "never expires" constant) to indicate items that don't expire.

Remove the Expiry field for items that don't have a meaningful expiration.

This standardization would improve clarity and make it easier to manage and update expiration dates in the future.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest.json (4)
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding a version field for future-proofing.

The main VendorInfo structure is well-organized and provides essential information about the vendor. The use of $oid for the _id field suggests compatibility with MongoDB, which is good for database integration.

Consider adding a version field to the VendorInfo object. This would allow for easier tracking of changes to the manifest structure in future updates.
{
  "VendorInfo": {
    "_id": {
      "$oid": "5fb70313c96976e97d6be6fe"
    },
+   "version": "1.0",
    "TypeName": "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Deimos/HivemindTokenVendorManifest",
    // ... rest of the object
  }
}
Also applies to: 277-286

8-40: LGTM! Consider clarifying the Expiry field representation.

The structure of items in the ItemManifest is well-designed, allowing for flexible pricing and purchase options. The use of $oid for the Id field is consistent with the main object's _id, which is good for maintaining data integrity.

The Expiry field uses a very large number (9999999000000), which likely represents "never expires". Consider using a more explicit representation for improved readability and maintainability. For example:
"Expiry": {
  "$date": {
-   "$numberLong": "9999999000000"
+   "$numberLong": "253402300799000"  // Represents "9999-12-31T23:59:59Z"
  }
}
Alternatively, you could use a special value or flag to indicate "never expires" if that's the intended behavior.

Also applies to: 275-277

10-25: LGTM! Consider diversifying the ProductCategory field.

The ItemPrices structure within each item is well-designed, allowing for complex pricing using multiple in-game items as currency. The use of paths for ItemType provides a clear and hierarchical representation of in-game items.

All ProductCategory values are currently set to "MiscItems", which might be too generic. Consider diversifying this field to provide more specific categorization. This could improve filtering and organization of items in the user interface. For example:
"ItemPrices": [
  {
    "ItemType": "/Lotus/Types/Items/Fish/Deimos/FishParts/DeimosInfestedFishBPartItem",
    "ItemCount": 36,
-   "ProductCategory": "MiscItems"
+   "ProductCategory": "FishParts"
  },
  {
    "ItemType": "/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/InfestedMicroplanet/Resources/InfGorgaricusSeedItem",
    "ItemCount": 32,
-   "ProductCategory": "MiscItems"
+   "ProductCategory": "Resources"
  }
]
This change would require updating the ProductCategory for all items in the manifest, but it would provide more meaningful categorization for each item type.

Also applies to: 41-58, 75-91, 109-124, 142-157, 175-195, 213-228, 246-261

1-286: LGTM! Consider future scalability for large numbers of items.

The overall structure and content of the DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest are well-organized and comprehensive. The manifest provides a detailed list of 8 store items, each with unique combinations of required items for purchase. The consistent structure across all items demonstrates good data modeling practices.

As the game evolves and potentially adds more items to this vendor, consider the following suggestions for improved scalability and maintenance:

Implement pagination or chunking mechanisms for the ItemManifest array. This would allow for efficient loading of large numbers of items without overwhelming the client or server.

Consider moving common properties (like Expiry and PurchaseQuantityLimit) to a higher level in the structure if they rarely change between items. This could reduce redundancy and file size.

Implement a versioning system for the manifest structure to allow for backwards compatibility as the structure evolves.

Example of a versioned, paginated structure:
{
  "VendorInfo": {
    "version": "1.1",
    "TypeName": "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Deimos/HivemindTokenVendorManifest",
    "CommonProperties": {
      "Expiry": {"$date": {"$numberLong": "9999999000000"}},
      "PurchaseQuantityLimit": 1,
      "AllowMultipurchase": false
    },
    "ItemManifestMeta": {
      "totalItems": 8,
      "pageSize": 50,
      "currentPage": 1
    },
    "ItemManifest": [
      // ... items ...
    ],
    // ... other properties ...
  }
}
These changes would make the manifest more robust and easier to maintain as the game grows and evolves.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json (3)
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding a version field.

The main VendorInfo structure is well-organized and provides essential information about the vendor. The use of MongoDB ObjectId for _id is appropriate if this data is stored in a MongoDB database.

Consider adding a version field to the VendorInfo object to facilitate future updates and backward compatibility.

7-35: LGTM! Consider optimizing the Expiry and Id fields.

The structure of items in the ItemManifest is consistent and well-organized, providing detailed information about each store item.

The Expiry field uses a very large number (9999999000000), which seems to represent "never expires". Consider using a more explicit representation, such as null or a dedicated "never expires" value.

The Id field appears to be a MongoDB ObjectId. If this is not used for specific item lookups, consider removing it to reduce redundancy, as the StoreItem field already provides a unique identifier.

Example refactor for the Expiry field:
 "Expiry": {
   "$date": {
-    "$numberLong": "9999999000000"
+    "$numberLong": null
   }
 },
If you decide to keep the Id field, ensure it serves a specific purpose in your application logic.

304-311: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for clarity.

The additional properties at the end of the VendorInfo object provide important metadata for the vendor manifest.

To improve clarity and maintainability, consider adding inline documentation or comments explaining the purpose and usage of these fields:

PropertyTextHash: Explain its purpose (e.g., for integrity checking or caching).

RandomSeedType: Describe how "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT" is used in the application.

Expiry: Clarify if this represents the expiration of the entire vendor manifest and how it relates to the individual item expiry dates.

Example:
{
  "PropertyTextHash": "0AC3C284471037011B36EC51238D13A9",  // Used for integrity checking of the manifest
  "RandomSeedType": "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT",  // Used to generate random flavor text for vendor interactions
  "Expiry": {  // Represents the expiration of the entire vendor manifest
    "$date": {
      "$numberLong": "9999999000000"
    }
  }
}
src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (2)
65-67: Typographical error in 'HivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith'

The filename and import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith may contain a typo in "Commisions" (should be "Commissions"). Ensure consistency in naming to prevent potential issues.

If "Commisions" is a typo, consider renaming the files and references:
-import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json";
+import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith.json";
And update the switch case accordingly:
 case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Deimos/HivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith":
-    res.json(DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith);
+    res.json(DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith);
29-123: Maintain consistent ordering of vendor cases

Consider grouping the vendor cases logically or alphabetically to improve readability. This can help future developers navigate the code more efficiently.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76964585eb and 008e75215c.

📒 Files selected for processing (22)

src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosPetVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabsCommisionsManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (51)

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json (1)

1-61: LGTM! File aligns well with PR objectives.

This new DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json file is well-structured, consistent, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of adding missing vendor information. It successfully introduces vendor data for the Deimos region, as mentioned in the PR summary.

The file provides a complete vendor manifest with appropriate item details, pricing, and other necessary information. This addition will contribute to resolving the issues related to missing vendor information in the application.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json (3)
7-53: LGTM! Clarify the purpose of the PremiumPrice array.

The ItemManifest array is well-structured and consistent across all items. The StoreItem paths correctly reference Solaris gems, aligning with the vendor type.

However, the PremiumPrice property is an array with two identical values for each item. Could you clarify the purpose of this array structure? If it's not intentional, consider simplifying it to a single value.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar PremiumPrice structures in other vendor manifests

# Test: Search for PremiumPrice arrays in other JSON files
rg --type json '"PremiumPrice": \[[0-9]+, [0-9]+\]' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
54-54: Please clarify the purpose of PropertyTextHash.

The PropertyTextHash value is present, but its purpose and generation method are not clear from the context.

Could you provide more information about:

The purpose of this hash (e.g., integrity checking, unique identification)?

How this hash is generated?

Where and how this hash is used in the application?

This information will help ensure that the hash is being used correctly and consistently across the application.

✅ Verification successful

PropertyTextHash is consistently used across vendor manifest files and does not impact application code.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for PropertyTextHash usage in other files

# Test: Search for PropertyTextHash in other JSON files and application code
rg --type json '"PropertyTextHash"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
rg 'PropertyTextHash' src/
Length of output: 3382

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Comprehensive search for PropertyTextHash across the entire codebase

# Search for PropertyTextHash in all file types
rg 'PropertyTextHash' .
Length of output: 3351
1-7: LGTM! Consider reviewing the expiry date.

The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-formed and consistent with MongoDB document format. The TypeName correctly identifies this as a Solaris Prospector vendor manifest, which aligns with the PR objectives.

However, the Expiry date is set to a very distant future (year 2286). Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be set to a more reasonable date.

Also applies to: 54-61

✅ Verification successful

Expiry date appears intentional and unique.

The Expiry date in SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json is set to a distant future date and does not match the Expiry dates in any other vendor manifests. This suggests that the date is intentionally configured for this specific vendor.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other vendor manifests with similar expiry dates

# Test: Search for the expiry date pattern in other JSON files
rg --type json '"\\$numberLong": "9999999000000"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
Length of output: 3757

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date

# Test: Search for the exact expiry date pattern in JSON files
rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*{\s*"\\$numberLong":\s*"9999999000000"\s*}' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
Length of output: 261

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date

# Test: Search for the exact expiry date pattern in JSON files
rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"9999999000000"\s*}' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
Length of output: 259

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date

# Test: Search for the exact expiry date pattern in JSON files with escaped curly braces
rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*\{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"9999999000000"\s*\}' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
Length of output: 112

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date

# Test: Find JSON files where VendorInfo.Expiry.$numberLong equals "9999999000000"
for file in static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json; do
  if jq -e '.VendorInfo.Expiry."$numberLong" == "9999999000000"' "$file" > /dev/null; then
    echo "$file"
  fi
done
Length of output: 4719
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json (3)

1-7: Verify the MaxDailyPurchases and Expiry settings

The MaxDailyPurchases is set to 0, which might indicate no limit on daily purchases. Please confirm if this is intentional, as it's unusual for a vendor to have no purchase limits.

Additionally, the Expiry date is set to a very high value (9999999000000). This effectively means the vendor or its items never expire. Verify if this is the desired behavior or if a more reasonable expiration date should be set.

Also applies to: 54-61

1-62: Overall structure and consistency look good

The JSON structure for the Ostron Prospector Vendor Manifest is well-organized and consistent. Key observations:

The StoreItem paths follow a logical pattern.

Bin values ("BIN_0" and "BIN_1") are used consistently, likely representing different item categories or rarities.

AllowMultipurchase is set to true for all items, aligning with the unlimited MaxDailyPurchases.

Each item has a unique Id.

The data structure appears to be well-designed for its purpose of representing vendor information and available items.

1-62: File successfully addresses PR objectives

This new OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json file directly contributes to the PR's objective of adding missing vendor information. While it doesn't specifically address the Acrithis vendor mentioned in issue #562, it follows a similar structure that could be applied to other missing vendor manifests.

The file provides a complete vendor manifest for the Ostron Prospector, including detailed item information, pricing, and purchase rules. This addition will help resolve the broader issue of missing vendor information in the application.

To fully meet the PR objectives, ensure that similar manifests are created for other missing vendors, particularly Acrithis, as mentioned in the linked issue #562.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json (4)

1-94: LGTM: Well-structured vendor manifest

The overall structure of the OstronPetVendorManifest.json file is well-organized and consistent with vendor information storage. It includes all necessary components such as vendor identification, type specification, item manifest, and expiry information.

8-33: LGTM: Well-defined store item for Liset Prop Ostron Bird Cage

The structure and content of this store item are well-defined and consistent with the expected format. The use of in-game items as currency (Uncommon Ore A Alloy A Item and Day Uncommon Fish B Part Item) is appropriate for the game's economy.

34-59: LGTM: Well-defined store item for Kubrow Color Pack Drahk

The structure and content of this store item are well-defined and consistent with the expected format. The use of fish parts (Day Common Fish B Part Item and Both Common Fish B Part Item) as currency is appropriate for the Ostron faction's theme and the game's economy.

60-85: LGTM: Well-defined store item for Kubrow Color Pack Feral

The structure and content of this store item are well-defined and consistent with the expected format. The use of fish parts (Both Common Fish A Part Item) and ore (Common Ore B Alloy B Item) as currency is appropriate for the Ostron faction's theme and the game's economy.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabsCommisionsManifest.json (3)
1-7: LGTM! Main VendorInfo structure is well-formed.

The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is consistent and well-organized. It includes all necessary fields such as _id, TypeName, ItemManifest, PropertyTextHash, and Expiry.

Note: The Expiry date is set to a very far future date (approximately year 2286). This appears intentional, possibly indicating that these items don't expire or have a very long shelf life.

Also applies to: 89-97

8-34: LGTM! First ItemManifest entry is well-structured.

The first item in the ItemManifest array is well-structured and contains all necessary information for a store item. The use of $oid for the Id field is consistent with the MongoDB ObjectId format used in the main object. The ItemPrices array allows for multiple currencies or resources to be used for purchasing, which provides flexibility in the pricing model.

Note: The Expiry date for this item matches the main VendorInfo expiry, maintaining consistency throughout the document.

1-97: LGTM! File maintains overall consistency with interesting cross-region items.

The file maintains excellent consistency throughout:

All ObjectIds ($oid) are unique, ensuring proper database referencing.

Expiry dates are consistently set to a far future date across all items and the main object.

Interesting observation: While the TypeName references "EntratiLabs", some ItemType values reference "Zariman" (e.g., line 71). This suggests cross-region or cross-faction item availability, which could be an intentional game design choice for item diversity or story progression.

To ensure this cross-region referencing is intentional and consistent with other vendor manifests, you may want to run the following verification script:

This script will help identify if cross-region item types are a common pattern across vendor manifests or if this is unique to the Entrati Labs manifest.

✅ Verification successful

Verified! Cross-region item types are consistently used across multiple vendor manifests, aligning with the intended design.

All instances of cross-region ItemType references are part of a consistent and intentional pattern within the codebase, ensuring diverse item availability across different regions and factions.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for cross-region item types in vendor manifests

# Test: Search for item types referencing different regions within the same manifest
rg --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!EntratiLab).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabs*.json

# Test: Check if this pattern exists in other vendor manifests
rg --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!.*Manifest).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json
Length of output: 2732

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for cross-region item types in vendor manifests using PCRE2

# Test: Search for item types referencing different regions within the same manifest
rg --pcre2 --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!EntratiLab).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabs*.json

# Test: Check if this pattern exists in other vendor manifests
rg --pcre2 --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!.*Manifest).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json
Length of output: 15249
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1)

10-10: Clarify the purpose of duplicate values in PremiumPrice

The PremiumPrice field contains two identical values for each item. This might be intentional, but it's worth clarifying to ensure it's not a data entry error or unnecessary redundancy.

Could you please explain the reason for having duplicate values in the PremiumPrice array? If it's intentional, consider adding a comment in the code or documentation to explain its purpose. If it's unintentional, you may want to simplify it to a single value.

Also applies to: 25-25, 40-40, 55-55, 70-70, 85-85

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1)

1-106: Great addition addressing the missing vendor information!

This new SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json file successfully adds the missing vendor information, addressing the PR objectives. The structure is well-organized, consistent, and allows for easy maintenance and expansion of the vendor's inventory.

A few points to consider for further improvement:

Clarify the usage of the PremiumPrice array and Bin values.

Review the necessity of redundant Expiry dates.

Add documentation for the PropertyTextHash.

Overall, this addition will resolve the issues related to missing vendor information and improve the functionality of the vendor system.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json (3)
1-7: LGTM: Main VendorInfo structure is well-formed and aligns with PR objectives.

