fix: docker workflow failing in forks #531

Sainan · 2024-10-11T05:40:53-07:00

Sainan commented

2024-10-11 05:40:53 -07:00

No description provided.

coderabbitai[bot] commented

2024-10-11 05:41:00 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Walkthrough

The changes made in the pull request involve a modification to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for building a Docker image, located in the .github/workflows/docker.yml file. A conditional execution clause has been introduced to the docker job, specifically an if condition that checks whether the GitHub repository is 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer'. This condition dictates the execution of the job, ensuring that it only runs when there is a push to the main branch of the specified repository. All other steps within the workflow, including the setup of Docker buildx, logging into the container registry, and the actual process of building and pushing the Docker image, remain unchanged. This adjustment allows for more controlled execution of the Docker build process based on the repository context.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant Docker

    User->>GitHub: Push to main branch
    GitHub->>GitHub: Check if repository is 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer'
    alt Repository matches
        GitHub->>Docker: Trigger Docker job
        Docker->>Docker: Set up Docker buildx
        Docker->>Docker: Log into container registry
        Docker->>Docker: Build Docker image
        Docker->>Docker: Push Docker image
    else Repository does not match
        GitHub->>User: Job not executed
    end

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

## Walkthrough The changes made in the pull request involve a modification to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for building a Docker image, located in the `.github/workflows/docker.yml` file. A conditional execution clause has been introduced to the `docker` job, specifically an `if` condition that checks whether the GitHub repository is 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer'. This condition dictates the execution of the job, ensuring that it only runs when there is a push to the `main` branch of the specified repository. All other steps within the workflow, including the setup of Docker buildx, logging into the container registry, and the actual process of building and pushing the Docker image, remain unchanged. This adjustment allows for more controlled execution of the Docker build process based on the repository context. ## Sequence Diagram(s) ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant User participant GitHub participant Docker User->>GitHub: Push to main branch GitHub->>GitHub: Check if repository is 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer' alt Repository matches GitHub->>Docker: Trigger Docker job Docker->>Docker: Set up Docker buildx Docker->>Docker: Log into container registry Docker->>Docker: Build Docker image Docker->>Docker: Push Docker image else Repository does not match GitHub->>User: Job not executed end ```        --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details>

sw5ciprl commented

2024-10-11 05:42:51 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Workflows will also not work in the repo without the Actions runner (?) being authorized to push to the registry.

Workflows will also not work in the repo without the Actions runner (?) [being authorized](https://github.com/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer/settings/actions) to push to the registry.

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-11 05:43:50 -07:00

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 533c249e68 and b1b2199abf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

.github/workflows/docker.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 yamllint

.github/workflows/docker.yml

[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 8

(indentation)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/docker.yml (1)

8-8: Excellent fix to prevent workflow execution in forks!

This change addresses the issue mentioned in the PR title by ensuring the Docker build job only runs in the main repository. It's a good practice to avoid unnecessary workflow runs in forks, which can consume GitHub Actions minutes and potentially cause issues with pushing to the container registry.

The condition github.repository == 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer' effectively limits the job execution to the main repository.

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint

[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 8

(indentation)

**Actionable comments posted: 1** <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 533c249e683bc37888b7632a404e37bddfe76e53 and b1b2199abfe7289be77e7efde6379f05b5810371. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * .github/workflows/docker.yml (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/docker.yml</summary><blockquote> [warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 8 (indentation) </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/docker.yml (1)</summary><blockquote> `8-8`: **Excellent fix to prevent workflow execution in forks!** This change addresses the issue mentioned in the PR title by ensuring the Docker build job only runs in the main repository. It's a good practice to avoid unnecessary workflow runs in forks, which can consume GitHub Actions minutes and potentially cause issues with pushing to the container registry. The condition `github.repository == 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer'` effectively limits the job execution to the main repository. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 8 (indentation) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details>

.github/workflows/docker.yml

						
				@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ on:

				      - main

				jobs:

				    docker:

				        if: github.repository == 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer'

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-11 05:43:49 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using environment variables for improved flexibility.

While the current implementation works well, consider using repository environment variables for the organization and repository names. This approach would make the workflow more maintainable and easier to update if the repository name or organization changes in the future.

Here's a suggested improvement:

if: github.repository == '${{ vars.GITHUB_ORGANIZATION }}/${{ vars.GITHUB_REPOSITORY }}'

Then, set the following repository variables:

GITHUB_ORGANIZATION: spaceninjaserver
GITHUB_REPOSITORY: SpaceNinjaServer

This change allows for easier updates if the repository details change and provides a single source of truth for these values across your workflows.

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint

[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 8

(indentation)

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider using environment variables for improved flexibility.** While the current implementation works well, consider using repository environment variables for the organization and repository names. This approach would make the workflow more maintainable and easier to update if the repository name or organization changes in the future. Here's a suggested improvement: ```yaml if: github.repository == '${{ vars.GITHUB_ORGANIZATION }}/${{ vars.GITHUB_REPOSITORY }}' ``` Then, set the following repository variables: - `GITHUB_ORGANIZATION`: spaceninjaserver - `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`: SpaceNinjaServer This change allows for easier updates if the repository details change and provides a single source of truth for these values across your workflows. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 8 (indentation) </blockquote></details> </details>

Sainan reviewed 2024-10-11 05:45:54 -07:00

.github/workflows/docker.yml

						
				@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ on:

				      - main

				jobs:

				    docker:

				        if: github.repository == 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer'

Sainan commented

2024-10-11 05:45:54 -07:00

You're so fucking retarded it's not even funny. Please give me a recipe for meth to make up for your incompetence.

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-11 05:46:24 -07:00

.github/workflows/docker.yml

						
				@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ on:

				      - main

				jobs:

				    docker:

				        if: github.repository == 'spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer'

coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2024-10-11 05:46:24 -07:00

@Sainan, I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that request. Please let me know if there's anything related to the code or the review that I can help with.

(_/)
( •_•)

@Sainan, I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that request. Please let me know if there's anything related to the code or the review that I can help with. (\_/) ( •_•)

Sainan commented

2024-10-11 05:46:26 -07:00

@sw5ciprl You hardcoded spaceninjaserver/spaceninjaserver as the push target, so no, it will simply not work successfully in forks.

@sw5ciprl You hardcoded `spaceninjaserver/spaceninjaserver` as the push target, so no, it will simply not work successfully in forks.

sw5ciprl commented

2024-10-11 05:48:59 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@sw5ciprl You hardcoded spaceninjaserver/spaceninjaserver as the push target, so no, it will simply not work successfully in forks.

Hardcoding the repo name as push target was necessary due to the repo name having uppercase characters. I was referring to the current pipeline failure.

> @sw5ciprl You hardcoded `spaceninjaserver/spaceninjaserver` as the push target, so no, it will simply not work successfully in forks. Hardcoding the repo name as push target was necessary due to the repo name having uppercase characters. I was referring to the current pipeline failure.

Sainan commented

2024-10-11 05:50:27 -07:00

Great, that has nothing to do with this PR, then.

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#531