feat: create Docker image, set up Docker CI #528

Merged
sw5ciprl merged 8 commits from main into main 2024-10-10 13:07:37 -07:00
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-09 10:24:19 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Rough setup. Current issues:

  • Entrypoint script uses dirty sed scripting to turn environment variables into config.json entries.
Rough setup. Current issues: - Entrypoint script uses dirty sed scripting to turn environment variables into config.json entries.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-09 10:25:59 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Note

Reviews paused

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new job in the GitHub Actions workflow for Docker setup, transitioning the application from a MongoDB-based Docker image to a Node.js-based image in the Dockerfile. The docker-compose.yml file is updated to remove the old MongoDB service and add a new service for the application, named openwf, which connects to a simplified MongoDB service. Additionally, a new entrypoint script is created to handle the container's initialization and configuration. A .dockerignore file is also added to specify files and directories to be ignored during the Docker build process. The .gitignore file is updated to include new paths, and an example environment variable file is removed.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml Added a new job docker for Docker setup, including steps for setting up Docker buildx, logging into the container registry, and building/pushing Docker images.
Dockerfile Changed base image from MongoDB to Node.js, removed EXPOSE 27017, added multiple environment variables for application configuration, and set entry point to a new script instead of MongoDB server.
docker-compose.yml Removed mongodb service, added openwf service with a new image from the GitHub container registry, and simplified the mongodb service configuration with a specific image version and environment variables.
docker-entrypoint.sh Introduced a new script for container initialization that creates a config.json file, processes environment variables, updates the JSON configuration, checks for a specific file, and executes npm commands with arguments.
.dockerignore Added a new file to specify patterns for files and directories to be ignored during the Docker build process.
.gitignore Updated to include new entries for ignoring /data and modified entry for /database_scripts.
.env.example Removed file containing environment variable settings for database configuration.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: review paused by coderabbit.ai --> > [!NOTE] > ## Reviews paused > > Use the following commands to manage reviews: > - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume automatic reviews. > - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a single review. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: review paused by coderabbit.ai --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- walkthrough_start --> ## Walkthrough The changes introduce a new job in the GitHub Actions workflow for Docker setup, transitioning the application from a MongoDB-based Docker image to a Node.js-based image in the Dockerfile. The `docker-compose.yml` file is updated to remove the old MongoDB service and add a new service for the application, named `openwf`, which connects to a simplified MongoDB service. Additionally, a new entrypoint script is created to handle the container's initialization and configuration. A `.dockerignore` file is also added to specify files and directories to be ignored during the Docker build process. The `.gitignore` file is updated to include new paths, and an example environment variable file is removed. ## Changes | File | Change Summary | |----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | .github/workflows/build.yml | Added a new job `docker` for Docker setup, including steps for setting up Docker buildx, logging into the container registry, and building/pushing Docker images. | | Dockerfile | Changed base image from MongoDB to Node.js, removed `EXPOSE 27017`, added multiple environment variables for application configuration, and set entry point to a new script instead of MongoDB server. | | docker-compose.yml | Removed `mongodb` service, added `openwf` service with a new image from the GitHub container registry, and simplified the `mongodb` service configuration with a specific image version and environment variables. | | docker-entrypoint.sh | Introduced a new script for container initialization that creates a `config.json` file, processes environment variables, updates the JSON configuration, checks for a specific file, and executes npm commands with arguments. | | .dockerignore | Added a new file to specify patterns for files and directories to be ignored during the Docker build process. | | .gitignore | Updated to include new entries for ignoring `/data` and modified entry for `/database_scripts`. | | .env.example | Removed file containing environment variable settings for database configuration. | <!-- walkthrough_end --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- ``` .github/workflows/build.yml: """ ## AI-generated summary of changes The diff introduces a new job named `docker` to the GitHub Actions workflow defined in `.github/workflows/build.yml`. This job runs on the `ubuntu-latest` environment and is conditioned to execute only on pushes to the `main` branch. The `docker` job includes several steps for setting up Docker, which are as follows: 1. **Set up Docker buildx**: This step utilizes the `docker/setup-buildx-action@v3` action to configure Docker buildx. 2. **Log in to container registry**: This step uses the `docker/login-action@v3` to authenticate to the GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io) using the GitHub actor's username and a secret token. 3. **Build and push**: This step employs the `docker/build-push-action@v6` to build and push Docker images, specifying the target platforms as `linux/amd64` and `linux/arm64`, enabling the push option, and setting the image tags based on the repository name and the current Git commit SHA. The existing `build` job remains unchanged, maintaining its steps for checking out the code, setting up the Node.js environment, and running build and lint commands. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - New job added: `docker` in `.github/workflows/build.yml` """ --- Dockerfile: """ ## AI-generated summary of changes The `Dockerfile` has undergone a substantial transformation, shifting from a MongoDB-based configuration to a Node.js environment. The base image has been changed from `mongo as base` to `node:18-alpine3.19`. The `EXPOSE` directive for port 27017 has been removed, indicating the elimination of MongoDB's default port exposure. New instructions have been added to install essential packages (`bash`, `sed`, `wget`, `jq`) and to copy the current directory into the `/app` directory within the container. The working directory is now set to `/app`. A series of environment variables have been introduced to configure application settings, including database connection details and various feature toggles. These variables include `APP_MONGODB_URL`, `APP_MY_ADDRESS`, `APP_HTTP_PORT`, `APP_HTTPS_PORT`, and several others that dictate application behavior. The entry point for the container has been updated to execute a script located at `/app/docker-entrypoint.sh`, replacing the previous command that started the MongoDB server. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Base image changed: `FROM mongo as base` in `Dockerfile` → `FROM node:18-alpine3.19` in `Dockerfile` - Exposed port removed: `EXPOSE 27017` in `Dockerfile` - New environment variables added in `Dockerfile`: - `ENV APP_MONGODB_URL=mongodb://mongodb:27017/openWF` - `ENV APP_MY_ADDRESS=localhost` - `ENV APP_HTTP_PORT=80` - `ENV APP_HTTPS_PORT=443` - `ENV APP_AUTO_CREATE_ACCOUNT=true` - `ENV APP_SKIP_STORY_MODE_CHOICE=true` - `ENV APP_SKIP_TUTORIAL=true` - `ENV APP_SKIP_ALL_DIALOGUE=true` - `ENV APP_UNLOCK_ALL_SCANS=true` - `ENV APP_UNLOCK_ALL_MISSIONS=true` - `ENV APP_UNLOCK_ALL_QUESTS=true` - `ENV APP_COMPLETE_ALL_QUESTS=true` - `ENV APP_INFINITE_RESOURCES=true` - `ENV APP_UNLOCK_ALL_SHIP_FEATURES=true` - `ENV APP_UNLOCK_ALL_SHIP_DECORATIONS=true` - `ENV APP_UNLOCK_ALL_FLAVOUR_ITEMS=true` - `ENV APP_UNLOCK_ALL_SKINS=true` - `ENV APP_UNIVERSAL_POLARITY_EVERYWHERE=true` - `ENV APP_SPOOF_MASTERY_RANK=-1` - New packages installed: `RUN apk add --no-cache bash sed wget jq` in `Dockerfile` - Files copied: `COPY . /app` in `Dockerfile` - Working directory set: `WORKDIR /app` in `Dockerfile` - Entry point set: `CMD ["mongod"]` in `Dockerfile` → `ENTRYPOINT ["/app/docker-entrypoint.sh"]` in `Dockerfile` """ --- docker-compose.yml: """ ## AI-generated summary of changes The `docker-compose.yml` file has undergone significant modifications, primarily involving the removal of the existing `mongodb` service configuration and the introduction of a new service named `openwf`. The previous `mongodb` service, which included detailed settings such as container name, image, restart policy, build context, environment variables, ports, and network configuration, has been completely eliminated. In its place, the `openwf` service has been added, specifying an image from a GitHub container registry. This service includes an environment variable for the MongoDB connection URL, which points to the newly defined `mongodb` service. The new `mongodb` service has been simplified, using a specific image version and setting the root username and password directly in the environment variables. The `openwf` service also exposes ports 80 and 443, which were not part of the original `mongodb` service configuration. Additionally, several comments have been included in the `openwf` service to indicate default values for various environment variables, which can be uncommented for customization. The `volumes` section has been added to both services, linking local directories to paths within the containers. Overall, the changes reflect a restructuring of the services, emphasizing the `openwf` service and streamlining the configuration for the `mongodb` service. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Service added: `openwf` with image `ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest` in `docker-compose.yml` - Service modified: `mongodb` with image `docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble` in `docker-compose.yml` """ --- docker-entrypoint.sh: """ ## AI-generated summary of changes The `docker-entrypoint.sh` script has been introduced to facilitate the initialization of a Docker container. It begins by setting the script to exit immediately if any command fails. The script creates a `config.json` file, which is populated with a logger configuration that includes file logging and a trace level, along with a list of valid logging levels. The script iterates over environment variables that start with `APP_`. For each variable, it processes the variable name by removing the `APP_` prefix, converting it to lowercase, and transforming underscores into camel case. The corresponding value is extracted from the environment variable. The script uses `jq` to update the `config.json` file by adding the extracted values under their respective keys. This is done by creating a temporary file, `config.tmp`, which is then renamed to `config.json`. Before executing the npm command, the script checks for the existence of a `buildConfig.json` file in the `/app/static/data/` directory. If the file is not found, the script outputs an error message and exits with a status of 1. If the file exists, the script proceeds to execute `npm install` followed by `npm run dev`. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - No alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities were made. """ --- .dockerignore: """ ## AI-generated summary of changes The changes introduce a new `.dockerignore` file that specifies patterns for files and directories to be ignored by Docker during the build process. The patterns included are `**/.dockerignore`, `**/.git`, `Dockerfile*`, `.*`, and `data/`, which collectively instruct Docker to exclude any `.dockerignore` files, any `.git` directories, any files starting with `Dockerfile`, any hidden files (those starting with a dot), and the `data/` directory from the build context. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - New file added: `.dockerignore` in the root directory. """ --- .gitignore: """ ## AI-generated summary of changes The diff updates the `.gitignore` file by adding new entries and modifying existing ones. It introduces the following new paths to be ignored: `/data`. The entry for `/database_scripts` has been adjusted to include a newline at the end of the file. The existing entries for `/node_modules`, `/build`, `/.env`, `/config.json`, `/static/data/**`, `yarn.lock`, `/tmp`, `.idea/`, and `/logs` remain unchanged. The entry for `/static/data/.gitkeep` is preserved, ensuring that this specific file is not ignored. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - New entry added to `.gitignore`: `/data` - Entry modified in `.gitignore`: `/database_scripts` (newline added) """ --- .env.example: """ ## AI-generated summary of changes The deleted file `.env.example` contained environment variable settings intended for Docker configuration. Specifically, it included the following variables: `DATABASE_PORT`, set to `27017`, `DATABASE_USERNAME`, set to `root`, and `DATABASE_PASSWORD`, set to `database`. These variables were likely used to configure database connection parameters for applications running in a Docker environment. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Environment variable settings removed: - `DATABASE_PORT=27017` - `DATABASE_USERNAME=root` - `DATABASE_PASSWORD=database` """ ``` --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- ## PR Summary The pull request titled "feat: create Docker image, set up Docker CI" was submitted by the user sw5ciprl and is identified as number 528. The PR aims to establish a Docker image and configure Continuous Integration (CI) for Docker within the SpaceNinjaServer project. The description outlines a current issue with the setup, specifically that the entrypoint script employs a "dirty" sed scripting method to convert environment variables into entries in config.json. For further details, the pull request can be accessed at the following URL: [PR #528](https://github.com/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer/pull/528). ## Comments Summary The comments on the pull request primarily revolve around concerns regarding the handling of supplemental data and copyright issues. User Sainan expresses apprehension about distributing any potentially problematic data related to rights holders, emphasizing that the repository should not include such data. Sainan warns against providing a script that fetches external data while attempting to publish it, suggesting that this could lead to significant conflicts for the project. Sainan concludes that if these issues are not addressed with greater caution, it may be prudent to eliminate Docker from the project entirely. In response, sw5ciprl questions whether build config files themselves could be considered a violation of copyright, indicating a belief that only the binary cache might be actionable. This highlights a potential misunderstanding regarding the legal implications of including certain files in the repository. Sainan reiterates the importance of not incorporating any data that is not contained within the repository and strongly advises against attempting to publish any such data. This exchange underscores the need for careful consideration of copyright and data distribution practices in the context of the project’s development and deployment strategies. --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --><!-- commit_ids_reviewed_start --> <!-- 5492ca79a35b7e04105779a74fdd2fc171c732b0 --> <!-- bf47a40d97a64e4be017ebea8cb0966ec0b5776d --> <!-- 77ba3332393f3846ff6cd65fce3026f808559340 --> <!-- 62f9d27460a9f4ea2041f0c59353ede69f20bf4d --> <!-- c954ccd9b6c6aef1ad3c135d0a05fc47329b9585 --> <!-- commit_ids_reviewed_end --><!-- tips_start --> --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>❤️ Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>🪧 Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details> <!-- tips_end -->