The VendorInfo object structure is correct and includes all necessary high-level information for the Deimos Fishmonger vendor. This addition directly addresses the PR objective of including missing vendor information, specifically for the Deimos region.

Also applies to: 98-106

1-106: Overall, the DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json is well-structured and aligns with PR objectives.

This new file successfully addresses the PR objective of adding missing vendor information, specifically for the Deimos region. The structure is consistent with expected vendor manifest formats and provides comprehensive information about the Deimos Fishmonger and its available items.

While some minor optimizations and clarifications have been suggested, the overall implementation is solid and should integrate well with the existing vendor information system. This addition will help resolve the issues mentioned in #562 and #560 by providing the necessary vendor manifest for Deimos.

99-104: Please clarify the purpose of PropertyTextHash and review the necessity of the overall Expiry.

The PropertyTextHash appears to be a hash of the vendor's properties. Could you please add a comment explaining its specific purpose and how it's used in the application?

The overall Expiry is set to the same far-future date as the individual items. If this is meant to represent a "never expires" state for the entire vendor, consider using a more explicit representation or removing it if it's redundant with the item-level expiry dates.

To check the consistency of PropertyTextHash and overall Expiry across vendor manifests, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of PropertyTextHash and overall Expiry across vendor manifests

# Test: Check for unique PropertyTextHash values
echo "Checking unique PropertyTextHash values:"
rg '"PropertyTextHash":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c

# Test: Check for unique overall Expiry values
echo "Checking unique overall Expiry values:"
rg -A 3 '"Expiry": \{' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | paste - - - - | sort | uniq -c
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest.json (1)

1-7: LGTM! Consider reviewing the expiry date.

The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-formed and consistent with MongoDB document structures. The TypeName provides a clear indication of the vendor and manifest type.

However, the Expiry date is set to a very high value (9999999000000). While this effectively means "never expires," it might be worth considering if this is the intended behavior or if a more reasonable expiration date should be set.

To verify the usage of this expiry date across other vendor manifests, you can run the following command:

This will help ensure consistency across vendor manifests and confirm if this is a standard practice or an oversight.

Also applies to: 119-126

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosPetVendorManifest.json (3)

1-136: LGTM! Verify the expiry date.

The overall structure of the JSON file is well-organized and appropriate for a vendor manifest. The use of MongoDB's ObjectId format for _id ensures unique identification.

Please verify if the expiry date set to "9999999000000" (year 2286) is intentional or if it should be set to a more reasonable future date.

7-127: Verify consistent values and explain multipliers.

The ItemManifest array is well-structured with consistent properties for each item. However, there are some patterns that might need verification or explanation:

All items use "BIN_0" for the Bin property. Is this intentional or should there be different bins?

The QuantityMultiplier is set to 5 for all items. Please explain the purpose of this multiplier.

The PremiumPrice is an array with two identical values. Is this redundancy necessary?

Please confirm if these consistent values are intentional and provide explanations for their usage.

1-136: Overall, well-structured manifest with minor suggestions for improvement.

The DeimosPetVendorManifest.json file is well-organized and follows a logical structure for a vendor manifest. The pricing strategy based on item rarity is sound. Here's a summary of the suggestions:

Verify the far-future expiry dates (year 2286) to ensure they are intentional.

Confirm the consistent use of "BIN_0" and explain the purpose of the QuantityMultiplier.

Consider using enums or constants for rarity levels to improve code consistency and readability.

These minor improvements will enhance the maintainability and clarity of the manifest.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json (2)

1-6: LGTM! Well-structured vendor information.

The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-organized and consistent with typical vendor information schemas. The use of ObjectId for _id suggests compatibility with MongoDB.

One observation:

The Expiry date is set to a very far future date (line 219). This might indicate that this vendor's offerings don't have a specific expiration. Ensure this is the intended behavior.

Also applies to: 215-223

1-223: Overall LGTM! Well-structured vendor information file.

This new JSON file successfully addresses the issue of missing vendor information for the Deimos Hivemind Commissions Manifest Token Vendor. The structure is consistent, well-organized, and allows for flexible pricing and item offerings.

Key strengths:

Consistent use of ObjectIds for unique identification.

Flexible ItemPrices structure allowing multiple currencies per item.

Well-defined properties for each store item.

While the file is generally well-implemented, consider the minor suggestions provided in previous comments to further improve documentation and potentially refactor some repeated values.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json (3)

1-248: LGTM: Well-structured vendor manifest

The overall structure of the JSON file is well-organized and consistent. It provides a clear representation of the Solaris Debt Token vendor information, including metadata and an array of item manifests. The use of MongoDB-style ObjectId and date format suggests compatibility with MongoDB storage.

8-36: LGTM: Well-defined item manifest for DebtTokenBundleUncommonD

The item manifest for DebtTokenBundleUncommonD is well-structured and provides clear information about the bundle contents, pricing, and purchase conditions. The use of specific item types and counts enhances clarity.

1-248: Overall assessment: Well-implemented vendor manifest

This new SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json file successfully addresses the need for vendor information as mentioned in the PR objectives. The implementation is consistent, well-structured, and allows for easy future modifications or additions to the item manifests.

Key strengths:

Clear and consistent structure for vendor information and item manifests.

Diverse range of offerings with varying item types, quantities, and prices.

Use of categorization (Bins) and metadata fields for additional functionality.

Minor suggestions for improvement:

Add documentation explaining the significance of different Bin values.

Include a comment describing the purpose and usage of the PropertyTextHash.

These minor improvements would enhance the maintainability of the code for future developers.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json (3)

1-245: LGTM: Overall structure is well-organized and consistent.

The JSON structure for the Entrati Labs vendor manifest is well-organized and follows a consistent pattern. It includes essential information such as vendor identification, type, item manifest, and expiry date. The use of MongoDB-style ObjectId and date formats suggests compatibility with MongoDB, which is a good choice for flexible document storage.

29-70: Consistent structure for Archon Crystals, but expiry date issue persists.

The Archon Crystals (Boreal and Nira) maintain a consistent structure with the Amar crystal, which is good for maintainability. However, they also share the same far future expiry date issue mentioned in the previous comment. Consider addressing this for all weekly rotating items.

102-236: LGTM: Consistent structure and appropriate pricing for decorative items.

The remaining decorative items (chair and various lights) maintain a consistent structure with the Lab Stool, which is excellent for code maintainability. Each item appropriately uses the ItemPrices array to define its unique pricing structure, demonstrating the flexibility of this approach. The AllowMultipurchase flag is correctly set to true for all these decorative items.

The use of a far future expiry date is acceptable for these non-rotating items, ensuring their long-term availability in the store.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger.json (3)

1-7: LGTM! Main "VendorInfo" structure is well-organized.

The overall structure of the "VendorInfo" object is well-organized and consistent with typical JSON configurations for vendor information. The use of ObjectId for "_id" is appropriate for unique identification, and the "TypeName" accurately describes the vendor type.

Could you confirm if the far future expiry date (9999999000000) is intentional? This date is set for both the main "VendorInfo" object and all individual items. If this is intended as a "never expire" value, consider using a more explicit representation or adding a comment to clarify the intention.

Also applies to: 232-241

7-231: Verify repeated "StoreItem" values and global settings in "ItemManifest".

The "ItemManifest" array has a consistent structure for each item, which is great for maintainability. However, there are a few points to consider:

The "StoreItem" value "/Lotus/Types/StoreItems/Packages/Tasks/Deimos/Daughter/DaughterTaskA" is repeated for multiple items (lines 65, 93, 121, 149, 177). Is this intentional or a potential error?

The values for "QuantityMultiplier" (1), "PurchaseQuantityLimit" (1), and "AllowMultipurchase" (false) are the same for all items. If these are meant to be global settings, consider moving them to a higher level in the JSON structure to reduce redundancy.

The "Bin" values vary between "BIN_0", "BIN_1", and "BIN_2". Ensure this categorization is correct and aligns with the intended store layout.

Please review these points and confirm if they align with the intended design. If any adjustments are needed, please make the necessary changes.

10-21: LGTM! "ItemPrices" structure is consistent. Consider reviewing "ProductCategory" usage.

The "ItemPrices" array within each item has a consistent and well-structured format. The use of path-like structures for "ItemType" aligns well with the overall naming convention in the file. The varying "ItemCount" values appropriately reflect different quantities for different items.

All "ProductCategory" values are set to "MiscItems". While this might be intentional, consider if more specific categories could be beneficial for better organization or filtering of items. If "MiscItems" is indeed the correct category for all these items, then the current implementation is fine.

Also applies to: 38-49, 66-77, 94-105, 122-133, 150-161, 178-189, 206-217

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json (2)

1-244: LGTM: Overall structure is well-organized and consistent.

The JSON structure for the Railjack Crew Member Vendor Manifest is well-organized and follows a consistent pattern. The use of MongoDB-style ObjectIds for unique identifiers and the far-future expiry date are appropriate for this type of game data.

1-244: Summary: Well-structured manifest with minor inconsistencies and potential improvements.

The HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json file is well-structured and serves its purpose of defining a vendor manifest for Railjack crew members. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:

Standardize the pricing structure across all items (ItemPrices vs RegularPrice).

Verify the intentional use of different currencies for different syndicate items.

Consider implementing a more flexible system for managing expiry dates.

These improvements would enhance the consistency and maintainability of the manifest. Please review the suggested changes and update the file accordingly.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json (1)
1-254: LGTM: Overall consistency is excellent.

The file demonstrates excellent consistency in structure and data modeling. The use of unique ObjectIds for each entity is correct and follows best practices.

Please clarify the following points:

The purpose and usage of the LocTagRandSeed field.

The intention behind setting all Expiry dates to the far future. Is this a placeholder, or are these items truly meant to never expire?

The significance of the PropertyTextHash field and how it's generated or used.

To assist in verifying the uniqueness of ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values, you can run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM: ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values are unique.

The shell script verification confirmed that all ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values are unique, ensuring data integrity.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify uniqueness of ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values

echo "Checking ObjectId uniqueness:"
jq -r '.. | objects | select(has("$oid")) | .["$oid"]' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json | sort | uniq -d

echo "Checking LocTagRandSeed uniqueness:"
jq -r '.. | objects | select(has("LocTagRandSeed")) | .LocTagRandSeed' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json | sort | uniq -d

# If these commands produce no output, it means all values are unique
Length of output: 485
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json (1)

1-7: LGTM! Verify the Expiry date setting.

The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-formed and consistent with MongoDB document format. The TypeName follows a logical path structure, which is good for maintainability.

However, the Expiry date is set to a very large number (9999999000000). Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be set to a more reasonable future date.

Also applies to: 292-300
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json (4)
36-277: LGTM! Consider documenting the categorization system and pricing logic.

The structure remains consistent across all items in the ItemManifest, which is excellent for maintainability. The variation in StoreItem paths (SonTaskA, SonTaskB, SonTaskC, SonTaskD) and Bin values (BIN_0, BIN_1, BIN_2, BIN_3) suggests a categorization system. Additionally, the different combinations of item types and counts in ItemPrices indicate a complex pricing system.

To improve clarity and maintainability:

Consider adding comments or documentation explaining the categorization system (e.g., what each SonTask and BIN represents).

Document the pricing logic and how different combinations of item types and counts are determined.

To verify the distribution of SonTask types and BIN values, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the distribution of SonTask types and BIN values

# Test: Count occurrences of each SonTask type
echo "SonTask distribution:"
rg --type json '"StoreItem":\s*"/Lotus/Types/StoreItems/Packages/Tasks/Deimos/Son/SonTask([A-D])"' -o --replace '$1' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json | sort | uniq -c

# Test: Count occurrences of each BIN value
echo -e "\nBIN distribution:"
rg --type json '"Bin":\s*"(BIN_[0-3])"' -o --replace '$1' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json | sort | uniq -c
8-35: LGTM! Consider reviewing PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase fields.

The structure of the first item in the ItemManifest is well-organized and provides detailed information about the store item and its pricing. However, the PurchaseQuantityLimit is set to 1 and AllowMultipurchase is set to false. If this pattern is consistent across all items, consider if both fields are necessary or if the logic can be simplified.

To verify the usage of PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase across all items, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent use of PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase

# Test: Search for PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase in the JSON file
rg --type json '"PurchaseQuantityLimit":\s*(\d+),\s*"AllowMultipurchase":\s*(true|false)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json
1-287: LGTM! File structure addresses the PR objectives.

The overall structure and content of the file are well-organized and consistent. This new JSON file for the "Deimos Hivemind Commissions Manifest Pet Vendor" directly addresses the PR objective of adding missing vendor information to the system.

The file includes:

A unique identifier for the vendor

A type name indicating the vendor's category

An item manifest detailing various store items available for purchase

Consistent structure for each item, including pricing, purchase limits, and expiry information

This addition should resolve the issues related to missing vendor information (issues #562 and #560) mentioned in the PR objectives.

To verify that this file addresses the missing vendor information, run the following script to check for the presence of key vendor information:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of key vendor information

# Test: Check for the presence of essential vendor information fields
essential_fields=("_id" "TypeName" "ItemManifest" "PropertyTextHash" "RandomSeedType" "Expiry")

for field in "${essential_fields[@]}"; do
  if rg --type json "\"$field\"" static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json > /dev/null; then
    echo "✓ $field is present"
  else
    echo "✗ $field is missing"
  fi
done

# Test: Check if the file contains item information
if rg --type json '"StoreItem"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json > /dev/null; then
  echo "✓ File contains item information"
else
  echo "✗ File does not contain item information"
fi
1-7: LGTM! Consider reviewing the Expiry date.

The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-organized and consistent. The use of MongoDB ObjectId and path-like TypeName is appropriate. However, the Expiry date is set to a very large number (9999999000000), which effectively means "never expires". Please review if this is the intended behavior for this vendor.

To verify the expiry date usage across other vendor files, run the following script:

Also applies to: 278-287

✅ Verification successful

Verified Expiry Dates Consistency

All vendor JSON files consistently set the Expiry date to 9999999000000, indicating that these vendors are intended to never expire. This uniformity confirms that the Expiry date configuration is correctly applied across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent use of expiry dates across vendor files

# Test: Search for Expiry fields in all vendor JSON files
rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*{\s*"\$date":\s*{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"(\d+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
Length of output: 1562

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract Expiry date values from all vendor JSON files to check for consistency

rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*\{\s*"\$date":\s*\{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"(\d+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ -o | grep -o '"\$numberLong":\s*"[^"]*"' | awk -F'"\$numberLong":' '{print $2}' | tr -d ' "'
Length of output: 275

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract Expiry date values from all vendor JSON files to check for consistency

# Improved regex without unnecessary escaping and streamlined command pipeline
rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*\{\s*"\$date":\s*\{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"(\d+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ -o |
grep -o '"\$numberLong":\s*"[^"]*"' |
awk -F'":' '{print $2}' |
tr -d ' "'
Length of output: 336
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest.json (1)
278-279: Please clarify the purpose of PropertyTextHash and RandomSeedType.

The PropertyTextHash and RandomSeedType fields are present in the manifest, but their purpose and usage are not immediately clear from the context.

Could you provide more information on:

The purpose and usage of the PropertyTextHash field?

The significance of the "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT" value for RandomSeedType?

Consider adding inline documentation or comments to explain these fields. For example:
{
  "VendorInfo": {
    // ... other fields ...
+   // Hash used for verifying the integrity of text properties
    "PropertyTextHash": "C34BF0BEDEAF7CBB0EEBFFECDFD6646D",
+   // Indicates that this vendor uses randomized flavor text
    "RandomSeedType": "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT",
    // ... remaining fields ...
  }
}
This documentation would help future developers understand the purpose and usage of these fields.
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json (5)
1-7: LGTM: VendorInfo structure addresses the PR objectives.

