chore: fix inconsistent formatting (npm run prettier) #543

Sainan · 2024-10-11T16:37:46-07:00

Sainan commented

2024-10-11 16:37:46 -07:00

No description provided.

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-10-11 16:37:52 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to several configuration files primarily focused on correcting YAML formatting and enhancing readability. In the .coderabbit.yaml file, adjustments were made to the indentation of the auto_review and chat sections, ensuring that the enabled and drafts keys under auto_review, as well as the auto_reply key under chat, are properly aligned. The .github/workflows/build.yml file received a newline addition at the end to address a formatting issue, and the linting command was updated for better recognition. The .github/workflows/docker.yml file had its indentation adjusted for improved readability, particularly in the branches list and parameters related to the container registry login and build steps. Lastly, the docker-compose.yml file saw similar indentation adjustments for the openwf and mongodb service definitions, maintaining consistency throughout. Overall, these changes are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality or configuration of the services.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CI/CD
    participant Docker
    participant YAML

    User->>CI/CD: Trigger build
    CI/CD->>YAML: Read configuration
    YAML->>CI/CD: Return formatted YAML
    CI/CD->>Docker: Build and push images
    Docker->>CI/CD: Confirm build success
    CI/CD->>User: Notify build completion

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de6c1da55d and 5088955c64.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

.coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
.github/workflows/docker.yml (2 hunks)
docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)

.coderabbit.yaml
.github/workflows/build.yml
.github/workflows/docker.yml
docker-compose.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The changes in this pull request involve modifications to several configuration files primarily focused on correcting YAML formatting and enhancing readability. In the `.coderabbit.yaml` file, adjustments were made to the indentation of the `auto_review` and `chat` sections, ensuring that the `enabled` and `drafts` keys under `auto_review`, as well as the `auto_reply` key under `chat`, are properly aligned. The `.github/workflows/build.yml` file received a newline addition at the end to address a formatting issue, and the linting command was updated for better recognition. The `.github/workflows/docker.yml` file had its indentation adjusted for improved readability, particularly in the `branches` list and parameters related to the container registry login and build steps. Lastly, the `docker-compose.yml` file saw similar indentation adjustments for the `openwf` and `mongodb` service definitions, maintaining consistency throughout. Overall, these changes are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality or configuration of the services. ## Sequence Diagram(s) ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant User participant CI/CD participant Docker participant YAML User->>CI/CD: Trigger build CI/CD->>YAML: Read configuration YAML->>CI/CD: Return formatted YAML CI/CD->>Docker: Build and push images Docker->>CI/CD: Confirm build success CI/CD->>User: Notify build completion ```      --- <details> <summary>📜 Recent review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de6c1da55d9679014473fc95c5a020f5df1c7315 and 5088955c6464566226664b25cdd372a2b191d8cd. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (4)</summary> * .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks) * .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks) * .github/workflows/docker.yml (2 hunks) * docker-compose.yml (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)</summary> * .coderabbit.yaml * .github/workflows/build.yml * .github/workflows/docker.yml * docker-compose.yml </details> </details>   --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#543