Well, the thing is, we don't want to distribute anything that could potentially be an issue for the respective rights holders, hence why the supplemental data is not provided in the repository here.

I don't know how great it is if you provide a script that just fetches that data anyway — and then you also attempt to publish it? This may be a severe conflict for this project and a good reason to completely eliminate Docker from it if this is not handled with more care.

Well, the thing is, we don't want to distribute anything that could potentially be an issue for the respective rights holders, hence why the supplemental data is not provided in the repository here. I don't know how great it is if you provide a script that just fetches that data anyway — and then you also attempt to publish it? This may be a severe conflict for this project and a good reason to completely eliminate Docker from it if this is not handled with more care.
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-09 10:29:33 -07:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 13

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docker-compose.yml (1)

10-10: Remove trailing space

There's a trailing space on this line. While it doesn't affect functionality, removing it improves code consistency.

Remove the trailing space:

-      
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c31eb4b25 and 5492ca79a35b7e04105779a74fdd2fc171c732b0.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
  • docker-entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
docker-compose.yml

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
docker-compose.yml (2)

8-27: Well-documented environment variables

The commented-out environment variables provide excellent documentation for customization options. This approach allows users to easily understand and modify the configuration as needed.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining how to use these variables, e.g.:

# Uncomment and modify the following environment variables to customize the application behavior
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


29-31: Verify HTTPS configuration for exposed ports

Exposing ports 80 and 443 is standard for web applications. However, ensure that HTTPS is properly configured for port 443 to secure the communication.

Please confirm that HTTPS is correctly set up for the application. If not, consider adding appropriate SSL/TLS configuration.

.github/workflows/build.yml (3)

23-24: LGTM: Docker job setup looks good.