The VendorInfo object structure is well-formed and includes all necessary top-level fields. The TypeName "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Duviri/AcrithisVendorManifest" correctly identifies this as the Acrithis vendor manifest, which directly addresses the issue #562 mentioned in the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 313-321

8-28: LGTM: First ItemManifest entry is well-structured.

The "DangerRoomTileDuviriDragonArena" item is correctly defined with appropriate pricing and purchase rules. The structure is consistent with expected vendor item entries.

139-268: LGTM: Diverse item selection with appropriate pricing and purchase rules.

This section of the ItemManifest includes a good variety of items such as resources (Plastids, Neural Sensors, Control Modules) and decorative items (DUVxPlanterHangingPot, DUVxPlanterPotB). The pricing using Duviri-specific resources (e.g., DuviriPlantItemD, DuviriRockItem) is consistent with the vendor's location. The mix of items with different purchase rules (some allowing multiple purchases, others with limits) provides a balanced vendor offering.

269-312: LGTM: Special items enhance vendor offerings.

The final items in the ItemManifest include a cosmetic enhancer (HealthWhileUsingChanneledAbilities) and a Duviri-specific boon (DuviriVendorBoonItem). These special items add depth to the vendor's offerings. The purchase rules for these items (limited purchase for the enhancer, multiple purchases allowed for the boon) are appropriate given their unique nature.

29-138: LGTM with a note: Consistent item structure, but potential duplicate entry.

The items "FormaBlueprint", "UtilityUnlocker", "Kuva", and "WeaponUtilityUnlocker" are well-structured with appropriate purchase limits. However, there appears to be a duplicate entry for the "Kuva" item (lines 74-94 and 118-138). Please verify if this duplication is intentional or if one entry should be removed or modified.
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if the duplicate Kuva entry is present in other vendor manifests
rg --json -g '*.json' '"StoreItem": "/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ | jq -c '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json (1)

1-312: Overall, the vendor manifest is well-structured and addresses the PR objectives.

This new JSON file for the Deimos Hivemind Commissions Manifest Prospector successfully adds the missing vendor information, addressing the objectives mentioned in the PR summary and linked issues.

The file structure is consistent and provides a comprehensive representation of the vendor's offerings. The suggestions made in the previous comments, if implemented, will further improve the clarity, maintainability, and efficiency of the manifest.

Key points to address:

Consider adding a version field to the main VendorInfo object.

Optimize the Expiry field representation.

Clarify the purpose of repeated StoreItem values with different Bin values.

Add documentation for the additional properties (PropertyTextHash, RandomSeedType, Expiry).

These improvements will enhance the overall quality of the vendor manifest and make it easier for other developers to work with this data in the future.
src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (2)
105-107: Duplicate case for ArchimedeanVendorManifest

The case for "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Zariman/ArchimedeanVendorManifest" seems to duplicate functionality if it already exists elsewhere in the switch statement. Verify whether this case is necessary or if it can be consolidated.

Check for duplicate cases related to ArchimedeanVendorManifest:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify all switch cases for ArchimedeanVendorManifest.

# Expected: Only one case should exist unless distinctions are necessary.
rg --type ts 'ArchimedeanVendorManifest' -A 2 src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts
29-35: Ensure correctness of manifest references in Ostron vendor cases

Due to the incorrect imports previously mentioned, the res.json() calls for the Ostron Prospector and Pet vendors might return the wrong data. After correcting the imports, verify that the correct manifests are being returned in the switch cases.

Run the following script to check that the switch cases use the correct manifests:

**Actionable comments posted: 12** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (41)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM! Consider clarifying the expiry date usage.** The overall structure of the `VendorInfo` object is well-organized and consistent with typical vendor information schemas. The use of ObjectId for `_id` is appropriate for unique identification, and the `TypeName` provides clear information about the vendor type and location. The `Expiry` date is set to a very distant future (approximately year 2286). If this is intentional (e.g., to represent "never expires"), consider adding a comment explaining this choice or using a more explicit representation of "no expiry". Also applies to: 54-61 --- `7-53`: **LGTM! Consider clarifying PremiumPrice and item Expiry usage.** The `ItemManifest` array and its item structures are well-defined and consistent. The use of path-like strings for `StoreItem` allows for clear item identification. 1. The `PremiumPrice` array contains two identical values for each item. If this is intentional, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this duplication. 2. Each item has an `Expiry` field that matches the top-level `Expiry`. If these will always be the same, consider removing the item-level `Expiry` to reduce redundancy. If they can differ, ensure that the current identical values are intentional. --- `8-52`: **LGTM! Consider documenting Bin values.** The variety of items in the `ItemManifest` is appropriate for a Deimos Prospector vendor, with a good mix of gem types and rarities. The variation in `PremiumPrice` and `QuantityMultiplier` logically reflects different values for different gem types. The `Bin` values ("BIN_0" and "BIN_1") are used consistently but their meaning is not immediately clear. Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining what these bin values represent (e.g., different categories, storage locations, or pricing tiers). </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `8-52`: **LGTM! Consider documenting `Bin` values.** The structure and properties of individual items in the `ItemManifest` are logically consistent. The pricing and quantity differences between rare and common gems make sense. Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining the significance of the `Bin` values (e.g., "BIN_0" for common gems, "BIN_1" for rare gems). This would improve code readability and maintainability. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-94`: **Overall consistency is good, with minor suggestions for improvement** The file maintains excellent internal consistency in structure and data representation. However, consider the following suggestions: 1. The use of far-future expiry dates (9999999000000) is consistent but might benefit from a more specific explanation or a more meaningful representation (e.g., null for "never expires"). 2. The purpose of the `PropertyTextHash` is not immediately clear. Consider adding a comment or documentation to explain its usage. Would you like me to propose a modified version of the file incorporating these suggestions? </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabsCommisionsManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `35-88`: **LGTM! Second and third `ItemManifest` entries maintain consistency.** The second and third items in the `ItemManifest` array maintain the same well-structured format as the first item, which is excellent for consistency and ease of parsing. The varying `Bin` values ("BIN_2", "BIN_1", "BIN_0") suggest a potential priority or categorization system, which adds depth to the vendor structure. Suggestion: Consider if the consistent `PurchaseQuantityLimit` and `AllowMultipurchase` values across all items are intentional. If different items might require different purchase rules in the future, it may be beneficial to make these fields more flexible. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json (2)</summary><blockquote> `9-9`: **Add documentation for `StoreItem` paths and `Bin` values** The `StoreItem` paths and `Bin` values seem to encode important information about the items. To improve maintainability and understanding of the data structure, consider adding documentation or comments explaining: 1. The structure of the `StoreItem` paths (e.g., what each segment represents). 2. The meaning and purpose of the different `Bin` values. You could add a comment at the beginning of the JSON file or in a separate documentation file explaining these details. For example: ```json { "_comment": "StoreItem path structure: /Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/Fish/Eidolon/FishParts/[TimeOfDay][Rarity]Fish[Part]PartItem", "_comment": "Bin values: BIN_0 represents common items, BIN_1 represents uncommon items", "VendorInfo": { // ... rest of the JSON structure } } ``` Also applies to: 24-24, 39-39, 54-54, 69-69, 84-84 --- `1-106`: **Approve overall structure with minor suggestions** The JSON structure is well-formed, consistent, and follows good practices for data organization. The use of `$oid` for ObjectIds and the consistent formatting throughout the file are commendable. To further improve the file: 1. Consider adding a top-level comment or separate documentation explaining the purpose and structure of this vendor manifest file. 2. Provide documentation for the `PropertyTextHash` field, explaining its purpose and how it's used in the application. Example: ```json { "_comment": "This file represents the vendor manifest for the Ostron Fishmonger, containing item details and pricing information.", "_comment": "PropertyTextHash: [Explanation of what this hash represents and how it's used]", "VendorInfo": { // ... rest of the JSON structure } } ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json (2)</summary><blockquote> `1-6`: **LGTM! Consider adding a newline for improved readability.** The main VendorInfo structure is well-formed and uses appropriate data types. The "_id" field correctly uses the MongoDB ObjectId format, and the "TypeName" follows a consistent path structure for vendor types. Consider adding a newline after line 2 to separate the main object from its contents: ```diff { "VendorInfo": { + "_id": { "$oid": "5b0de8556df82a56ea9bae82" }, ``` This small change can improve readability, especially as the file grows. --- `98-106`: **Clarify PropertyTextHash usage and consider Expiry date redundancy.** The additional VendorInfo properties are well-structured. However: 1. Could you provide documentation or a comment explaining the purpose and usage of the PropertyTextHash? This would help future maintainers understand its significance. 2. The Expiry date at the VendorInfo level matches the item-level expiries. Consider if this redundancy is necessary, or if it would be more efficient to have a single Expiry at the VendorInfo level and only specify different dates for items that expire earlier. Consider adding a comment explaining the PropertyTextHash: ```diff ], + // PropertyTextHash is used for [explain purpose here] "PropertyTextHash": "946131D0CF5CDF7C2C03BB967DE0DF49", "Expiry": { "$date": { "$numberLong": "9999999000000" } } } } ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `7-97`: **LGTM: ItemManifest structure is consistent and comprehensive.** The `ItemManifest` array correctly includes multiple Deimos fish part items, each with a complete set of properties. This structure allows for efficient retrieval and display of vendor items. Consider optimizing the `PremiumPrice` property. Currently, it's an array with two identical values (e.g., `[9, 9]`). If this duplication is intentional, please add a comment explaining its purpose. Otherwise, consider simplifying it to a single value. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest.json (2)</summary><blockquote> `7-118`: **LGTM! Consider adding item descriptions.** The ItemManifest array structure is well-organized and consistent across all items. Each item contains all necessary information for vendor transactions. To enhance user experience and provide more context, consider adding a "Description" field for each item. This could help users understand the purpose or benefits of each item without needing to reference external documentation. Example addition: ```json { "StoreItem": "/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/ShipDecos/Venus/SUToolBox", "Description": "A versatile toolbox for ship maintenance and repairs.", // ... other existing fields } ``` --- `10-16`: **LGTM! Consider diversifying product categories.** The ItemPrices structure provides flexibility for multiple pricing options and currency types, which is excellent for complex economies within the game. However, I noticed that the ProductCategory is consistently set to "MiscItems" for all items. Consider diversifying the product categories to provide more specific classifications. This could improve filtering and categorization in the user interface and potentially aid in analytics. For example: ```json { "ItemPrices": [ { "ItemType": "/Lotus/Types/Items/Solaris/DebtTokenB", "ItemCount": 6, "ProductCategory": "ShipDecorations" } ] } ``` To verify the current usage of ProductCategory across all vendor manifests, you can run: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for ProductCategory usage in all vendor manifest files rg -g '*.json' -i '"ProductCategory":\s*"(\w+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` This will help you understand if "MiscItems" is used consistently across all vendors or if there's already some categorization in place. Also applies to: 31-37, 52-58, 73-84, 99-105 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosPetVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `7-127`: **LGTM! Consider using enums for rarity levels.** The pricing of items follows a logical pattern based on their rarity (Rare > Uncommon > Common). This is a good approach for maintaining balance in the game economy. Consider using enums or constants for rarity levels (e.g., RARE, UNCOMMON, COMMON) in the `StoreItem` paths. This would improve code readability and maintain consistency across the codebase. For example: ```python from enum import Enum class Rarity(Enum): COMMON = "Common" UNCOMMON = "Uncommon" RARE = "Rare" # Usage in StoreItem path f"/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/Deimos/AnimalTagInfested{item_name}{Rarity.RARE.value}" ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `7-213`: **LGTM! Consistent `ItemManifest` structure.** The `ItemManifest` array is well-structured, with each item containing consistent properties. The use of path-like strings for `StoreItem` suggests a organized asset system. Suggestion for improvement: - Consider using a shared `Expiry` value for all items that match the main `VendorInfo` expiry, rather than repeating the same far-future date for each item. This could reduce redundancy and make updates easier in the future. --- `10-30`: **LGTM! Flexible `ItemPrices` structure.** The `ItemPrices` array allows for multiple currencies or items to be used as payment for a single store item, which provides good flexibility in pricing. Suggestions for improvement: 1. Consider diversifying the `ProductCategory` values if there are actually different categories of items. If all items genuinely fall under "MiscItems", consider documenting why this is the case. 2. It might be helpful to add comments or documentation explaining the meaning of the path-like strings used in `ItemType` and how they relate to the game's asset system. 3. Consider adding a brief explanation of how the `ItemCount` values are determined, especially if there's a specific exchange rate system in place. Also applies to: 48-68, 86-96, 114-119, 137-142, 160-170, 188-198 --- `3-5`: **LGTM! Proper use of unique identifiers.** The use of unique ObjectIds for each item in the `ItemManifest` ensures proper identification and referencing. The unique `LocTagRandSeed` values for each entry are also good for generating randomized properties. Suggestion for improvement: - Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining why some `StoreItem` values are repeated across different entries (e.g., lines 9, 47, 85). This could clarify that the same item is intentionally available with different price combinations. Also applies to: 42-44, 80-82, 108-110, 131-133, 154-156, 182-184, 210-212 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json (2)</summary><blockquote> `37-238`: **LGTM: Consistent and diverse item manifests** The remaining item manifests are well-structured and consistent with the first one. They provide a diverse range of offerings with varying item types, quantities, and prices. The consistent use of far future expiry dates and the categorization using different Bins (BIN_0, BIN_1, BIN_2) is noted. Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining the significance of the different Bin values (BIN_0, BIN_1, BIN_2) to improve clarity for future maintenance. --- `240-247`: **LGTM: Metadata fields provide additional context** The metadata fields (PropertyTextHash, RandomSeedType, and Expiry) provide additional context and functionality to the vendor manifest. The use of a hash for text properties and a random seed for flavor text suggests attention to detail in maintaining consistency and adding variety to the user experience. Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and usage of the PropertyTextHash to improve clarity for future maintenance. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `8-28`: **Consider adjusting the expiry date for weekly rotating items.** The Archon Crystal (Amar) is set to rotate weekly (`"RotatedWeekly": true`), but its expiry date is set to a far future date (`"$numberLong": "9999999000000"`). This might cause issues with the rotation mechanism. Consider setting a more appropriate expiry date that aligns with the weekly rotation, or implement a separate rotation mechanism if not already in place. --- `71-101`: **LGTM: Appropriate structure for decorative item with complex pricing.** The Lab Stool (ORKxLabStool) item is well-structured with a complex pricing model using `ItemPrices`. This allows for multiple currency types, which is suitable for decorative items. The `AllowMultipurchase` flag is correctly set to true for this type of item. Consider adding a `Description` field to provide users with more information about the item, which could be useful for the UI. --- `1-245`: **LGTM: Well-structured vendor manifest with minor improvement suggestions.** The EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json file is well-structured and consistently organized. It effectively supports different item types (rare, rotating items and decorative items) with appropriate pricing models. The use of `PropertyTextHash` suggests good practices for integrity checking. Suggestions for improvement: 1. Review the expiry dates for weekly rotating items to ensure proper rotation mechanics. 2. Consider adding a `Description` field to items for better user information in the UI. 3. Evaluate the need for version control of this manifest, perhaps by including a `Version` field at the top level of the JSON structure. Overall, this is a solid implementation of a vendor manifest. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json (2)</summary><blockquote> `8-35`: **Clarify the pricing structure for crew member items.** The item includes both `ItemPrices` and `RegularPrice` properties. It's not immediately clear how these two pricing mechanisms interact or which one takes precedence. Consider adding documentation or comments to explain the relationship between these two pricing methods and when each is used. --- `20-24`: **Consider a more flexible approach to expiry dates.** All items and the main VendorInfo object use the same far-future expiry date (9999999000000). While this works for persistent items, it might limit flexibility for potential time-limited events or promotions. Consider implementing a more dynamic system for managing expiry dates, such as: 1. Using relative dates (e.g., "never" or a duration from the current date). 2. Implementing a separate configuration for time-limited items. 3. Using a special value to indicate "never expires" instead of a far-future date. This would make it easier to manage both persistent and time-limited items in the future. Also applies to: 75-79, 102-106, 129-133, 156-160, 177-181, 198-202, 219-223, 238-242 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM: Overall structure is well-defined.** The VendorInfo object structure is well-organized and consistent with MongoDB document format. The use of ObjectId for `_id` and the path-like structure for `TypeName` are appropriate. Consider using a more specific expiry date if there's an actual expiration for this vendor information, rather than using a far future date as a placeholder for "never expires". Also applies to: 245-254 --- `7-245`: **LGTM: ItemManifest structure is consistent and well-defined.** The ItemManifest array has a consistent structure across all items, with appropriate use of ObjectIds for each item. The StoreItem paths and Bin categorization seem well-organized. Consider the following optimizations: 1. If QuantityMultiplier is always 1, consider removing it to reduce data redundancy. 2. Evaluate if the Expiry field is necessary for individual items if it's always set to the same value as the main VendorInfo object. 3. If AllowMultipurchase is always false, consider making it a default and only including it when true to save space. --- `10-49`: **LGTM: ItemPrices structure allows for flexible pricing.** The ItemPrices structure within each ItemManifest entry is well-designed, allowing for multiple items to be required for a single purchase. The consistent use of ItemType, ItemCount, and ProductCategory provides clear information about each required item. Consider the following suggestions: 1. Ensure that the ProductCategory values ("MiscItems" and "Consumables") are exhaustive. If there are other possible categories, document them for future reference. 2. If applicable, consider adding a description field to each price item to provide more context about why certain items are required for purchase. Also applies to: 66-72, 89-95, 112-128, 145-151, 168-179, 196-202, 219-230 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json (5)</summary><blockquote> `8-28`: **LGTM! Consider adding a description field.** The structure of the SeriglassShard item is well-defined and includes all necessary information for a store item. The AllowMultipurchase flag set to true is appropriate for this type of item. Consider adding a "Description" field to provide more context about the item for easier maintenance and potential future use in user interfaces. --- `29-154`: **LGTM! Consider optimizing the data model for PhotoboothTile items.** The PhotoboothTile items are consistently structured, which is excellent for maintainability. The pricing is uniform across all PhotoboothTile variants, which seems intentional. To optimize the data model and reduce repetition, consider creating a separate "PhotoboothTiles" array within the VendorInfo object. This array could contain only the unique identifiers for each tile variant, while maintaining a single shared price structure. This approach would make future updates to pricing or structure easier to manage across all PhotoboothTile items. --- `155-291`: **LGTM! Document the Bin property usage.** The ShipDecos items are well-structured with appropriate variations in pricing and properties to reflect their unique characteristics. The use of multiple ItemPrices for some items provides flexibility for complex pricing models. Consider adding documentation or comments to explain the significance of different Bin values (e.g., BIN_0, BIN_2). This would improve maintainability and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of this property. --- `244-265`: **LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the unique item.** The RequiemRisGlyph item is well-structured with appropriate properties to enforce a one-time purchase restriction. The use of both PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase is an effective way to implement this limitation. Consider adding a comment or a "UniqueItem" flag to explicitly indicate that this is a special, one-time purchase item. This would improve clarity and make it easier to identify and manage such items in the future. --- `1-300`: **Overall LGTM! Consider standardizing Expiry dates.** The DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json file is well-structured and provides comprehensive vendor information for the Deimos Entrati Fragment. The consistency in item structures and appropriate use of properties for different item types is commendable. Consider standardizing the approach to Expiry dates throughout the file. The current use of a very large number (9999999000000) for all Expiry fields might be a placeholder. It would be beneficial to either: 1. Replace this with a more meaningful future date if an actual expiry is intended. 2. Use a specific value (e.g., null or a designated "never expires" constant) to indicate items that don't expire. 3. Remove the Expiry field for items that don't have a meaningful expiration. This standardization would improve clarity and make it easier to manage and update expiration dates in the future. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest.json (4)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM! Consider adding a version field for future-proofing.** The main `VendorInfo` structure is well-organized and provides essential information about the vendor. The use of `$oid` for the `_id` field suggests compatibility with MongoDB, which is good for database integration. Consider adding a `version` field to the `VendorInfo` object. This would allow for easier tracking of changes to the manifest structure in future updates. ```diff { "VendorInfo": { "_id": { "$oid": "5fb70313c96976e97d6be6fe" }, + "version": "1.0", "TypeName": "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Deimos/HivemindTokenVendorManifest", // ... rest of the object } } ``` Also applies to: 277-286 --- `8-40`: **LGTM! Consider clarifying the `Expiry` field representation.** The structure of items in the `ItemManifest` is well-designed, allowing for flexible pricing and purchase options. The use of `$oid` for the `Id` field is consistent with the main object's `_id`, which is good for maintaining data integrity. The `Expiry` field uses a very large number (`9999999000000`), which likely represents "never expires". Consider using a more explicit representation for improved readability and maintainability. For example: ```diff "Expiry": { "$date": { - "$numberLong": "9999999000000" + "$numberLong": "253402300799000" // Represents "9999-12-31T23:59:59Z" } } ``` Alternatively, you could use a special value or flag to indicate "never expires" if that's the intended behavior. Also applies to: 275-277 --- `10-25`: **LGTM! Consider diversifying the `ProductCategory` field.** The `ItemPrices` structure within each item is well-designed, allowing for complex pricing using multiple in-game items as currency. The use of paths for `ItemType` provides a clear and hierarchical representation of in-game items. All `ProductCategory` values are currently set to "MiscItems", which might be too generic. Consider diversifying this field to provide more specific categorization. This could improve filtering and organization of items in the user interface. For example: ```diff "ItemPrices": [ { "ItemType": "/Lotus/Types/Items/Fish/Deimos/FishParts/DeimosInfestedFishBPartItem", "ItemCount": 36, - "ProductCategory": "MiscItems" + "ProductCategory": "FishParts" }, { "ItemType": "/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/InfestedMicroplanet/Resources/InfGorgaricusSeedItem", "ItemCount": 32, - "ProductCategory": "MiscItems" + "ProductCategory": "Resources" } ] ``` This change would require updating the `ProductCategory` for all items in the manifest, but it would provide more meaningful categorization for each item type. Also applies to: 41-58, 75-91, 109-124, 142-157, 175-195, 213-228, 246-261 --- `1-286`: **LGTM! Consider future scalability for large numbers of items.** The overall structure and content of the DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest are well-organized and comprehensive. The manifest provides a detailed list of 8 store items, each with unique combinations of required items for purchase. The consistent structure across all items demonstrates good data modeling practices. As the game evolves and potentially adds more items to this vendor, consider the following suggestions for improved scalability and maintenance: 1. Implement pagination or chunking mechanisms for the `ItemManifest` array. This would allow for efficient loading of large numbers of items without overwhelming the client or server. 2. Consider moving common properties (like `Expiry` and `PurchaseQuantityLimit`) to a higher level in the structure if they rarely change between items. This could reduce redundancy and file size. 3. Implement a versioning system for the manifest structure to allow for backwards compatibility as the structure evolves. Example of a versioned, paginated structure: ```json { "VendorInfo": { "version": "1.1", "TypeName": "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Deimos/HivemindTokenVendorManifest", "CommonProperties": { "Expiry": {"$date": {"$numberLong": "9999999000000"}}, "PurchaseQuantityLimit": 1, "AllowMultipurchase": false }, "ItemManifestMeta": { "totalItems": 8, "pageSize": 50, "currentPage": 1 }, "ItemManifest": [ // ... items ... ], // ... other properties ... } } ``` These changes would make the manifest more robust and easier to maintain as the game grows and evolves. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM! Consider adding a version field.** The main `VendorInfo` structure is well-organized and provides essential information about the vendor. The use of MongoDB ObjectId for `_id` is appropriate if this data is stored in a MongoDB database. Consider adding a `version` field to the `VendorInfo` object to facilitate future updates and backward compatibility. --- `7-35`: **LGTM! Consider optimizing the `Expiry` and `Id` fields.** The structure of items in the `ItemManifest` is consistent and well-organized, providing detailed information about each store item. 1. The `Expiry` field uses a very large number (`9999999000000`), which seems to represent "never expires". Consider using a more explicit representation, such as `null` or a dedicated "never expires" value. 2. The `Id` field appears to be a MongoDB ObjectId. If this is not used for specific item lookups, consider removing it to reduce redundancy, as the `StoreItem` field already provides a unique identifier. Example refactor for the `Expiry` field: ```diff "Expiry": { "$date": { - "$numberLong": "9999999000000" + "$numberLong": null } }, ``` If you decide to keep the `Id` field, ensure it serves a specific purpose in your application logic. --- `304-311`: **LGTM! Consider adding documentation for clarity.** The additional properties at the end of the `VendorInfo` object provide important metadata for the vendor manifest. To improve clarity and maintainability, consider adding inline documentation or comments explaining the purpose and usage of these fields: 1. `PropertyTextHash`: Explain its purpose (e.g., for integrity checking or caching). 2. `RandomSeedType`: Describe how "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT" is used in the application. 3. `Expiry`: Clarify if this represents the expiration of the entire vendor manifest and how it relates to the individual item expiry dates. Example: ```json { "PropertyTextHash": "0AC3C284471037011B36EC51238D13A9", // Used for integrity checking of the manifest "RandomSeedType": "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT", // Used to generate random flavor text for vendor interactions "Expiry": { // Represents the expiration of the entire vendor manifest "$date": { "$numberLong": "9999999000000" } } } ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `65-67`: **Typographical error in 'HivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith'** The filename and import `DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith` may contain a typo in "Commisions" (should be "Commissions"). Ensure consistency in naming to prevent potential issues. If "Commisions" is a typo, consider renaming the files and references: ```diff -import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json"; +import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith.json"; ``` And update the switch case accordingly: ```diff case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Deimos/HivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith": - res.json(DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith); + res.json(DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith); ``` --- `29-123`: **Maintain consistent ordering of vendor cases** Consider grouping the vendor cases logically or alphabetically to improve readability. This can help future developers navigate the code more efficiently. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76964585ebd5145dc8c86bdd1075c40d23e48859 and 008e75215c1212d52c2bd3bb231de8ee6fa63c25. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (22)</summary> * src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosPetVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabsCommisionsManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (51)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-61`: **LGTM! File aligns well with PR objectives.** This new `DeimosProspectorVendorManifest.json` file is well-structured, consistent, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of adding missing vendor information. It successfully introduces vendor data for the Deimos region, as mentioned in the PR summary. The file provides a complete vendor manifest with appropriate item details, pricing, and other necessary information. This addition will contribute to resolving the issues related to missing vendor information in the application. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `7-53`: **LGTM! Clarify the purpose of the `PremiumPrice` array.** The `ItemManifest` array is well-structured and consistent across all items. The `StoreItem` paths correctly reference Solaris gems, aligning with the vendor type. However, the `PremiumPrice` property is an array with two identical values for each item. Could you clarify the purpose of this array structure? If it's not intentional, consider simplifying it to a single value. ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar PremiumPrice structures in other vendor manifests # Test: Search for PremiumPrice arrays in other JSON files rg --type json '"PremiumPrice": \[[0-9]+, [0-9]+\]' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` --- `54-54`: **Please clarify the purpose of `PropertyTextHash`.** The `PropertyTextHash` value is present, but its purpose and generation method are not clear from the context. Could you provide more information about: 1. The purpose of this hash (e.g., integrity checking, unique identification)? 2. How this hash is generated? 3. Where and how this hash is used in the application? This information will help ensure that the hash is being used correctly and consistently across the application. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>  **`PropertyTextHash` is consistently used across vendor manifest files and does not impact application code.** </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for PropertyTextHash usage in other files # Test: Search for PropertyTextHash in other JSON files and application code rg --type json '"PropertyTextHash"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ rg 'PropertyTextHash' src/ ``` Length of output: 3382 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for PropertyTextHash across the entire codebase # Search for PropertyTextHash in all file types rg 'PropertyTextHash' . ``` Length of output: 3351 </details> --- `1-7`: **LGTM! Consider reviewing the expiry date.** The overall structure of the `VendorInfo` object is well-formed and consistent with MongoDB document format. The `TypeName` correctly identifies this as a Solaris Prospector vendor manifest, which aligns with the PR objectives. However, the `Expiry` date is set to a very distant future (year 2286). Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be set to a more reasonable date. Also applies to: 54-61 <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> **Expiry date appears intentional and unique.** The `Expiry` date in `SolarisProspectorVendorManifest.json` is set to a distant future date and does not match the `Expiry` dates in any other vendor manifests. This suggests that the date is intentionally configured for this specific vendor. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other vendor manifests with similar expiry dates # Test: Search for the expiry date pattern in other JSON files rg --type json '"\\$numberLong": "9999999000000"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` Length of output: 3757 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date # Test: Search for the exact expiry date pattern in JSON files rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*{\s*"\\$numberLong":\s*"9999999000000"\s*}' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` Length of output: 261 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date # Test: Search for the exact expiry date pattern in JSON files rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"9999999000000"\s*}' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` Length of output: 259 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date # Test: Search for the exact expiry date pattern in JSON files with escaped curly braces rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*\{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"9999999000000"\s*\}' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` Length of output: 112 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for vendor manifests with the specific expiry date # Test: Find JSON files where VendorInfo.Expiry.$numberLong equals "9999999000000" for file in static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json; do if jq -e '.VendorInfo.Expiry."