The new docker job is well-defined and uses the latest Ubuntu environment, which is a good practice for maintaining up-to-date and secure CI/CD pipelines.


26-27: LGTM: Docker buildx setup is appropriate.

Setting up Docker buildx is crucial for multi-platform builds. Using a specific version (v3) of the action ensures reproducibility.


28-33: LGTM with a note: Container registry login is correct, but verify image naming.

The login step is properly configured to use the GitHub Container Registry with secure authentication. However, please ensure that the image name in the next step (Build and push) matches the format required by ghcr.io, which should be ghcr.io/<owner>/<repo>.

To verify the correct image naming, please check the tags field in the next step.

docker-entrypoint.sh (1)

28-28: Verify the npm Command Execution

Ensure that the exec npm run "$@" command executes the intended NPM script with the provided arguments. If a specific script is to be run, specify it explicitly:

exec npm run start "$@"

Alternatively, if the intention is to pass all arguments to npm, use:

exec npm "$@"
Dockerfile (1)

30-30: Ensure docker-entrypoint.sh exists and is executable

The ENTRYPOINT points to /app/docker-entrypoint.sh. Ensure that this script:

  • Exists in the repository and is included during the build.
  • Has executable permissions.

If the script is missing or not executable, the container will fail to start.

Run the following script to verify the existence and permissions of docker-entrypoint.sh:

Verification successful

Verification Successful: docker-entrypoint.sh exists and is executable

The script docker-entrypoint.sh is present in the repository and has executable permissions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that 'docker-entrypoint.sh' exists in the codebase and is executable.

# Test: Find 'docker-entrypoint.sh' in the repository.
file_path=$(fd 'docker-entrypoint.sh')

if [ -z "$file_path" ]; then
  echo "'docker-entrypoint.sh' not found in the repository"
else
  if [ -x "$file_path" ]; then
    echo "'$file_path' exists and is executable"
  else
    echo "'$file_path' exists but is not executable"
  fi
fi

Length of output: 238

**Actionable comments posted: 13** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (1)</summary><blockquote> `10-10`: **Remove trailing space** There's a trailing space on this line. While it doesn't affect functionality, removing it improves code consistency. Remove the trailing space: ```diff - + ``` <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c31eb4b25b4f42168bb50193ebfb81c5452ce43 and 5492ca79a35b7e04105779a74fdd2fc171c732b0. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (4)</summary> * .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks) * Dockerfile (1 hunks) * docker-compose.yml (1 hunks) * docker-entrypoint.sh (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (7)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (2)</summary><blockquote> `8-27`: **Well-documented environment variables** The commented-out environment variables provide excellent documentation for customization options. This approach allows users to easily understand and modify the configuration as needed. Consider adding a brief comment explaining how to use these variables, e.g.: ```yaml # Uncomment and modify the following environment variables to customize the application behavior ``` <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `29-31`: **Verify HTTPS configuration for exposed ports** Exposing ports 80 and 443 is standard for web applications. However, ensure that HTTPS is properly configured for port 443 to secure the communication. Please confirm that HTTPS is correctly set up for the application. If not, consider adding appropriate SSL/TLS configuration. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/build.yml (3)</summary><blockquote> `23-24`: **LGTM: Docker job setup looks good.** The new `docker` job is well-defined and uses the latest Ubuntu environment, which is a good practice for maintaining up-to-date and secure CI/CD pipelines. --- `26-27`: **LGTM: Docker buildx setup is appropriate.** Setting up Docker buildx is crucial for multi-platform builds. Using a specific version (v3) of the action ensures reproducibility. --- `28-33`: **LGTM with a note: Container registry login is correct, but verify image naming.** The login step is properly configured to use the GitHub Container Registry with secure authentication. However, please ensure that the image name in the next step (Build and push) matches the format required by ghcr.io, which should be `ghcr.io/<owner>/<repo>`. To verify the correct image naming, please check the `tags` field in the next step. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docker-entrypoint.sh (1)</summary><blockquote> `28-28`: **Verify the npm Command Execution** Ensure that the `exec npm run "$@"` command executes the intended NPM script with the provided arguments. If a specific script is to be run, specify it explicitly: ```bash exec npm run start "$@" ``` Alternatively, if the intention is to pass all arguments to `npm`, use: ```bash exec npm "$@" ``` </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Dockerfile (1)</summary><blockquote> `30-30`: **Ensure `docker-entrypoint.sh` exists and is executable** The `ENTRYPOINT` points to `/app/docker-entrypoint.sh`. Ensure that this script: - Exists in the repository and is included during the build. - Has executable permissions. If the script is missing or not executable, the container will fail to start. Run the following script to verify the existence and permissions of `docker-entrypoint.sh`: <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> <!-- [monologue] [verification_task_1/1] [observations] - The shell script was executed to check for the existence and executability of `docker-entrypoint.sh`. - The output confirmed that `docker-entrypoint.sh` exists and is executable. [analysis] - The review comment's concerns have been fully addressed by the script's results. - No further verification is necessary as the script conclusively confirms the required conditions. [actions] - Conclude the verification process successfully without the need for additional scripts or actions. --> **Verification Successful: `docker-entrypoint.sh` exists and is executable** The script `docker-entrypoint.sh` is present in the repository and has executable permissions. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'docker-entrypoint.sh' exists in the codebase and is executable. # Test: Find 'docker-entrypoint.sh' in the repository. file_path=$(fd 'docker-entrypoint.sh') if [ -z "$file_path" ]; then echo "'docker-entrypoint.sh' not found in the repository" else if [ -x "$file_path" ]; then echo "'$file_path' exists and is executable" else echo "'$file_path' exists but is not executable" fi fi ``` Length of output: 238 </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
@ -19,4 +19,4 @@ jobs:
- run: cp config.json.example config.json
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:30 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Adjust image tagging and add checkout step.

While the multi-platform build and push configuration is good, there are a few issues to address:

  1. The image tags don't follow the ghcr.io format. They should be ghcr.io/<owner>/<repo>.
  2. The "latest" tag should be explicit.
  3. The repository name in the tag should match the GitHub repository name exactly (case-sensitive).
  4. There's no step to check out the repository, which is likely needed for the build context.

Please make the following changes:

  1. Add a checkout step at the beginning of the job:
- name: Checkout
  uses: actions/checkout@v4
  1. Update the tags field in the "Build and push" step:
tags: |
  ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:latest
  ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }}
  1. Consider adding a context field to specify the build context:
context: .

These changes will ensure correct image tagging and provide the necessary build context.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Adjust image tagging and add checkout step.** While the multi-platform build and push configuration is good, there are a few issues to address: 1. The image tags don't follow the ghcr.io format. They should be `ghcr.io/<owner>/<repo>`. 2. The "latest" tag should be explicit. 3. The repository name in the tag should match the GitHub repository name exactly (case-sensitive). 4. There's no step to check out the repository, which is likely needed for the build context. Please make the following changes: 1. Add a checkout step at the beginning of the job: ```yaml - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v4 ``` 2. Update the `tags` field in the "Build and push" step: ```yaml tags: | ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:latest ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }} ``` 3. Consider adding a `context` field to specify the build context: ```yaml context: . ``` These changes will ensure correct image tagging and provide the necessary build context. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:30 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding conditions for running the Docker job.