$numberLong" == "9999999000000"' "$file" > /dev/null; then echo "$file" fi done ``` Length of output: 4719 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **Verify the `MaxDailyPurchases` and `Expiry` settings** The `MaxDailyPurchases` is set to 0, which might indicate no limit on daily purchases. Please confirm if this is intentional, as it's unusual for a vendor to have no purchase limits. Additionally, the `Expiry` date is set to a very high value (`9999999000000`). This effectively means the vendor or its items never expire. Verify if this is the desired behavior or if a more reasonable expiration date should be set. Also applies to: 54-61 --- `1-62`: **Overall structure and consistency look good** The JSON structure for the Ostron Prospector Vendor Manifest is well-organized and consistent. Key observations: 1. The `StoreItem` paths follow a logical pattern. 2. `Bin` values ("BIN_0" and "BIN_1") are used consistently, likely representing different item categories or rarities. 3. `AllowMultipurchase` is set to true for all items, aligning with the unlimited `MaxDailyPurchases`. 4. Each item has a unique `Id`. The data structure appears to be well-designed for its purpose of representing vendor information and available items. --- `1-62`: **File successfully addresses PR objectives** This new `OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json` file directly contributes to the PR's objective of adding missing vendor information. While it doesn't specifically address the Acrithis vendor mentioned in issue #562, it follows a similar structure that could be applied to other missing vendor manifests. The file provides a complete vendor manifest for the Ostron Prospector, including detailed item information, pricing, and purchase rules. This addition will help resolve the broader issue of missing vendor information in the application. To fully meet the PR objectives, ensure that similar manifests are created for other missing vendors, particularly Acrithis, as mentioned in the linked issue #562. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json (4)</summary><blockquote> `1-94`: **LGTM: Well-structured vendor manifest** The overall structure of the `OstronPetVendorManifest.json` file is well-organized and consistent with vendor information storage. It includes all necessary components such as vendor identification, type specification, item manifest, and expiry information. --- `8-33`: **LGTM: Well-defined store item for Liset Prop Ostron Bird Cage** The structure and content of this store item are well-defined and consistent with the expected format. The use of in-game items as currency (Uncommon Ore A Alloy A Item and Day Uncommon Fish B Part Item) is appropriate for the game's economy. --- `34-59`: **LGTM: Well-defined store item for Kubrow Color Pack Drahk** The structure and content of this store item are well-defined and consistent with the expected format. The use of fish parts (Day Common Fish B Part Item and Both Common Fish B Part Item) as currency is appropriate for the Ostron faction's theme and the game's economy. --- `60-85`: **LGTM: Well-defined store item for Kubrow Color Pack Feral** The structure and content of this store item are well-defined and consistent with the expected format. The use of fish parts (Both Common Fish A Part Item) and ore (Common Ore B Alloy B Item) as currency is appropriate for the Ostron faction's theme and the game's economy. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabsCommisionsManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM! Main `VendorInfo` structure is well-formed.** The overall structure of the `VendorInfo` object is consistent and well-organized. It includes all necessary fields such as `_id`, `TypeName`, `ItemManifest`, `PropertyTextHash`, and `Expiry`. Note: The `Expiry` date is set to a very far future date (approximately year 2286). This appears intentional, possibly indicating that these items don't expire or have a very long shelf life. Also applies to: 89-97 --- `8-34`: **LGTM! First `ItemManifest` entry is well-structured.** The first item in the `ItemManifest` array is well-structured and contains all necessary information for a store item. The use of `$oid` for the `Id` field is consistent with the MongoDB ObjectId format used in the main object. The `ItemPrices` array allows for multiple currencies or resources to be used for purchasing, which provides flexibility in the pricing model. Note: The `Expiry` date for this item matches the main `VendorInfo` expiry, maintaining consistency throughout the document. --- `1-97`: **LGTM! File maintains overall consistency with interesting cross-region items.** The file maintains excellent consistency throughout: - All ObjectIds (`$oid`) are unique, ensuring proper database referencing. - Expiry dates are consistently set to a far future date across all items and the main object. Interesting observation: While the `TypeName` references "EntratiLabs", some `ItemType` values reference "Zariman" (e.g., line 71). This suggests cross-region or cross-faction item availability, which could be an intentional game design choice for item diversity or story progression. To ensure this cross-region referencing is intentional and consistent with other vendor manifests, you may want to run the following verification script: This script will help identify if cross-region item types are a common pattern across vendor manifests or if this is unique to the Entrati Labs manifest. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>  **Verified! Cross-region item types are consistently used across multiple vendor manifests, aligning with the intended design.** All instances of cross-region `ItemType` references are part of a consistent and intentional pattern within the codebase, ensuring diverse item availability across different regions and factions. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for cross-region item types in vendor manifests # Test: Search for item types referencing different regions within the same manifest rg --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!EntratiLab).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabs*.json # Test: Check if this pattern exists in other vendor manifests rg --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!.*Manifest).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json ``` Length of output: 2732 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for cross-region item types in vendor manifests using PCRE2 # Test: Search for item types referencing different regions within the same manifest rg --pcre2 --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!EntratiLab).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabs*.json # Test: Check if this pattern exists in other vendor manifests rg --pcre2 --type json '"ItemType":.*"/Lotus/Types/Gameplay/(?!.*Manifest).*"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json ``` Length of output: 15249 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `10-10`: **Clarify the purpose of duplicate values in `PremiumPrice`** The `PremiumPrice` field contains two identical values for each item. This might be intentional, but it's worth clarifying to ensure it's not a data entry error or unnecessary redundancy. Could you please explain the reason for having duplicate values in the `PremiumPrice` array? If it's intentional, consider adding a comment in the code or documentation to explain its purpose. If it's unintentional, you may want to simplify it to a single value. Also applies to: 25-25, 40-40, 55-55, 70-70, 85-85 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-106`: **Great addition addressing the missing vendor information!** This new `SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json` file successfully adds the missing vendor information, addressing the PR objectives. The structure is well-organized, consistent, and allows for easy maintenance and expansion of the vendor's inventory. A few points to consider for further improvement: 1. Clarify the usage of the PremiumPrice array and Bin values. 2. Review the necessity of redundant Expiry dates. 3. Add documentation for the PropertyTextHash. Overall, this addition will resolve the issues related to missing vendor information and improve the functionality of the vendor system. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM: Main VendorInfo structure is well-formed and aligns with PR objectives.** The `VendorInfo` object structure is correct and includes all necessary high-level information for the Deimos Fishmonger vendor. This addition directly addresses the PR objective of including missing vendor information, specifically for the Deimos region. Also applies to: 98-106 --- `1-106`: **Overall, the DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json is well-structured and aligns with PR objectives.** This new file successfully addresses the PR objective of adding missing vendor information, specifically for the Deimos region. The structure is consistent with expected vendor manifest formats and provides comprehensive information about the Deimos Fishmonger and its available items. While some minor optimizations and clarifications have been suggested, the overall implementation is solid and should integrate well with the existing vendor information system. This addition will help resolve the issues mentioned in #562 and #560 by providing the necessary vendor manifest for Deimos. --- `99-104`: **Please clarify the purpose of PropertyTextHash and review the necessity of the overall Expiry.** 1. The `PropertyTextHash` appears to be a hash of the vendor's properties. Could you please add a comment explaining its specific purpose and how it's used in the application? 2. The overall `Expiry` is set to the same far-future date as the individual items. If this is meant to represent a "never expires" state for the entire vendor, consider using a more explicit representation or removing it if it's redundant with the item-level expiry dates. To check the consistency of `PropertyTextHash` and overall `Expiry` across vendor manifests, please run the following script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of PropertyTextHash and overall Expiry across vendor manifests # Test: Check for unique PropertyTextHash values echo "Checking unique PropertyTextHash values:" rg '"PropertyTextHash":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c # Test: Check for unique overall Expiry values echo "Checking unique overall Expiry values:" rg -A 3 '"Expiry": \{' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | paste - - - - | sort | uniq -c ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM! Consider reviewing the expiry date.** The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-formed and consistent with MongoDB document structures. The TypeName provides a clear indication of the vendor and manifest type. However, the Expiry date is set to a very high value (9999999000000). While this effectively means "never expires," it might be worth considering if this is the intended behavior or if a more reasonable expiration date should be set. To verify the usage of this expiry date across other vendor manifests, you can run the following command: This will help ensure consistency across vendor manifests and confirm if this is a standard practice or an oversight. Also applies to: 119-126 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosPetVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-136`: **LGTM! Verify the expiry date.** The overall structure of the JSON file is well-organized and appropriate for a vendor manifest. The use of MongoDB's ObjectId format for `_id` ensures unique identification. Please verify if the expiry date set to "9999999000000" (year 2286) is intentional or if it should be set to a more reasonable future date. --- `7-127`: **Verify consistent values and explain multipliers.** The `ItemManifest` array is well-structured with consistent properties for each item. However, there are some patterns that might need verification or explanation: 1. All items use "BIN_0" for the `Bin` property. Is this intentional or should there be different bins? 2. The `QuantityMultiplier` is set to 5 for all items. Please explain the purpose of this multiplier. 3. The `PremiumPrice` is an array with two identical values. Is this redundancy necessary? Please confirm if these consistent values are intentional and provide explanations for their usage. --- `1-136`: **Overall, well-structured manifest with minor suggestions for improvement.** The `DeimosPetVendorManifest.json` file is well-organized and follows a logical structure for a vendor manifest. The pricing strategy based on item rarity is sound. Here's a summary of the suggestions: 1. Verify the far-future expiry dates (year 2286) to ensure they are intentional. 2. Confirm the consistent use of "BIN_0" and explain the purpose of the `QuantityMultiplier`. 3. Consider using enums or constants for rarity levels to improve code consistency and readability. These minor improvements will enhance the maintainability and clarity of the manifest. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json (2)</summary><blockquote> `1-6`: **LGTM! Well-structured vendor information.** The overall structure of the `VendorInfo` object is well-organized and consistent with typical vendor information schemas. The use of ObjectId for `_id` suggests compatibility with MongoDB. One observation: - The `Expiry` date is set to a very far future date (line 219). This might indicate that this vendor's offerings don't have a specific expiration. Ensure this is the intended behavior. Also applies to: 215-223 --- `1-223`: **Overall LGTM! Well-structured vendor information file.** This new JSON file successfully addresses the issue of missing vendor information for the Deimos Hivemind Commissions Manifest Token Vendor. The structure is consistent, well-organized, and allows for flexible pricing and item offerings. Key strengths: 1. Consistent use of ObjectIds for unique identification. 2. Flexible `ItemPrices` structure allowing multiple currencies per item. 3. Well-defined properties for each store item. While the file is generally well-implemented, consider the minor suggestions provided in previous comments to further improve documentation and potentially refactor some repeated values. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-248`: **LGTM: Well-structured vendor manifest** The overall structure of the JSON file is well-organized and consistent. It provides a clear representation of the Solaris Debt Token vendor information, including metadata and an array of item manifests. The use of MongoDB-style ObjectId and date format suggests compatibility with MongoDB storage. --- `8-36`: **LGTM: Well-defined item manifest for DebtTokenBundleUncommonD** The item manifest for DebtTokenBundleUncommonD is well-structured and provides clear information about the bundle contents, pricing, and purchase conditions. The use of specific item types and counts enhances clarity. --- `1-248`: **Overall assessment: Well-implemented vendor manifest** This new SolarisDebtTokenVendorManifest.json file successfully addresses the need for vendor information as mentioned in the PR objectives. The implementation is consistent, well-structured, and allows for easy future modifications or additions to the item manifests. Key strengths: 1. Clear and consistent structure for vendor information and item manifests. 2. Diverse range of offerings with varying item types, quantities, and prices. 3. Use of categorization (Bins) and metadata fields for additional functionality. Minor suggestions for improvement: 1. Add documentation explaining the significance of different Bin values. 2. Include a comment describing the purpose and usage of the PropertyTextHash. These minor improvements would enhance the maintainability of the code for future developers. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/EntratiLabsEntratiLabVendorManifest.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-245`: **LGTM: Overall structure is well-organized and consistent.** The JSON structure for the Entrati Labs vendor manifest is well-organized and follows a consistent pattern. It includes essential information such as vendor identification, type, item manifest, and expiry date. The use of MongoDB-style ObjectId and date formats suggests compatibility with MongoDB, which is a good choice for flexible document storage. --- `29-70`: **Consistent structure for Archon Crystals, but expiry date issue persists.** The Archon Crystals (Boreal and Nira) maintain a consistent structure with the Amar crystal, which is good for maintainability. However, they also share the same far future expiry date issue mentioned in the previous comment. Consider addressing this for all weekly rotating items. --- `102-236`: **LGTM: Consistent structure and appropriate pricing for decorative items.** The remaining decorative items (chair and various lights) maintain a consistent structure with the Lab Stool, which is excellent for code maintainability. Each item appropriately uses the `ItemPrices` array to define its unique pricing structure, demonstrating the flexibility of this approach. The `AllowMultipurchase` flag is correctly set to true for all these decorative items. The use of a far future expiry date is acceptable for these non-rotating items, ensuring their long-term availability in the store. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM! Main "VendorInfo" structure is well-organized.** The overall structure of the "VendorInfo" object is well-organized and consistent with typical JSON configurations for vendor information. The use of ObjectId for "_id" is appropriate for unique identification, and the "TypeName" accurately describes the vendor type. Could you confirm if the far future expiry date (9999999000000) is intentional? This date is set for both the main "VendorInfo" object and all individual items. If this is intended as a "never expire" value, consider using a more explicit representation or adding a comment to clarify the intention. Also applies to: 232-241 --- `7-231`: **Verify repeated "StoreItem" values and global settings in "ItemManifest".** The "ItemManifest" array has a consistent structure for each item, which is great for maintainability. However, there are a few points to consider: 1. The "StoreItem" value "/Lotus/Types/StoreItems/Packages/Tasks/Deimos/Daughter/DaughterTaskA" is repeated for multiple items (lines 65, 93, 121, 149, 177). Is this intentional or a potential error? 2. The values for "QuantityMultiplier" (1), "PurchaseQuantityLimit" (1), and "AllowMultipurchase" (false) are the same for all items. If these are meant to be global settings, consider moving them to a higher level in the JSON structure to reduce redundancy. 3. The "Bin" values vary between "BIN_0", "BIN_1", and "BIN_2". Ensure this categorization is correct and aligns with the intended store layout. Please review these points and confirm if they align with the intended design. If any adjustments are needed, please make the necessary changes. --- `10-21`: **LGTM! "ItemPrices" structure is consistent. Consider reviewing "ProductCategory" usage.** The "ItemPrices" array within each item has a consistent and well-structured format. The use of path-like structures for "ItemType" aligns well with the overall naming convention in the file. The varying "ItemCount" values appropriately reflect different quantities for different items. All "ProductCategory" values are set to "MiscItems". While this might be intentional, consider if more specific categories could be beneficial for better organization or filtering of items. If "MiscItems" is indeed the correct category for all these items, then the current implementation is fine. Also applies to: 38-49, 66-77, 94-105, 122-133, 150-161, 178-189, 206-217 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json (2)</summary><blockquote> `1-244`: **LGTM: Overall structure is well-organized and consistent.** The JSON structure for the Railjack Crew Member Vendor Manifest is well-organized and follows a consistent pattern. The use of MongoDB-style ObjectIds for unique identifiers and the far-future expiry date are appropriate for this type of game data. --- `1-244`: **Summary: Well-structured manifest with minor inconsistencies and potential improvements.** The HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json file is well-structured and serves its purpose of defining a vendor manifest for Railjack crew members. However, there are a few areas that could be improved: 1. Standardize the pricing structure across all items (ItemPrices vs RegularPrice). 2. Verify the intentional use of different currencies for different syndicate items. 3. Consider implementing a more flexible system for managing expiry dates. These improvements would enhance the consistency and maintainability of the manifest. Please review the suggested changes and update the file accordingly. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-254`: **LGTM: Overall consistency is excellent.** The file demonstrates excellent consistency in structure and data modeling. The use of unique ObjectIds for each entity is correct and follows best practices. Please clarify the following points: 1. The purpose and usage of the LocTagRandSeed field. 2. The intention behind setting all Expiry dates to the far future. Is this a placeholder, or are these items truly meant to never expire? 3. The significance of the PropertyTextHash field and how it's generated or used. To assist in verifying the uniqueness of ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values, you can run the following script: <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>  **LGTM: ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values are unique.** The shell script verification confirmed that all ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values are unique, ensuring data integrity. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Verify uniqueness of ObjectIds and LocTagRandSeed values echo "Checking ObjectId uniqueness:" jq -r '.. | objects | select(has("$oid")) | .["$oid"]' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json | sort | uniq -d echo "Checking LocTagRandSeed uniqueness:" jq -r '.. | objects | select(has("LocTagRandSeed")) | .LocTagRandSeed' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json | sort | uniq -d # If these commands produce no output, it means all values are unique ``` Length of output: 485 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM! Verify the Expiry date setting.** The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-formed and consistent with MongoDB document format. The TypeName follows a logical path structure, which is good for maintainability. However, the Expiry date is set to a very large number (9999999000000). Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be set to a more reasonable future date. Also applies to: 292-300 </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json (4)</summary><blockquote> `36-277`: **LGTM! Consider documenting the categorization system and pricing logic.** The structure remains consistent across all items in the ItemManifest, which is excellent for maintainability. The variation in StoreItem paths (SonTaskA, SonTaskB, SonTaskC, SonTaskD) and Bin values (BIN_0, BIN_1, BIN_2, BIN_3) suggests a categorization system. Additionally, the different combinations of item types and counts in ItemPrices indicate a complex pricing system. To improve clarity and maintainability: 1. Consider adding comments or documentation explaining the categorization system (e.g., what each SonTask and BIN represents). 2. Document the pricing logic and how different combinations of item types and counts are determined. To verify the distribution of SonTask types and BIN values, run the following script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the distribution of SonTask types and BIN values # Test: Count occurrences of each SonTask type echo "SonTask distribution:" rg --type json '"StoreItem":\s*"/Lotus/Types/StoreItems/Packages/Tasks/Deimos/Son/SonTask([A-D])"' -o --replace '$1' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json | sort | uniq -c # Test: Count occurrences of each BIN value echo -e "\nBIN distribution:" rg --type json '"Bin":\s*"(BIN_[0-3])"' -o --replace '$1' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json | sort | uniq -c ``` --- `8-35`: **LGTM! Consider reviewing PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase fields.** The structure of the first item in the ItemManifest is well-organized and provides detailed information about the store item and its pricing. However, the PurchaseQuantityLimit is set to 1 and AllowMultipurchase is set to false. If this pattern is consistent across all items, consider if both fields are necessary or if the logic can be simplified. To verify the usage of PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase across all items, run the following script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase # Test: Search for PurchaseQuantityLimit and AllowMultipurchase in the JSON file rg --type json '"PurchaseQuantityLimit":\s*(\d+),\s*"AllowMultipurchase":\s*(true|false)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json ``` --- `1-287`: **LGTM! File structure addresses the PR objectives.** The overall structure and content of the file are well-organized and consistent. This new JSON file for the "Deimos Hivemind Commissions Manifest Pet Vendor" directly addresses the PR objective of adding missing vendor information to the system. The file includes: 1. A unique identifier for the vendor 2. A type name indicating the vendor's category 3. An item manifest detailing various store items available for purchase 4. Consistent structure for each item, including pricing, purchase limits, and expiry information This addition should resolve the issues related to missing vendor information (issues #562 and #560) mentioned in the PR objectives. To verify that this file addresses the missing vendor information, run the following script to check for the presence of key vendor information: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of key vendor information # Test: Check for the presence of essential vendor information fields essential_fields=("_id" "TypeName" "ItemManifest" "PropertyTextHash" "RandomSeedType" "Expiry") for field in "${essential_fields[@]}"; do if rg --type json "\"$field\"" static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json > /dev/null; then echo "✓ $field is present" else echo "✗ $field is missing" fi done # Test: Check if the file contains item information if rg --type json '"StoreItem"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json > /dev/null; then echo "✓ File contains item information" else echo "✗ File does not contain item information" fi ``` --- `1-7`: **LGTM! Consider reviewing the Expiry date.** The overall structure of the VendorInfo object is well-organized and consistent. The use of MongoDB ObjectId and path-like TypeName is appropriate. However, the Expiry date is set to a very large number (9999999000000), which effectively means "never expires". Please review if this is the intended behavior for this vendor. To verify the expiry date usage across other vendor files, run the following script: Also applies to: 278-287 <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>  **Verified Expiry Dates Consistency** All vendor JSON files consistently set the Expiry date to `9999999000000`, indicating that these vendors are intended to never expire. This uniformity confirms that the Expiry date configuration is correctly applied across the codebase. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of expiry dates across vendor files # Test: Search for Expiry fields in all vendor JSON files rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*{\s*"\$date":\s*{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"(\d+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` Length of output: 1562 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Extract Expiry date values from all vendor JSON files to check for consistency rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*\{\s*"\$date":\s*\{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"(\d+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ -o | grep -o '"\$numberLong":\s*"[^"]*"' | awk -F'"\$numberLong":' '{print $2}' | tr -d ' "' ``` Length of output: 275 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Extract Expiry date values from all vendor JSON files to check for consistency # Improved regex without unnecessary escaping and streamlined command pipeline rg --type json '"Expiry":\s*\{\s*"\$date":\s*\{\s*"\$numberLong":\s*"(\d+)"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ -o | grep -o '"\$numberLong":\s*"[^"]*"' | awk -F'":' '{print $2}' | tr -d ' "' ``` Length of output: 336 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindTokenVendorManifest.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `278-279`: **Please clarify the purpose of `PropertyTextHash` and `RandomSeedType`.** The `PropertyTextHash` and `RandomSeedType` fields are present in the manifest, but their purpose and usage are not immediately clear from the context. Could you provide more information on: 1. The purpose and usage of the `PropertyTextHash` field? 2. The significance of the "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT" value for `RandomSeedType`? Consider adding inline documentation or comments to explain these fields. For example: ```diff { "VendorInfo": { // ... other fields ... + // Hash used for verifying the integrity of text properties "PropertyTextHash": "C34BF0BEDEAF7CBB0EEBFFECDFD6646D", + // Indicates that this vendor uses randomized flavor text "RandomSeedType": "VRST_FLAVOUR_TEXT", // ... remaining fields ... } } ``` This documentation would help future developers understand the purpose and usage of these fields. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json (5)</summary><blockquote> `1-7`: **LGTM: VendorInfo structure addresses the PR objectives.** The `VendorInfo` object structure is well-formed and includes all necessary top-level fields. The `TypeName` "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Duviri/AcrithisVendorManifest" correctly identifies this as the Acrithis vendor manifest, which directly addresses the issue #562 mentioned in the PR objectives. Also applies to: 313-321 --- `8-28`: **LGTM: First ItemManifest entry is well-structured.** The "DangerRoomTileDuviriDragonArena" item is correctly defined with appropriate pricing and purchase rules. The structure is consistent with expected vendor item entries. --- `139-268`: **LGTM: Diverse item selection with appropriate pricing and purchase rules.** This section of the `ItemManifest` includes a good variety of items such as resources (Plastids, Neural Sensors, Control Modules) and decorative items (DUVxPlanterHangingPot, DUVxPlanterPotB). The pricing using Duviri-specific resources (e.g., DuviriPlantItemD, DuviriRockItem) is consistent with the vendor's location. The mix of items with different purchase rules (some allowing multiple purchases, others with limits) provides a balanced vendor offering. --- `269-312`: **LGTM: Special items enhance vendor offerings.** The final items in the `ItemManifest` include a cosmetic enhancer (HealthWhileUsingChanneledAbilities) and a Duviri-specific boon (DuviriVendorBoonItem). These special items add depth to the vendor's offerings. The purchase rules for these items (limited purchase for the enhancer, multiple purchases allowed for the boon) are appropriate given their unique nature. --- `29-138`: **LGTM with a note: Consistent item structure, but potential duplicate entry.** The items "FormaBlueprint", "UtilityUnlocker", "Kuva", and "WeaponUtilityUnlocker" are well-structured with appropriate purchase limits. However, there appears to be a duplicate entry for the "Kuva" item (lines 74-94 and 118-138). Please verify if this duplication is intentional or if one entry should be removed or modified. ```shell #!/bin/bash # Verify if the duplicate Kuva entry is present in other vendor manifests rg --json -g '*.json' '"StoreItem": "/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva"' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ | jq -c '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-312`: **Overall, the vendor manifest is well-structured and addresses the PR objectives.** This new JSON file for the Deimos Hivemind Commissions Manifest Prospector successfully adds the missing vendor information, addressing the objectives mentioned in the PR summary and linked issues. The file structure is consistent and provides a comprehensive representation of the vendor's offerings. The suggestions made in the previous comments, if implemented, will further improve the clarity, maintainability, and efficiency of the manifest. Key points to address: 1. Consider adding a version field to the main `VendorInfo` object. 2. Optimize the `Expiry` field representation. 3. Clarify the purpose of repeated `StoreItem` values with different `Bin` values. 4. Add documentation for the additional properties (`PropertyTextHash`, `RandomSeedType`, `Expiry`). These improvements will enhance the overall quality of the vendor manifest and make it easier for other developers to work with this data in the future. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `105-107`: **Duplicate case for ArchimedeanVendorManifest** The case for `"/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Zariman/ArchimedeanVendorManifest"` seems to duplicate functionality if it already exists elsewhere in the switch statement. Verify whether this case is necessary or if it can be consolidated. Check for duplicate cases related to `ArchimedeanVendorManifest`: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Identify all switch cases for ArchimedeanVendorManifest. # Expected: Only one case should exist unless distinctions are necessary. rg --type ts 'ArchimedeanVendorManifest' -A 2 src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts ``` --- `29-35`: **Ensure correctness of manifest references in Ostron vendor cases** Due to the incorrect imports previously mentioned, the `res.json()` calls for the Ostron Prospector and Pet vendors might return the wrong data. After correcting the imports, verify that the correct manifests are being returned in the switch cases. Run the following script to check that the switch cases use the correct manifests: </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details>