The new docker job is a valuable addition to the workflow. To optimize CI/CD pipeline efficiency, consider adding conditions to control when this job runs. For example:

docker:
  runs-on: ubuntu-latest
  if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
  # ... rest of the job configuration

This condition would run the Docker job only for pushes to the main branch, which is typically when you want to build and push new Docker images. Adjust the condition as needed based on your branching and release strategy.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider adding conditions for running the Docker job.** The new `docker` job is a valuable addition to the workflow. To optimize CI/CD pipeline efficiency, consider adding conditions to control when this job runs. For example: ```yaml docker: runs-on: ubuntu-latest if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' # ... rest of the job configuration ``` This condition would run the Docker job only for pushes to the main branch, which is typically when you want to build and push new Docker images. Adjust the condition as needed based on your branching and release strategy. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:31 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize the COPY instruction to reduce image size

Using COPY . /app copies the entire build context into the image, including unnecessary files like .git, local configurations, and other files not needed at runtime. This can increase the image size and potentially expose sensitive information.

Consider the following refinements:

  • Use a .dockerignore file to exclude unnecessary files and directories from the build context.
  • Copy only the necessary files required for the application to run.
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Optimize the COPY instruction to reduce image size** Using `COPY . /app` copies the entire build context into the image, including unnecessary files like `.git`, local configurations, and other files not needed at runtime. This can increase the image size and potentially expose sensitive information. Consider the following refinements: - Use a `.dockerignore` file to exclude unnecessary files and directories from the build context. - Copy only the necessary files required for the application to run. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:31 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid downloading external files during the build process

Downloading buildConfig.json from https://openwf.io during the build introduces several issues:

  • Build Reproducibility: The external resource may change or become unavailable, leading to inconsistent builds.
  • Security Risks: Introducing external dependencies can pose security vulnerabilities.
  • Contradicts PR Objectives: The PR aims to reduce references to openwf.io due to potential risks.

Consider these alternatives:

  • Include buildConfig.json directly in your source code repository.
  • Manage external dependencies through a controlled process or package manager.
_:warning: Potential issue_ **Avoid downloading external files during the build process** Downloading `buildConfig.json` from `https://openwf.io` during the build introduces several issues: - **Build Reproducibility**: The external resource may change or become unavailable, leading to inconsistent builds. - **Security Risks**: Introducing external dependencies can pose security vulnerabilities. - **Contradicts PR Objectives**: The PR aims to reduce references to `openwf.io` due to potential risks. Consider these alternatives: - Include `buildConfig.json` directly in your source code repository. - Manage external dependencies through a controlled process or package manager. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:31 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Leverage Docker caching for efficient builds

Combining multiple commands in a single RUN instruction can prevent Docker from caching layers effectively. This can lead to longer build times, especially when only a small part of the code changes.

Refactor the Dockerfile to optimize caching:

  1. Copy package.json and package-lock.json first.
  2. Run npm install to install dependencies.
  3. Copy the rest of the application code.
  4. Run npm run build.

Here's the suggested change:

 FROM node:18-alpine3.19

 WORKDIR /app

+COPY package*.json ./
+RUN npm install

+COPY . /app

-RUN apk add --no-cache bash wget jq; \
-    wget "https://openwf.io/supplementals/static%20data/buildConfig.json" -O "/app/static/data/buildConfig.json"; \
-    npm install; npm run build
+RUN apk add --no-cache bash jq
+RUN npm run build

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Leverage Docker caching for efficient builds** Combining multiple commands in a single `RUN` instruction can prevent Docker from caching layers effectively. This can lead to longer build times, especially when only a small part of the code changes. Refactor the Dockerfile to optimize caching: 1. Copy `package.json` and `package-lock.json` first. 2. Run `npm install` to install dependencies. 3. Copy the rest of the application code. 4. Run `npm run build`. Here's the suggested change: ```diff FROM node:18-alpine3.19 WORKDIR /app +COPY package*.json ./ +RUN npm install +COPY . /app -RUN apk add --no-cache bash wget jq; \ - wget "https://openwf.io/supplementals/static%20data/buildConfig.json" -O "/app/static/data/buildConfig.json"; \ - npm install; npm run build +RUN apk add --no-cache bash jq +RUN npm run build ``` > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -3,3 +21,3 @@
CMD ["mongod"]
RUN apk add --no-cache bash sed wget jq
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:31 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid hardcoding environment variables in the Dockerfile

Hardcoding environment variables reduces flexibility and requires rebuilding the image for configuration changes. It can also expose sensitive information if the image is shared publicly.

Recommendations:

  • Remove the ENV declarations from the Dockerfile.
  • Pass environment variables at runtime using:
    • Docker command-line arguments -e or --env-file.
    • Docker Compose environment section in docker-compose.yml.
    • Kubernetes ConfigMaps and Secrets.
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Avoid hardcoding environment variables in the Dockerfile** Hardcoding environment variables reduces flexibility and requires rebuilding the image for configuration changes. It can also expose sensitive information if the image is shared publicly. Recommendations: - Remove the `ENV` declarations from the Dockerfile. - Pass environment variables at runtime using: - Docker command-line arguments `-e` or `--env-file`. - Docker Compose `environment` section in `docker-compose.yml`. - Kubernetes ConfigMaps and Secrets. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:29 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve security for MongoDB configuration

While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them, it's still not ideal for production environments. Consider the following improvements:

  1. Use secrets management for sensitive information.
  2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application.
  3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application.

Here's an example of how to improve the configuration:

mongodb:
  image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble
  environment:
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password
  volumes:
    - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro
  secrets:
    - mongo_root_username
    - mongo_root_password

secrets:
  mongo_root_username:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt
  mongo_root_password:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt

Create a mongo-init.js file to set up a non-root user and database for the application.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve security for MongoDB configuration** While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them, it's still not ideal for production environments. Consider the following improvements: 1. Use secrets management for sensitive information. 2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application. 3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application. Here's an example of how to improve the configuration: ```yaml mongodb: image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble environment: MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password volumes: - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro secrets: - mongo_root_username - mongo_root_password secrets: mongo_root_username: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt mongo_root_password: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt ``` Create a `mongo-init.js` file to set up a non-root user and database for the application. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:30 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid hardcoding credentials in the MongoDB connection URL

Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments.

Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials:

environment:
-  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwf-db:spaceninjaserver:27017/
+  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/

Then, define MONGO_USER and MONGO_PASSWORD as environment variables or use a secrets management solution.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    environment:
      APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/
_:warning: Potential issue_ **Avoid hardcoding credentials in the MongoDB connection URL** Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments. Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials: ```diff environment: - APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwf-db:spaceninjaserver:27017/ + APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/ ``` Then, define `MONGO_USER` and `MONGO_PASSWORD` as environment variables or use a secrets management solution. <!-- suggestion_start --> <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion environment: APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/ ````` </details> <!-- suggestion_end --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -25,0 +20,4 @@
# APP_UNLOCK_ALL_QUESTS: true
# APP_COMPLETE_ALL_QUESTS: true
# APP_INFINITE_RESOURCES: true
# APP_UNLOCK_ALL_SHIP_FEATURES: true
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:30 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider using a specific image tag instead of latest

Using the latest tag for the openwf service image can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running. Consider using a specific tag or SHA digest for better version control and reproducibility.

Replace the latest tag with a specific version or SHA digest:

- image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest
+ image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha>

Also, consider keeping the build directive commented out for local development purposes.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  openwf:
    # build: .
    image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha>
_:warning: Potential issue_ **Consider using a specific image tag instead of `latest`** Using the `latest` tag for the `openwf` service image can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running. Consider using a specific tag or SHA digest for better version control and reproducibility. Replace the `latest` tag with a specific version or SHA digest: ```diff - image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest + image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha> ``` Also, consider keeping the `build` directive commented out for local development purposes. <!-- suggestion_start --> <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion openwf: # build: . image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha> ````` </details> <!-- suggestion_end --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:30 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Simplify and Correct Environment Variable Processing

The current method for processing environment variables is complex and may contain errors:

  • The use of ${config#,,} in line 16 is incorrect in Bash.
  • The series of sed commands make the code hard to read and maintain.
  • Using a for loop over command substitution can cause issues with environment variables containing spaces or special characters.

Consider simplifying the variable extraction and transformation:

  1. Use proper parameter expansion to remove the APP_ prefix:

    var="${config#APP_}"
    
  2. Convert from UPPER_SNAKE_CASE to camelCase using a function:

    to_camel_case() {
      echo "$1" | awk -F'_' '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){$i=tolower($i); if(i>1){$i=toupper(substr($i,1,1)) substr($i,2)}; printf "%s", $i}}'
    }
    var=$(to_camel_case "$var")
    
  3. Use a while loop to handle environment variables safely:

    env | grep "^APP_" | while IFS= read -r config; do
      # Process $config
    done
    

Alternatively, you can use jq to construct the JSON directly from the environment variables without manual string manipulation.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ _:warning: Potential issue_ **Simplify and Correct Environment Variable Processing** The current method for processing environment variables is complex and may contain errors: - The use of `${config#,,}` in line 16 is incorrect in Bash. - The series of `sed` commands make the code hard to read and maintain. - Using a `for` loop over command substitution can cause issues with environment variables containing spaces or special characters. Consider simplifying the variable extraction and transformation: 1. Use proper parameter expansion to remove the `APP_` prefix: ```bash var="${config#APP_}" ``` 2. Convert from `UPPER_SNAKE_CASE` to `camelCase` using a function: ```bash to_camel_case() { echo "$1" | awk -F'_' '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){$i=tolower($i); if(i>1){$i=toupper(substr($i,1,1)) substr($i,2)}; printf "%s", $i}}' } var=$(to_camel_case "$var") ``` 3. Use a `while` loop to handle environment variables safely: ```bash env | grep "^APP_" | while IFS= read -r config; do # Process $config done ``` Alternatively, you can use `jq` to construct the JSON directly from the environment variables without manual string manipulation. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:30 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Parameterize External URLs and Add Error Handling

Hardcoding the URL https://openwf.io reduces flexibility and may pose risks. Consider making the base URL configurable:

BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"}

Update the wget command:

wget -q "${BASE_URL}/H.Cache_${version}.bin" -O "/app/static/data/H.Cache_${version}.bin"

Also, add error handling to ensure buildConfig.json exists and the version variable is properly extracted:

# Check if buildConfig.json exists
if [ ! -f /app/static/data/buildConfig.json ]; then
  echo "Error: buildConfig.json not found!"
  exit 1
fi

version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json)

# Validate that version is not empty
if [ -z "$version" ]; then
  echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!"
  exit 1
fi
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ _:warning: Potential issue_ **Parameterize External URLs and Add Error Handling** Hardcoding the URL `https://openwf.io` reduces flexibility and may pose risks. Consider making the base URL configurable: ```bash BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"} ``` Update the `wget` command: ```bash wget -q "${BASE_URL}/H.Cache_${version}.bin" -O "/app/static/data/H.Cache_${version}.bin" ``` Also, add error handling to ensure `buildConfig.json` exists and the `version` variable is properly extracted: ```bash # Check if buildConfig.json exists if [ ! -f /app/static/data/buildConfig.json ]; then echo "Error: buildConfig.json not found!" exit 1 fi version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json) # Validate that version is not empty if [ -z "$version" ]; then echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!" exit 1 fi ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -0,0 +15,4 @@
do
var=$(echo "${config}" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed 's/app_//g' | sed -E 's/_([a-z])/\U\1/g' | sed 's/=.*//g')
val=$(echo "${config}" | sed 's/.*=//g')
jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] += $value' config.json > config.tmp
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:29:30 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure Correct Data Types When Updating JSON

All values from environment variables are being added as strings. If the values represent numbers, booleans, or JSON objects, they should be correctly typed in config.json. Modify the jq command to parse the values appropriately:

jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = ($value | try fromjson catch $value)' config.json > config.tmp

This attempts to parse $value as JSON (handling numbers, booleans, objects), and falls back to a string if parsing fails.


⚠️ Potential issue

Use Correct Assignment Operator in jq

Using += in the jq command may not behave as intended when setting values. The += operator is used for adding to arrays or concatenating strings. To assign a value to a key, use the = operator:

-jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] += $value' config.json > config.tmp
+jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = $value' config.json > config.tmp

This ensures the key in config.json is set correctly to the desired value.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = $value' config.json > config.tmp
_:warning: Potential issue_ **Ensure Correct Data Types When Updating JSON** All values from environment variables are being added as strings. If the values represent numbers, booleans, or JSON objects, they should be correctly typed in `config.json`. Modify the `jq` command to parse the values appropriately: ```bash jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = ($value | try fromjson catch $value)' config.json > config.tmp ``` This attempts to parse `$value` as JSON (handling numbers, booleans, objects), and falls back to a string if parsing fails. --- _:warning: Potential issue_ **Use Correct Assignment Operator in jq** Using `+=` in the `jq` command may not behave as intended when setting values. The `+=` operator is used for adding to arrays or concatenating strings. To assign a value to a key, use the `=` operator: ```diff -jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] += $value' config.json > config.tmp +jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = $value' config.json > config.tmp ``` This ensures the key in `config.json` is set correctly to the desired value. <!-- suggestion_start --> <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = $value' config.json > config.tmp ````` </details> <!-- suggestion_end --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-09 10:38:48 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I don't know how great it is if you provide a script that just fetches that data anyway — and then you also attempt to publish it?

Are build config files themselves a violation of copyright? I was under the impression that only the binary cache was actionable.

> I don't know how great it is if you provide a script that just fetches that data anyway — and then you also attempt to publish it? Are build config files themselves a violation of copyright? I was under the impression that only the binary cache was actionable.

Don't pull in any data that's not in this repository. Don't attempt to publish any data.

Don't pull in any data that's not in this repository. Don't attempt to publish any data.
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-09 10:59:22 -07:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docker-entrypoint.sh (1)

29-29: Consider adding flexibility to the npm command

While using exec is correct, the hardcoded npm run dev command limits flexibility.

Consider allowing the npm command to be configurable:

NPM_COMMAND=${NPM_COMMAND:-"run dev"}
exec npm $NPM_COMMAND

This change would allow different npm scripts to be run based on an environment variable, increasing the versatility of the Docker image.

.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

23-42: Overall LGTM with considerations: Docker CI setup and data handling.

The addition of the docker job to the workflow successfully implements the Docker CI setup as per the PR objectives. The configuration is well-structured and follows best practices for Docker image building and publishing.

However, there are important considerations not directly addressed in this workflow file:

  1. Data Handling: The PR comments raise concerns about copyright issues and the distribution of potentially problematic data. While this workflow file doesn't directly handle data, it's crucial to ensure that the Docker build process doesn't include any copyrighted or sensitive data in the image.

  2. Build Config: The PR objectives mention issues with buildConfig.json and image versioning. Consider reviewing how this file is handled in the Docker build process and whether the current tagging strategy (using commit SHA) is sufficient.