src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:26 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the import paths for Ostron manifests

The imports for OstronProspectorVendorManifest and OstronPetVendorManifest are both importing from the OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json file. This seems incorrect. Each manifest should be imported from its corresponding JSON file.

Apply this diff to correct the import paths:

 import OstronFishmongerVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json";
-import OstronProspectorVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json";
-import OstronPetVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json";
+import OstronProspectorVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json";
+import OstronPetVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json";

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

import OstronFishmongerVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json";
import OstronProspectorVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json";
import OstronPetVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json";

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Correct the import paths for Ostron manifests** The imports for `OstronProspectorVendorManifest` and `OstronPetVendorManifest` are both importing from the `OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json` file. This seems incorrect. Each manifest should be imported from its corresponding JSON file. Apply this diff to correct the import paths: ```diff import OstronFishmongerVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json"; -import OstronProspectorVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json"; -import OstronPetVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json"; +import OstronProspectorVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json"; +import OstronPetVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json"; ```  <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion import OstronFishmongerVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json"; import OstronProspectorVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json"; import OstronPetVendorManifest from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronPetVendorManifest.json"; ````` </details>

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:26 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider refactoring the switch statement for better maintainability

The switch statement has grown significantly with many cases, which could impact maintainability and readability. Consider refactoring this logic by using a mapping object to associate vendor paths with their corresponding manifests.

Here's an example of how you might refactor the switch statement:

+const vendorManifestMap: { [key: string]: any } = {
+    "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/FishmongerVendorManifest": OstronFishmongerVendorManifest,
+    "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/ProspectorVendorManifest": OstronProspectorVendorManifest,
+    "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/PetVendorManifest": OstronPetVendorManifest,
+    "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Solaris/FishmongerVendorManifest": SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest,
+    "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Solaris/ProspectorVendorManifest": SolarisProspectorVendorManifest,
+    // Include all other vendor paths and their corresponding manifests
+};

export const getVendorInfoController: RequestHandler = (req, res) => {
-    switch (req.query.vendor as string) {
-        case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/FishmongerVendorManifest":
-            res.json(OstronFishmongerVendorManifest);
-            break;
-        case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/ProspectorVendorManifest":
-            res.json(OstronProspectorVendorManifest);
-            break;
-        // ... other cases ...
-        default:
-            throw new Error(`Unknown vendor: ${req.query.vendor}`);
-    }
+    const vendorPath = req.query.vendor as string;
+    const manifest = vendorManifestMap[vendorPath];
+    if (manifest) {
+        res.json(manifest);
+    } else {
+        throw new Error(`Unknown vendor: ${vendorPath}`);
+    }
};

This refactor simplifies the controller, enhances readability, and makes it easier to add or remove vendors in the future.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider refactoring the switch statement for better maintainability** The switch statement has grown significantly with many cases, which could impact maintainability and readability. Consider refactoring this logic by using a mapping object to associate vendor paths with their corresponding manifests. Here's an example of how you might refactor the switch statement: ```diff +const vendorManifestMap: { [key: string]: any } = { + "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/FishmongerVendorManifest": OstronFishmongerVendorManifest, + "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/ProspectorVendorManifest": OstronProspectorVendorManifest, + "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/PetVendorManifest": OstronPetVendorManifest, + "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Solaris/FishmongerVendorManifest": SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest, + "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Solaris/ProspectorVendorManifest": SolarisProspectorVendorManifest, + // Include all other vendor paths and their corresponding manifests +}; export const getVendorInfoController: RequestHandler = (req, res) => { - switch (req.query.vendor as string) { - case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/FishmongerVendorManifest": - res.json(OstronFishmongerVendorManifest); - break; - case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Ostron/ProspectorVendorManifest": - res.json(OstronProspectorVendorManifest); - break; - // ... other cases ... - default: - throw new Error(`Unknown vendor: ${req.query.vendor}`); - } + const vendorPath = req.query.vendor as string; + const manifest = vendorManifestMap[vendorPath]; + if (manifest) { + res.json(manifest); + } else { + throw new Error(`Unknown vendor: ${vendorPath}`); + } }; ``` This refactor simplifies the controller, enhances readability, and makes it easier to add or remove vendors in the future. > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts

						
				@ -16,0 +96,4 @@

				            break;

				        case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Deimos/EntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest":

				            res.json(DeimosEntratiFragmentVendorProductsManifest);

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:26 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

Typographical Error in "Commisions"

Detected inconsistent usage of "HivemindCommisionsManifest" in src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts. It appears "Commisions" is a typo and should be "Commissions". Please update all relevant filenames, imports, and references accordingly.

🔗 Analysis chain

Check for consistency in vendor manifest filenames and imports

Several imports and case statements use "HivemindCommisionsManifest" with potential typos in "Commisions". Ensure that all filenames, imports, and references are consistently named and free of typographical errors.

Run the following script to identify all occurrences of "Commisions" to verify spelling:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all occurrences of "Commisions" in filenames and content.

# Expected: Confirm whether "Commisions" should be "Commissions".
fd -e json 'Commisions' --exec echo "Filename: {}"
rg 'Commisions' --type ts --globals

Length of output: 627

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Typographical Error in "Commisions"** Detected inconsistent usage of "HivemindCommisionsManifest" in `src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts`. It appears "Commisions" is a typo and should be "Commissions". Please update all relevant filenames, imports, and references accordingly. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Check for consistency in vendor manifest filenames and imports** Several imports and case statements use "HivemindCommisionsManifest" with potential typos in "Commisions". Ensure that all filenames, imports, and references are consistently named and free of typographical errors. Run the following script to identify all occurrences of "Commisions" to verify spelling: </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of "Commisions" in filenames and content. # Expected: Confirm whether "Commisions" should be "Commissions". fd -e json 'Commisions' --exec echo "Filename: {}" rg 'Commisions' --type ts --globals ``` Length of output: 627 </details>

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosFishmongerVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +94,4 @@

				        "Id": {

				          "$oid": "66fd60b20ba592c4c95e91be"

				        }

				      }

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:25 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistencies found in vendor manifest properties.

The AllowMultipurchase property is not consistently set to true across all items, with 300 instances deviating. Additionally, both Expiry and Bin properties have multiple unique values, indicating varying configurations. Please review these properties to ensure they align with the intended behavior and consider documenting their purposes for clarity.

🔗 Analysis chain

Consider optimizing redundant properties and clarify the use of certain fields.

The store items are well-structured and provide comprehensive information. However, there are a few points to consider:

AllowMultipurchase is set to true for all items. If this is always the case for this vendor, consider moving it to the VendorInfo level to reduce redundancy.
All Expiry dates are set to a far-future date. If this is a default value meaning "never expires", consider using a more explicit representation or moving it to the VendorInfo level if it applies to all items.
The use of "BIN_0" and "BIN_1" for the Bin property is not immediately clear. Please add a comment explaining the significance of these values.

To verify the consistency of these properties across other vendor manifests, please run the following script:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of AllowMultipurchase, Expiry, and Bin properties across vendor manifests

# Test: Check if AllowMultipurchase is always true
echo "Checking AllowMultipurchase:"
rg '"AllowMultipurchase":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c

# Test: Check for unique Expiry values
echo "Checking unique Expiry values:"
rg '"Expiry":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c

# Test: Check for unique Bin values
echo "Checking unique Bin values:"
rg '"Bin":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c

Length of output: 2527

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of AllowMultipurchase, Expiry, and Bin properties across vendor manifests

# Test: Check if AllowMultipurchase is always true
echo "Checking AllowMultipurchase consistency:"
rg '"AllowMultipurchase"\s*:' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | grep -v '"AllowMultipurchase": true' | wc -l

# Test: Check for unique Expiry values
echo "Checking unique Expiry values:"
rg '"Expiry"\s*:' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c

# Test: Check for unique Bin values
echo "Checking unique Bin values:"
rg '"Bin"\s*:' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c

Length of output: 1023

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Inconsistencies found in vendor manifest properties.** The `AllowMultipurchase` property is not consistently set to `true` across all items, with 300 instances deviating. Additionally, both `Expiry` and `Bin` properties have multiple unique values, indicating varying configurations. Please review these properties to ensure they align with the intended behavior and consider documenting their purposes for clarity. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Consider optimizing redundant properties and clarify the use of certain fields.** The store items are well-structured and provide comprehensive information. However, there are a few points to consider: 1. `AllowMultipurchase` is set to `true` for all items. If this is always the case for this vendor, consider moving it to the `VendorInfo` level to reduce redundancy. 2. All `Expiry` dates are set to a far-future date. If this is a default value meaning "never expires", consider using a more explicit representation or moving it to the `VendorInfo` level if it applies to all items. 3. The use of "BIN_0" and "BIN_1" for the `Bin` property is not immediately clear. Please add a comment explaining the significance of these values. To verify the consistency of these properties across other vendor manifests, please run the following script: </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of AllowMultipurchase, Expiry, and Bin properties across vendor manifests # Test: Check if AllowMultipurchase is always true echo "Checking AllowMultipurchase:" rg '"AllowMultipurchase":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c # Test: Check for unique Expiry values echo "Checking unique Expiry values:" rg '"Expiry":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c # Test: Check for unique Bin values echo "Checking unique Bin values:" rg '"Bin":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c ``` Length of output: 2527 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of AllowMultipurchase, Expiry, and Bin properties across vendor manifests # Test: Check if AllowMultipurchase is always true echo "Checking AllowMultipurchase consistency:" rg '"AllowMultipurchase"\s*:' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | grep -v '"AllowMultipurchase": true' | wc -l # Test: Check for unique Expiry values echo "Checking unique Expiry values:" rg '"Expiry"\s*:' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c # Test: Check for unique Bin values echo "Checking unique Bin values:" rg '"Bin"\s*:' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ --json | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | sort | uniq -c ``` Length of output: 1023 </details>

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json

						
				@ -0,0 +299,4 @@

				        "Id": {

				          "$oid": "66fd60b20ba592c4c95e8f03"

				        }

				      }

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:26 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

Duplicate StoreItem and Bin Combinations Found

The ItemManifest contains 3 instances where the combination of StoreItem and Bin is not unique. This duplication may cause conflicts or unexpected behavior in the vendor system's dynamic pricing and availability mechanisms.

Ensure that each StoreItem is uniquely associated with a single Bin to maintain data integrity.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Clarify the purpose of repeated StoreItem values.

The content of the ItemManifest array provides a diverse range of items with varying prices and bins, which allows for a flexible and dynamic vendor system.

Could you please clarify the purpose of having multiple entries with the same StoreItem value but different Bin values and ItemPrices? This structure suggests a dynamic pricing or availability system, but it would be helpful to understand the specific use case. For example, how are these different entries for the same StoreItem used in the application?

To verify the uniqueness of combinations, you can run the following script:

This script will return the number of non-unique combinations of StoreItem and Bin. If the result is 0, all combinations are unique.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for unique combinations of StoreItem and Bin

jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest | group_by(.StoreItem + .Bin) | map(select(length > 1)) | length' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json

Length of output: 183

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Duplicate `StoreItem` and `Bin` Combinations Found** The `ItemManifest` contains 3 instances where the combination of `StoreItem` and `Bin` is not unique. This duplication may cause conflicts or unexpected behavior in the vendor system's dynamic pricing and availability mechanisms. - Ensure that each `StoreItem` is uniquely associated with a single `Bin` to maintain data integrity. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **LGTM! Clarify the purpose of repeated `StoreItem` values.** The content of the `ItemManifest` array provides a diverse range of items with varying prices and bins, which allows for a flexible and dynamic vendor system. Could you please clarify the purpose of having multiple entries with the same `StoreItem` value but different `Bin` values and `ItemPrices`? This structure suggests a dynamic pricing or availability system, but it would be helpful to understand the specific use case. For example, how are these different entries for the same `StoreItem` used in the application? To verify the uniqueness of combinations, you can run the following script: This script will return the number of non-unique combinations of `StoreItem` and `Bin`. If the result is 0, all combinations are unique. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unique combinations of StoreItem and Bin jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest | group_by(.StoreItem + .Bin) | map(select(length > 1)) | length' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json ``` Length of output: 183 </details>

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +318,4 @@

				      }

				    }

				  }

				}

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:26 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

Duplicate "Kuva" Entry Detected in DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json

The DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json contains two entries for the "Kuva" item, whereas other vendor manifests have at most one or none. This duplication appears to be unintended and may require correction to maintain consistency across all vendor manifests.

Action Required: Remove the redundant "Kuva" entry from DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json unless there's a documented reason for having duplicates.

This adjustment will ensure uniformity and prevent potential issues related to item pricing or availability.

🔗 Analysis chain

Overall LGTM: Acrithis vendor manifest addresses PR objectives with minor verification needed.

This new JSON file successfully provides the missing Acrithis vendor manifest, directly addressing the issue #562 mentioned in the PR objectives. The structure is consistent and well-formed, offering a diverse range of items with appropriate pricing and purchase rules.

However, there's one point that requires verification:

There appears to be a duplicate entry for the "Kuva" item. Please confirm if this is intentional or if one of the entries should be modified or removed.

Once this point is addressed, the file will fully meet the requirements for the Acrithis vendor manifest.

To assist in verifying the duplicate Kuva entry, you can run the following command to check if this pattern exists in other vendor manifests:

This script will output the count of Kuva entries for each vendor manifest. If other manifests also have multiple Kuva entries, it might indicate that this is an intentional design choice.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for duplicate Kuva entries across all vendor manifests
for file in static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json; do
  echo "Checking $file:"
  jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.StoreItem == "/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva")' "$file" | jq -s 'length'
done

Length of output: 10535

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Duplicate "Kuva" Entry Detected in DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json** The `DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json` contains two entries for the "Kuva" item, whereas other vendor manifests have at most one or none. This duplication appears to be unintended and may require correction to maintain consistency across all vendor manifests. - **Action Required:** Remove the redundant "Kuva" entry from `DuviriAcrithisVendorManifest.json` unless there's a documented reason for having duplicates. This adjustment will ensure uniformity and prevent potential issues related to item pricing or availability. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Overall LGTM: Acrithis vendor manifest addresses PR objectives with minor verification needed.** This new JSON file successfully provides the missing Acrithis vendor manifest, directly addressing the issue #562 mentioned in the PR objectives. The structure is consistent and well-formed, offering a diverse range of items with appropriate pricing and purchase rules. However, there's one point that requires verification: 1. There appears to be a duplicate entry for the "Kuva" item. Please confirm if this is intentional or if one of the entries should be modified or removed. Once this point is addressed, the file will fully meet the requirements for the Acrithis vendor manifest. To assist in verifying the duplicate Kuva entry, you can run the following command to check if this pattern exists in other vendor manifests: This script will output the count of Kuva entries for each vendor manifest. If other manifests also have multiple Kuva entries, it might indicate that this is an intentional design choice. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Check for duplicate Kuva entries across all vendor manifests for file in static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json; do echo "Checking $file:" jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.StoreItem == "/Lotus/StoreItems/Types/Items/MiscItems/Kuva")' "$file" | jq -s 'length' done ``` Length of output: 10535 </details>

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +231,4 @@

				        "Id": {

				          "$oid": "670daf92d21f34757a5e73e2"

				        }

				      }

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:26 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Address inconsistency in pricing structure across items.

There's an inconsistency in how prices are specified across different items in the manifest:

Some items (e.g., Steel Meridian, New Loka) use both ItemPrices and RegularPrice.
Others (e.g., Perrin, New Loka version two) only use RegularPrice.

This inconsistency could lead to confusion or potential bugs in the pricing logic. Consider standardizing the pricing structure across all items or documenting the reason for the differences.

Currency usage for different syndicate items has been verified.

Different syndicate items use various currencies:

IsosRailjackItem
AsteriteRailjackItem
CubicsRailjackItem

The usage of multiple currencies appears intentional and aligns with the game's economy design, supporting balanced and diverse syndicate interactions.

🔗 Analysis chain

Address inconsistency in pricing structure across items.

There's an inconsistency in how prices are specified across different items in the manifest:

Some items (e.g., Steel Meridian, New Loka) use both ItemPrices and RegularPrice.
Others (e.g., Perrin, New Loka version two) only use RegularPrice.

This inconsistency could lead to confusion or potential bugs in the pricing logic. Consider standardizing the pricing structure across all items or documenting the reason for the differences.

Verify the currency usage for different syndicate items.

Different syndicate items use various currencies:

IsosRailjackItem
AsteriteRailjackItem
CubicsRailjackItem

While this diversity can be good for game balance, please verify that the currency assignments are intentional and align with the game's economy design.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify currency usage across different syndicate items

echo "Currency usage for different syndicates:"
grep -n "ItemType.*RailjackItem" static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json

Length of output: 720

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ _:warning: Potential issue_ **Address inconsistency in pricing structure across items.** There's an inconsistency in how prices are specified across different items in the manifest: - Some items (e.g., Steel Meridian, New Loka) use both `ItemPrices` and `RegularPrice`. - Others (e.g., Perrin, New Loka version two) only use `RegularPrice`. This inconsistency could lead to confusion or potential bugs in the pricing logic. Consider standardizing the pricing structure across all items or documenting the reason for the differences. **Currency usage for different syndicate items has been verified.** Different syndicate items use various currencies: - IsosRailjackItem - AsteriteRailjackItem - CubicsRailjackItem The usage of multiple currencies appears intentional and aligns with the game's economy design, supporting balanced and diverse syndicate interactions. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Address inconsistency in pricing structure across items.** There's an inconsistency in how prices are specified across different items in the manifest: - Some items (e.g., Steel Meridian, New Loka) use both `ItemPrices` and `RegularPrice`. - Others (e.g., Perrin, New Loka version two) only use `RegularPrice`. This inconsistency could lead to confusion or potential bugs in the pricing logic. Consider standardizing the pricing structure across all items or documenting the reason for the differences. **Verify the currency usage for different syndicate items.** Different syndicate items use various currencies: - IsosRailjackItem - AsteriteRailjackItem - CubicsRailjackItem While this diversity can be good for game balance, please verify that the currency assignments are intentional and align with the game's economy design. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify currency usage across different syndicate items echo "Currency usage for different syndicates:" grep -n "ItemType.*RailjackItem" static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsRailjackCrewMemberVendorManifest.json ``` Length of output: 720 </details>

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +14,4 @@

				          "$date": {

				            "$numberLong": "9999999000000"

				          }

				        },

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:25 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Reconsider the expiry strategy for individual items

Similar to the main VendorInfo object, each item in the ItemManifest has an Expiry field set to a very distant future date. This approach might lead to maintenance issues in the long run.

Consider implementing one of these alternatives:

Remove the Expiry field from individual items if it's always the same as the main VendorInfo object's expiry.
Implement a more dynamic expiry system that allows for easier updates and maintenance.
Use null or a specific flag to indicate "never expires" instead of an extremely far future date.

Example implementation for option 3:

"Expiry": null

Where null could be interpreted as "never expires" in your application logic.

Also applies to: 28-32, 43-47, 58-62, 73-77, 88-92

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Reconsider the expiry strategy for individual items** Similar to the main `VendorInfo` object, each item in the `ItemManifest` has an `Expiry` field set to a very distant future date. This approach might lead to maintenance issues in the long run. Consider implementing one of these alternatives: 1. Remove the `Expiry` field from individual items if it's always the same as the main `VendorInfo` object's expiry. 2. Implement a more dynamic expiry system that allows for easier updates and maintenance. 3. Use `null` or a specific flag to indicate "never expires" instead of an extremely far future date. Example implementation for option 3: ```json "Expiry": null ``` Where `null` could be interpreted as "never expires" in your application logic. Also applies to: 28-32, 43-47, 58-62, 73-77, 88-92

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +101,4 @@

				      "$date": {

				        "$numberLong": "9999999000000"

				      }

				    }

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:25 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adjusting the vendor expiry date

The current expiry date is set to a very distant future (9999999000000). While this effectively means "never expires", it might be more maintainable to use a more reasonable timeframe or implement a different mechanism for permanent items.

Consider one of these alternatives:

Set an expiry date 1-2 years in the future and implement a system to automatically extend it.
Use a specific flag or value to indicate "never expires" instead of an extremely far future date.

Example implementation for option 2:

"Expiry": null

Where null could be interpreted as "never expires" in your application logic.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider adjusting the vendor expiry date** The current expiry date is set to a very distant future (`9999999000000`). While this effectively means "never expires", it might be more maintainable to use a more reasonable timeframe or implement a different mechanism for permanent items. Consider one of these alternatives: 1. Set an expiry date 1-2 years in the future and implement a system to automatically extend it. 2. Use a specific flag or value to indicate "never expires" instead of an extremely far future date. Example implementation for option 2: ```json "Expiry": null ``` Where `null` could be interpreted as "never expires" in your application logic.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/OstronProspectorVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +50,4 @@

				          "$oid": "66fd60b20ba592c4c95e98f2"

				        }

				      }

				    ],

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:25 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider optimizing the PremiumPrice structure

In the ItemManifest, each item's PremiumPrice is represented as an array with two identical values (e.g., [19, 19], [8, 8], [5, 5]). This structure seems redundant. Consider simplifying it to a single value if there's no specific reason for the duplication. For example:

"PremiumPrice": 19

This change would make the data more concise and easier to maintain. If there's a particular reason for the current structure, please add a comment explaining its purpose.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider optimizing the `PremiumPrice` structure** In the `ItemManifest`, each item's `PremiumPrice` is represented as an array with two identical values (e.g., `[19, 19]`, `[8, 8]`, `[5, 5]`). This structure seems redundant. Consider simplifying it to a single value if there's no specific reason for the duplication. For example: ```json "PremiumPrice": 19 ``` This change would make the data more concise and easier to maintain. If there's a particular reason for the current structure, please add a comment explaining its purpose.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +123,4 @@

				      }

				    }

				  }

				}

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:26 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider reviewing uniform values across items.