  3. Entrypoint Script: The PR objectives note concerns about the entrypoint script using sed for environment variable conversion. This should be reviewed in the Dockerfile or entrypoint script, which are not visible in this workflow file.

To address these concerns:

  1. Review the Dockerfile to ensure it doesn't copy or include any potentially copyrighted or sensitive data.
  2. Consider implementing a more robust versioning strategy for the Docker images, possibly incorporating semantic versioning.
  3. Evaluate the entrypoint script's approach to handling configuration and consider more robust alternatives to sed scripting for environment variable handling.

These considerations will help ensure that the Docker CI setup not only works technically but also aligns with legal and best practice requirements for data handling and configuration management.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5492ca79a35b7e04105779a74fdd2fc171c732b0 and bf47a40d97a64e4be017ebea8cb0966ec0b5776d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • docker-entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .dockerignore
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
docker-entrypoint.sh (3)

1-12: LGTM: Good initialization and basic config setup

The script starts with proper error handling using set -e, and the initial configuration file is created correctly with basic logger settings.


23-27: LGTM: Proper check for buildConfig.json

The script correctly checks for the existence of the required buildConfig.json file and exits with an appropriate error message if it's not found. This is good practice for ensuring the container has the necessary configuration before proceeding.


14-21: ⚠️ Potential issue

Simplify and correct environment variable processing

The current method for processing environment variables is overly complex and prone to errors:

  1. The use of command substitution with for can break with spaces or special characters in variable names or values.
  2. The series of sed commands is hard to read and maintain.
  3. The jq command uses += instead of = for setting values.

Consider implementing the following improvements:

  1. Use a while loop to safely process environment variables:

    env | grep "^APP_" | while IFS='=' read -r name value; do
      # Process $name and $value
    done
    
  2. Simplify the variable name transformation:

    var=$(echo "${name#APP_}" | awk -F'_' '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){$i=tolower($i); if(i>1){$i=toupper(substr($i,1,1)) substr($i,2)}; printf "%s", $i}}')
    var=${var,}  # Ensure first character is lowercase
    
  3. Use the correct assignment operator in jq and handle data types:

    jq --arg key "$var" --arg val "$value" '.[$key] = ($val | try fromjson catch $val)' config.json > config.tmp
    

These changes will make the script more robust and easier to maintain.

.github/workflows/build.yml (3)

23-25: LGTM: Docker job structure and conditions.

The new docker job is well-structured and addresses previous review comments:

  1. It's conditioned to run only on pushes to the main branch, optimizing CI/CD efficiency.
  2. The job runs on ubuntu-latest, which is appropriate for Docker operations.

These changes align with best practices for Docker CI workflows.


27-28: LGTM: Docker buildx setup.

The use of docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 is appropriate for enabling multi-platform builds. The action version is current, which is good for maintaining compatibility and security.


29-34: LGTM: Container registry login configuration.

The login step is correctly configured:

  1. It uses the latest version of docker/login-action.
  2. It's set up for GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io).
  3. It securely uses the GitHub actor and GITHUB_TOKEN for authentication.

This configuration ensures secure and proper access to the container registry.

Dockerfile (2)

6-6: Verify the necessity of installed packages

The command RUN apk add --no-cache bash wget jq installs bash, wget, and jq. Please confirm whether all of these packages are essential for your application to run within the container. Unnecessary packages can increase the image size and potentially introduce security vulnerabilities.


28-28: Ensure the entrypoint script is correctly set up

The ENTRYPOINT is set to "/app/docker-entrypoint.sh". Please verify that:

  • The script exists at the specified path.
  • It has execute permissions (chmod +x docker-entrypoint.sh).
  • It begins with a proper shebang line (e.g., #!/bin/bash or #!/bin/sh).
  • It securely and correctly handles environment variables and any necessary initialization.
**Actionable comments posted: 2** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-entrypoint.sh (1)</summary><blockquote> `29-29`: **Consider adding flexibility to the npm command** While using `exec` is correct, the hardcoded `npm run dev` command limits flexibility. Consider allowing the npm command to be configurable: ```bash NPM_COMMAND=${NPM_COMMAND:-"run dev"} exec npm $NPM_COMMAND ``` This change would allow different npm scripts to be run based on an environment variable, increasing the versatility of the Docker image. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/build.yml (1)</summary><blockquote> `23-42`: **Overall LGTM with considerations: Docker CI setup and data handling.** The addition of the `docker` job to the workflow successfully implements the Docker CI setup as per the PR objectives. The configuration is well-structured and follows best practices for Docker image building and publishing. However, there are important considerations not directly addressed in this workflow file: 1. Data Handling: The PR comments raise concerns about copyright issues and the distribution of potentially problematic data. While this workflow file doesn't directly handle data, it's crucial to ensure that the Docker build process doesn't include any copyrighted or sensitive data in the image. 2. Build Config: The PR objectives mention issues with `buildConfig.json` and image versioning. Consider reviewing how this file is handled in the Docker build process and whether the current tagging strategy (using commit SHA) is sufficient. 3. Entrypoint Script: The PR objectives note concerns about the entrypoint script using sed for environment variable conversion. This should be reviewed in the Dockerfile or entrypoint script, which are not visible in this workflow file. To address these concerns: 1. Review the Dockerfile to ensure it doesn't copy or include any potentially copyrighted or sensitive data. 2. Consider implementing a more robust versioning strategy for the Docker images, possibly incorporating semantic versioning. 3. Evaluate the entrypoint script's approach to handling configuration and consider more robust alternatives to sed scripting for environment variable handling. These considerations will help ensure that the Docker CI setup not only works technically but also aligns with legal and best practice requirements for data handling and configuration management. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5492ca79a35b7e04105779a74fdd2fc171c732b0 and bf47a40d97a64e4be017ebea8cb0966ec0b5776d. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (4)</summary> * .dockerignore (1 hunks) * .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks) * Dockerfile (1 hunks) * docker-entrypoint.sh (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)</summary> * .dockerignore </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (8)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-entrypoint.sh (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-12`: **LGTM: Good initialization and basic config setup** The script starts with proper error handling using `set -e`, and the initial configuration file is created correctly with basic logger settings. --- `23-27`: **LGTM: Proper check for buildConfig.json** The script correctly checks for the existence of the required `buildConfig.json` file and exits with an appropriate error message if it's not found. This is good practice for ensuring the container has the necessary configuration before proceeding. --- `14-21`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Simplify and correct environment variable processing** The current method for processing environment variables is overly complex and prone to errors: 1. The use of command substitution with `for` can break with spaces or special characters in variable names or values. 2. The series of `sed` commands is hard to read and maintain. 3. The `jq` command uses `+=` instead of `=` for setting values. Consider implementing the following improvements: 1. Use a `while` loop to safely process environment variables: ```bash env | grep "^APP_" | while IFS='=' read -r name value; do # Process $name and $value done ``` 2. Simplify the variable name transformation: ```bash var=$(echo "${name#APP_}" | awk -F'_' '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){$i=tolower($i); if(i>1){$i=toupper(substr($i,1,1)) substr($i,2)}; printf "%s", $i}}') var=${var,} # Ensure first character is lowercase ``` 3. Use the correct assignment operator in `jq` and handle data types: ```bash jq --arg key "$var" --arg val "$value" '.[$key] = ($val | try fromjson catch $val)' config.json > config.tmp ``` These changes will make the script more robust and easier to maintain. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/build.yml (3)</summary><blockquote> `23-25`: **LGTM: Docker job structure and conditions.** The new `docker` job is well-structured and addresses previous review comments: 1. It's conditioned to run only on pushes to the main branch, optimizing CI/CD efficiency. 2. The job runs on `ubuntu-latest`, which is appropriate for Docker operations. These changes align with best practices for Docker CI workflows. --- `27-28`: **LGTM: Docker buildx setup.** The use of `docker/setup-buildx-action@v3` is appropriate for enabling multi-platform builds. The action version is current, which is good for maintaining compatibility and security. --- `29-34`: **LGTM: Container registry login configuration.** The login step is correctly configured: 1. It uses the latest version of `docker/login-action`. 2. It's set up for GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io). 3. It securely uses the GitHub actor and GITHUB_TOKEN for authentication. This configuration ensures secure and proper access to the container registry. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Dockerfile (2)</summary><blockquote> `6-6`: **Verify the necessity of installed packages** The command `RUN apk add --no-cache bash wget jq` installs `bash`, `wget`, and `jq`. Please confirm whether all of these packages are essential for your application to run within the container. Unnecessary packages can increase the image size and potentially introduce security vulnerabilities. --- `28-28`: **Ensure the entrypoint script is correctly set up** The `ENTRYPOINT` is set to `"/app/docker-entrypoint.sh"`. Please verify that: - The script exists at the specified path. - It has execute permissions (`chmod +x docker-entrypoint.sh`). - It begins with a proper shebang line (e.g., `#!/bin/bash` or `#!/bin/sh`). - It securely and correctly handles environment variables and any necessary initialization. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 10:59:21 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Missing Supplemental Data Handling in docker-entrypoint.sh

The docker-entrypoint.sh script does not implement the required logic to download or handle supplemental data as specified in the PR objectives. This omission needs to be addressed to ensure proper configuration setup.

🔗 Analysis chain

Address missing functionality for supplemental data handling

The current script doesn't include any logic for downloading or handling supplemental data, which was mentioned in the PR objectives. This omission might be related to the copyright concerns raised in the PR comments.

If the decision is made to include the supplemental data handling:

  1. Implement the downloading functionality with proper error handling.
  2. Parameterize the external URLs as suggested in the past review:
    BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"}
    
  3. Add version extraction from buildConfig.json with error handling:
    version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json)
    if [ -z "$version" ]; then
      echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!"
      exit 1
    fi
    

However, given the copyright concerns, it's crucial to verify the legal implications of including this functionality. Consider the following script to check for any potentially problematic files or URLs in the codebase:

This will help identify any remaining references to external data sources or large binary files that might need to be addressed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for potentially problematic URLs or file references:"
rg -i 'openwf\.io|\.bin'
echo "Checking for large binary files that might be data caches:"
find . -type f -size +1M

Length of output: 89975

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ _:warning: Potential issue_ **Missing Supplemental Data Handling in docker-entrypoint.sh** The `docker-entrypoint.sh` script does not implement the required logic to download or handle supplemental data as specified in the PR objectives. This omission needs to be addressed to ensure proper configuration setup. <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **Address missing functionality for supplemental data handling** The current script doesn't include any logic for downloading or handling supplemental data, which was mentioned in the PR objectives. This omission might be related to the copyright concerns raised in the PR comments. If the decision is made to include the supplemental data handling: 1. Implement the downloading functionality with proper error handling. 2. Parameterize the external URLs as suggested in the past review: ```bash BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"} ``` 3. Add version extraction from `buildConfig.json` with error handling: ```bash version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json) if [ -z "$version" ]; then echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!" exit 1 fi ``` However, given the copyright concerns, it's crucial to verify the legal implications of including this functionality. Consider the following script to check for any potentially problematic files or URLs in the codebase: This will help identify any remaining references to external data sources or large binary files that might need to be addressed. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash echo "Searching for potentially problematic URLs or file references:" rg -i 'openwf\.io|\.bin' echo "Checking for large binary files that might be data caches:" find . -type f -size +1M ``` Length of output: 89975 </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-09 11:02:28 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Image is now standalone, requiring static data to be mounted. Environment variable processing could be improved with future PR (preferably, loading configuration options directly from environment).

Image is now standalone, requiring static data to be mounted. Environment variable processing could be improved with future PR (preferably, loading configuration options directly from environment).
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-09 11:05:04 -07:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docker-compose.yml (1)

10-10: Remove trailing spaces

There are trailing spaces on this line, which can cause issues with some YAML parsers.

Remove the trailing spaces from this line:

-      
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf47a40d97a64e4be017ebea8cb0966ec0b5776d and 77ba3332393f3846ff6cd65fce3026f808559340.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
docker-compose.yml

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
docker-compose.yml (3)

2-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

Consider using a specific image tag instead of latest

Using the latest tag for the openwf service image can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running.

Replace the latest tag with a specific version or SHA digest:

- image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest
+ image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha>

Also, consider keeping the build directive commented out for local development purposes.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


5-6: ⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid hardcoding credentials in the MongoDB connection URL

Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments.

Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials:

environment:
-  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwf-db:spaceninjaserver:27017/
+  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/

Then, define MONGO_USER and MONGO_PASSWORD as environment variables or use a secrets management solution.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


29-30: Review the contents of the static-data volume

Mounting the ./static-data directory into the container at /app/static/data could potentially expose sensitive information if the directory contains any proprietary or copyrighted data.

Please review the contents of the ./static-data directory to ensure it doesn't contain any sensitive or copyrighted information that shouldn't be distributed.

If the directory contains sensitive data, consider using a .dockerignore file to exclude specific files or subdirectories from being copied into the image.

Verification successful

Static-data volume is empty or does not exist

Upon verification, the ./static-data directory does not exist, meaning no data is being mounted into the container. Therefore, there is no risk of exposing sensitive information through this volume.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List contents of static-data directory
echo "Contents of ./static-data:"
ls -R ./static-data

Length of output: 145

**Actionable comments posted: 2** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (1)</summary><blockquote> `10-10`: **Remove trailing spaces** There are trailing spaces on this line, which can cause issues with some YAML parsers. Remove the trailing spaces from this line: ```diff - + ``` <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf47a40d97a64e4be017ebea8cb0966ec0b5776d and 77ba3332393f3846ff6cd65fce3026f808559340. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * docker-compose.yml (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (3)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (3)</summary><blockquote> `2-4`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Consider using a specific image tag instead of `latest`** Using the `latest` tag for the `openwf` service image can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running. Replace the `latest` tag with a specific version or SHA digest: ```diff - image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest + image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha> ``` Also, consider keeping the `build` directive commented out for local development purposes. > Likely invalid or redundant comment. --- `5-6`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Avoid hardcoding credentials in the MongoDB connection URL** Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments. Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials: ```diff environment: - APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwf-db:spaceninjaserver:27017/ + APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/ ``` Then, define `MONGO_USER` and `MONGO_PASSWORD` as environment variables or use a secrets management solution. > Likely invalid or redundant comment. --- `29-30`: **Review the contents of the static-data volume** Mounting the `./static-data` directory into the container at `/app/static/data` could potentially expose sensitive information if the directory contains any proprietary or copyrighted data. Please review the contents of the `./static-data` directory to ensure it doesn't contain any sensitive or copyrighted information that shouldn't be distributed. If the directory contains sensitive data, consider using a `.dockerignore` file to exclude specific files or subdirectories from being copied into the image. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> <!-- [monologue] [task verification_1/1] [observations] - The shell script intended to list the contents of `./static-data` resulted in an error indicating that the directory does not exist. - If the directory does not exist, Docker typically creates an empty directory for the volume mount, which means no data is being exposed. [analysis] - The absence of the `./static-data` directory suggests that either it is not needed, not created yet, or managed elsewhere. - Since the directory isn't present, there's no risk of exposing sensitive information through this volume mount at this time. [actions] - Conclude that the mount does not expose any sensitive data. - Categorize the verification as successful. --> **Static-data volume is empty or does not exist** Upon verification, the `./static-data` directory does not exist, meaning no data is being mounted into the container. Therefore, there is no risk of exposing sensitive information through this volume. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # List contents of static-data directory echo "Contents of ./static-data:" ls -R ./static-data ``` Length of output: 145 </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-09 11:05:04 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve security for MongoDB configuration and correct volume mount

While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them, it's still not ideal for production environments. Additionally, the volume mount path is incorrect for MongoDB.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Use secrets management for sensitive information.
  2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application.
  3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application.
  4. Correct the volume mount path for MongoDB data.