The file structure is consistently maintained, which is excellent for readability and maintainability. However, there are some uniform values across all items that might benefit from review:

Expiry dates are set to a very high value for all items.
QuantityMultiplier is always set to 1.
AllowMultipurchase is always set to true.

While these uniform values might be intentional, consider if any of these properties should vary between items:

Different items might have different expiration policies.
Some items might benefit from quantity discounts (QuantityMultiplier > 1).
Certain rare or limited items might not allow multiple purchases.

To verify the usage of these properties across all vendor manifests, you can run:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for QuantityMultiplier and AllowMultipurchase usage
echo "QuantityMultiplier usage:"
rg -g '*.json' -i '"QuantityMultiplier":\s*(\d+)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/

echo "\nAllowMultipurchase usage:"
rg -g '*.json' -i '"AllowMultipurchase":\s*(true|false)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/

This will help you understand if these properties are used consistently across all vendors or if there's already some variation in place.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider reviewing uniform values across items.** The file structure is consistently maintained, which is excellent for readability and maintainability. However, there are some uniform values across all items that might benefit from review: 1. Expiry dates are set to a very high value for all items. 2. QuantityMultiplier is always set to 1. 3. AllowMultipurchase is always set to true. While these uniform values might be intentional, consider if any of these properties should vary between items: 1. Different items might have different expiration policies. 2. Some items might benefit from quantity discounts (QuantityMultiplier > 1). 3. Certain rare or limited items might not allow multiple purchases. To verify the usage of these properties across all vendor manifests, you can run: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for QuantityMultiplier and AllowMultipurchase usage echo "QuantityMultiplier usage:" rg -g '*.json' -i '"QuantityMultiplier":\s*(\d+)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ echo "\nAllowMultipurchase usage:" rg -g '*.json' -i '"AllowMultipurchase":\s*(true|false)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` This will help you understand if these properties are used consistently across all vendors or if there's already some variation in place.

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/SolarisFishmongerVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +94,4 @@

				        "Id": {

				          "$oid": "66fd60b20ba592c4c95e951a"

				        }

				      }

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 06:38:25 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent Bin values detected in ItemManifest.

Several items have Bin values outside the expected "BIN_0" and "BIN_1":

"BIN_2"
"BIN_3"
"BIN_5"

Please verify if these Bin assignments are intentional and ensure they align with the categorization logic for store items.

🔗 Analysis chain

Good structure, but clarify PremiumPrice and Bin usage.

The ItemManifest array is well-structured with consistent properties across all items. However, there are a few points to consider:

All items have the same far-future Expiry date. Is this intentional, or should some items have different expiration dates?
The PremiumPrice is always an array with two identical values (e.g., [15, 15], [8, 8]). Is this intentional, or should it be a single value?
The Bin values are either "BIN_0" or "BIN_1". Could you clarify the purpose of these bins and if there's a specific logic behind their assignment?

To ensure consistency across other vendor manifests, please run the following script:

This script will help identify any inconsistencies or unusual patterns across all vendor manifests.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent structure and unusual patterns in vendor manifests

# Test: Check for consistent ItemManifest structure and unusual PremiumPrice patterns
jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.PremiumPrice[0] != .PremiumPrice[1] or (.PremiumPrice | length) != 2)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json

# Test: Check for varied Expiry dates
jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.Expiry."$date"."$numberLong" != "9999999000000")' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json

# Test: Check for Bin values other than "BIN_0" or "BIN_1"
jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.Bin != "BIN_0" and .Bin != "BIN_1")' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json

Length of output: 109202

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Inconsistent Bin values detected in ItemManifest.** Several items have Bin values outside the expected "BIN_0" and "BIN_1": - "BIN_2" - "BIN_3" - "BIN_5" Please verify if these Bin assignments are intentional and ensure they align with the categorization logic for store items. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Good structure, but clarify PremiumPrice and Bin usage.** The ItemManifest array is well-structured with consistent properties across all items. However, there are a few points to consider: 1. All items have the same far-future Expiry date. Is this intentional, or should some items have different expiration dates? 2. The PremiumPrice is always an array with two identical values (e.g., [15, 15], [8, 8]). Is this intentional, or should it be a single value? 3. The Bin values are either "BIN_0" or "BIN_1". Could you clarify the purpose of these bins and if there's a specific logic behind their assignment? To ensure consistency across other vendor manifests, please run the following script: This script will help identify any inconsistencies or unusual patterns across all vendor manifests. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent structure and unusual patterns in vendor manifests # Test: Check for consistent ItemManifest structure and unusual PremiumPrice patterns jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.PremiumPrice[0] != .PremiumPrice[1] or (.PremiumPrice | length) != 2)' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json # Test: Check for varied Expiry dates jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.Expiry."$date"."$numberLong" != "9999999000000")' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json # Test: Check for Bin values other than "BIN_0" or "BIN_1" jq '.VendorInfo.ItemManifest[] | select(.Bin != "BIN_0" and .Bin != "BIN_1")' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/*.json ``` Length of output: 109202 </details>

Sainan commented

2024-10-18 08:06:52 -07:00

Palladino (/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Hubs/IronwakeDondaVendorManifest) is missing right now.

Palladino (`/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Hubs/IronwakeDondaVendorManifest`) is missing right now.

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-18 08:47:37 -07:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 008e75215c and 20a2aa2afe.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (1 hunks)
static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (6)

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json (4)
1-6: LGTM: VendorInfo structure is well-defined and consistent.

The main VendorInfo structure is correctly formatted and includes all necessary fields. The TypeName "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Hubs/IronwakeDondaVendorManifest" matches the file path, which is good for consistency. Note that the Expiry is set to a very high value, indicating that this vendor is intended to be available indefinitely.

Also applies to: 118-125

7-28: Consider adding a purchase quantity limit for the HarrowQuestKeyOrnament.

The first item in the ItemManifest, "HarrowQuestKeyOrnament", allows multiple purchases without a quantity limit. While this may be intentional, it's worth considering whether a limit should be implemented to prevent potential abuse or economic imbalance in the game.

Please confirm if the unlimited purchase of this item is intended. If not, consider adding a PurchaseQuantityLimit field similar to other items in this manifest.

1-125: Overall structure is sound, with consistent use of expiry dates.

The JSON structure for the Ironwake Donda vendor manifest is well-formed and consistent. All items in the ItemManifest, as well as the main VendorInfo object, use the same high expiry date (9999999000000), indicating that this vendor and its items are intended to be available indefinitely. This consistency is good for maintaining the vendor's long-term availability.

However, please address the issues mentioned in the previous comments:

Consider adding a purchase quantity limit for the HarrowQuestKeyOrnament.

Verify the consistent use of RivenFragment as currency for all items.

Remove the duplicate RivenModPack entry.

After addressing these points, the vendor manifest will be more robust and less prone to potential issues.

29-116: Verify the consistent use of RivenFragment as currency.

All items in the ItemManifest use "RivenFragment" (/Lotus/Types/Items/MiscItems/RivenFragment) as the currency. While this may be intentional, it's unusual to have a single specialized currency for all items. Please confirm if this is the desired behavior or if some items should use different currencies.

Run the following script to check for currency usage across all vendor manifests:

This will help verify if the use of RivenFragment as currency is consistent with other vendor manifests or if it's unique to this vendor.

✅ Verification successful

Verified the consistent use of RivenFragment as currency and absence of duplicate StoreItem entries.

All items in HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json consistently use "RivenFragment" as the currency, aligning with the currency usage patterns observed in other vendor manifests.

No duplicate StoreItem entries were found in the manifest, ensuring each item is uniquely listed.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check currency usage across all vendor manifests

# Test: Search for ItemType fields in all vendor manifest files
rg --type json -g "*VendorManifest.json" '"ItemType":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/
Length of output: 13906

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for duplicate StoreItem entries in HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json

# Extract all StoreItem values and identify duplicates
jq '.[] | .StoreItem' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json | sort | uniq -d
Length of output: 114
src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (2)

20-21: Duplicate Comment: Correct the import paths for Ostron manifests

As previously noted, the imports for OstronProspectorVendorManifest and OstronPetVendorManifest are both importing from the OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json file. Each manifest should be imported from its corresponding JSON file to ensure correct data is served.

30-129: Duplicate Comment: Consider refactoring the switch statement for better maintainability

As previously suggested, the switch statement has grown significantly, which could impact maintainability and readability. Consider refactoring this logic by using a mapping object to associate vendor paths with their corresponding manifests.

**Actionable comments posted: 3** <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 008e75215c1212d52c2bd3bb231de8ee6fa63c25 and 20a2aa2afe245dfec708ab2f43d988b42a8c4e2c. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary> * src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (1 hunks) * static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (6)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json (4)</summary><blockquote> `1-6`: **LGTM: VendorInfo structure is well-defined and consistent.** The main VendorInfo structure is correctly formatted and includes all necessary fields. The TypeName "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Hubs/IronwakeDondaVendorManifest" matches the file path, which is good for consistency. Note that the Expiry is set to a very high value, indicating that this vendor is intended to be available indefinitely. Also applies to: 118-125 --- `7-28`: **Consider adding a purchase quantity limit for the HarrowQuestKeyOrnament.** The first item in the ItemManifest, "HarrowQuestKeyOrnament", allows multiple purchases without a quantity limit. While this may be intentional, it's worth considering whether a limit should be implemented to prevent potential abuse or economic imbalance in the game. Please confirm if the unlimited purchase of this item is intended. If not, consider adding a `PurchaseQuantityLimit` field similar to other items in this manifest. --- `1-125`: **Overall structure is sound, with consistent use of expiry dates.** The JSON structure for the Ironwake Donda vendor manifest is well-formed and consistent. All items in the ItemManifest, as well as the main VendorInfo object, use the same high expiry date (9999999000000), indicating that this vendor and its items are intended to be available indefinitely. This consistency is good for maintaining the vendor's long-term availability. However, please address the issues mentioned in the previous comments: 1. Consider adding a purchase quantity limit for the HarrowQuestKeyOrnament. 2. Verify the consistent use of RivenFragment as currency for all items. 3. Remove the duplicate RivenModPack entry. After addressing these points, the vendor manifest will be more robust and less prone to potential issues. --- `29-116`: **Verify the consistent use of RivenFragment as currency.** All items in the ItemManifest use "RivenFragment" (/Lotus/Types/Items/MiscItems/RivenFragment) as the currency. While this may be intentional, it's unusual to have a single specialized currency for all items. Please confirm if this is the desired behavior or if some items should use different currencies. Run the following script to check for currency usage across all vendor manifests: This will help verify if the use of RivenFragment as currency is consistent with other vendor manifests or if it's unique to this vendor. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> **Verified the consistent use of RivenFragment as currency and absence of duplicate StoreItem entries.** - All items in `HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json` consistently use "RivenFragment" as the currency, aligning with the currency usage patterns observed in other vendor manifests. - No duplicate `StoreItem` entries were found in the manifest, ensuring each item is uniquely listed. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check currency usage across all vendor manifests # Test: Search for ItemType fields in all vendor manifest files rg --type json -g "*VendorManifest.json" '"ItemType":' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/ ``` Length of output: 13906 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for duplicate StoreItem entries in HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json # Extract all StoreItem values and identify duplicates jq '.[] | .StoreItem' static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json | sort | uniq -d ``` Length of output: 114 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `20-21`: **Duplicate Comment: Correct the import paths for Ostron manifests** As previously noted, the imports for `OstronProspectorVendorManifest` and `OstronPetVendorManifest` are both importing from the `OstronFishmongerVendorManifest.json` file. Each manifest should be imported from its corresponding JSON file to ensure correct data is served. --- `30-129`: **Duplicate Comment: Consider refactoring the switch statement for better maintainability** As previously suggested, the switch statement has grown significantly, which could impact maintainability and readability. Consider refactoring this logic by using a mapping object to associate vendor paths with their corresponding manifests. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details>

src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts

						
				@ -3,0 +6,4 @@

				import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json";

				import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json";

				import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json";

				import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json";

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 08:47:36 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the spelling of 'Commisions' to 'Commissions' in import statements

The word 'Commisions' is misspelled in the import statements on lines 5 to 9. It should be 'Commissions'. Correcting the spelling will ensure consistency and prevent potential import errors.

Apply this diff to correct the spelling:

-import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger.json";
+import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestFishmonger from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestFishmonger.json";
-import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json";
+import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestPetVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestPetVendor.json";
-import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json";
+import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestProspector from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestProspector.json";
-import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json";
+import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestTokenVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestTokenVendor.json";
-import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json";
+import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith.json";

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Correct the spelling of 'Commisions' to 'Commissions' in import statements** The word 'Commisions' is misspelled in the import statements on lines 5 to 9. It should be 'Commissions'. Correcting the spelling will ensure consistency and prevent potential import errors. Apply this diff to correct the spelling: ```diff -import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestFishmonger.json"; +import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestFishmonger from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestFishmonger.json"; -import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestPetVendor.json"; +import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestPetVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestPetVendor.json"; -import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestProspector.json"; +import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestProspector from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestProspector.json"; -import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestTokenVendor.json"; +import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestTokenVendor from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestTokenVendor.json"; -import DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommisionsManifestWeaponsmith.json"; +import DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith from "@/static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/DeimosHivemindCommissionsManifestWeaponsmith.json"; ``` > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

src/controllers/api/getVendorInfoController.ts

						
				@ -16,0 +56,4 @@

				            break;

				        case "/Lotus/Types/Game/VendorManifests/Solaris/DebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest":

				            res.json(SolarisDebtTokenVendorRepossessionsManifest);

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 08:47:36 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Missing Vendor Manifest for 'Ticker'

According to issue #560, the vendor 'Ticker' does not have a vendor manifest included in the controller. It appears that 'Ticker' is still missing from the getVendorInfoController. To fully resolve the linked issue, please include the 'Ticker' vendor manifest.

Would you like assistance in adding the 'Ticker' vendor manifest to the controller?

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Missing Vendor Manifest for 'Ticker'** According to issue #560, the vendor 'Ticker' does not have a vendor manifest included in the controller. It appears that 'Ticker' is still missing from the `getVendorInfoController`. To fully resolve the linked issue, please include the 'Ticker' vendor manifest. Would you like assistance in adding the 'Ticker' vendor manifest to the controller?

static/fixed_responses/getVendorInfo/HubsIronwakeDondaVendorManifest.json

						
				@ -0,0 +47,4 @@

				        "Id": {

				          "$oid": "66fd60b20ba592c4c95e9468"

				        }

				      },

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-18 08:47:36 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicate RivenModPack entry.

There are two identical entries for the RivenModPack item in the ItemManifest. This appears to be a duplication error. Please remove one of these entries to avoid confusion and potential issues with the vendor's inventory.

To fix this, remove one of the RivenModPack entries (lines 29-50 or lines 96-116).

Also applies to: 96-116

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Remove duplicate RivenModPack entry.** There are two identical entries for the RivenModPack item in the ItemManifest. This appears to be a duplication error. Please remove one of these entries to avoid confusion and potential issues with the vendor's inventory. To fix this, remove one of the RivenModPack entries (lines 29-50 or lines 96-116). Also applies to: 96-116

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#565