Here's an example of how to improve the configuration:

mongodb:
  image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble
  environment:
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password
  volumes:
    - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro
    - ./database:/data/db
  secrets:
    - mongo_root_username
    - mongo_root_password

secrets:
  mongo_root_username:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt
  mongo_root_password:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt

Create a mongo-init.js file to set up a non-root user and database for the application:

db.createUser({
  user: 'appuser',
  pwd: 'apppassword',
  roles: [{ role: 'readWrite', db: 'openwf' }]
});

Update the APP_MONGODB_URL in the openwf service to use the new user and database:

APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://appuser:apppassword@mongodb:27017/openwf

These changes will significantly improve the security of your MongoDB setup and correct the volume mount path.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve security for MongoDB configuration and correct volume mount** While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them, it's still not ideal for production environments. Additionally, the volume mount path is incorrect for MongoDB. Consider the following improvements: 1. Use secrets management for sensitive information. 2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application. 3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application. 4. Correct the volume mount path for MongoDB data. Here's an example of how to improve the configuration: ```yaml mongodb: image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble environment: MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password volumes: - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro - ./database:/data/db secrets: - mongo_root_username - mongo_root_password secrets: mongo_root_username: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt mongo_root_password: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt ``` Create a `mongo-init.js` file to set up a non-root user and database for the application: ```javascript db.createUser({ user: 'appuser', pwd: 'apppassword', roles: [{ role: 'readWrite', db: 'openwf' }] }); ``` Update the `APP_MONGODB_URL` in the `openwf` service to use the new user and database: ```yaml APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://appuser:apppassword@mongodb:27017/openwf ``` These changes will significantly improve the security of your MongoDB setup and correct the volume mount path. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-10 10:44:25 -07:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 10

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docker-compose.yml (1)

10-10: Remove trailing spaces

There are trailing spaces on this line, which can cause issues with some YAML parsers.

Remove the trailing spaces from this line:

-      
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77ba3332393f3846ff6cd65fce3026f808559340 and 62f9d27460.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • .env.example (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
  • docker-entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .env.example
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .dockerignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
docker-compose.yml

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
docker-entrypoint.sh (2)

1-3: LGTM: Proper script initialization

The script starts with the correct shebang and uses set -e to exit immediately if a command fails, which is a good practice for error handling in shell scripts.


22-26: ⚠️ Potential issue

Address missing functionality for supplemental data handling

While checking for buildConfig.json is good, the script doesn't implement the required logic to download or handle supplemental data as specified in the PR objectives.

Consider adding the following:

  1. Implement the downloading functionality with proper error handling.
  2. Parameterize the external URLs:
    BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"}
    
  3. Add version extraction from buildConfig.json with error handling:
    version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json)
    if [ -z "$version" ]; then
      echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!" >&2
      exit 1
    fi
    

However, given the copyright concerns mentioned in the PR comments, it's crucial to verify the legal implications of including this functionality. Run the following script to check for any potentially problematic files or URLs in the codebase:

This will help identify any remaining references to external data sources or large binary files that might need to be addressed.

Verification successful

Implement Supplemental Data Handling Functionality

The verification completed successfully. No large binary files or problematic URLs were found in the codebase.

Action Required:

  • Implement Supplemental Data Handling:
    1. Download Functionality: Add logic to download necessary supplemental data with proper error handling.
    2. Parameterize External URLs:
      BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"}
      
    3. Version Extraction:
      version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json)
      if [ -z "$version" ]; then
        echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!" >&2
        exit 1
      fi
      
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for potentially problematic URLs or file references:"
rg -i 'openwf\.io|\.bin'
echo "Checking for large binary files that might be data caches:"
find . -type f -size +1M

Length of output: 89975

docker-compose.yml (2)

2-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

Use a specific image tag instead of latest

Using the latest tag for the openwf service image can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running.

Replace the latest tag with a specific version or SHA digest:

- image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest
+ image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha>

Also, consider keeping the build directive commented out for local development purposes.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


29-30: Review the volume mount path for static data

The current volume mount path for static data seems incorrect. It's mounting a local static-data directory to /app/static/data in the container, which might not be the correct path for the application's static data.

Please verify the correct path for static data in the container and update the volume mount accordingly. You can use the following command to check the directory structure inside the container:

.github/workflows/build.yml (3)

23-25: LGTM: Well-defined Docker job with appropriate conditions.

The new docker job is correctly defined and includes a condition to run only on pushes to the main branch. This aligns with best practices for Docker image builds and addresses the suggestion from a previous review.


27-28: LGTM: Proper setup for Docker buildx.

The step correctly sets up Docker buildx using the latest version of the action, which is necessary for the multi-platform build in the subsequent steps.


29-34: LGTM: Secure login to GitHub Container Registry.

The step correctly configures login to ghcr.io using the latest version of the login action. The use of ${{ github.actor }} for the username and ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} for the password follows security best practices.

**Actionable comments posted: 10** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (1)</summary><blockquote> `10-10`: **Remove trailing spaces** There are trailing spaces on this line, which can cause issues with some YAML parsers. Remove the trailing spaces from this line: ```diff - + ``` <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77ba3332393f3846ff6cd65fce3026f808559340 and 62f9d27460a9f4ea2041f0c59353ede69f20bf4d. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (7)</summary> * .dockerignore (1 hunks) * .env.example (0 hunks) * .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks) * .gitignore (1 hunks) * Dockerfile (1 hunks) * docker-compose.yml (1 hunks) * docker-entrypoint.sh (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)</summary> * .env.example </details> <details> <summary>✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)</summary> * .gitignore </details> <details> <summary>🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)</summary> * .dockerignore </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (7)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-entrypoint.sh (2)</summary><blockquote> `1-3`: **LGTM: Proper script initialization** The script starts with the correct shebang and uses `set -e` to exit immediately if a command fails, which is a good practice for error handling in shell scripts. --- `22-26`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Address missing functionality for supplemental data handling** While checking for `buildConfig.json` is good, the script doesn't implement the required logic to download or handle supplemental data as specified in the PR objectives. Consider adding the following: 1. Implement the downloading functionality with proper error handling. 2. Parameterize the external URLs: ```bash BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"} ``` 3. Add version extraction from `buildConfig.json` with error handling: ```bash version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json) if [ -z "$version" ]; then echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!" >&2 exit 1 fi ``` However, given the copyright concerns mentioned in the PR comments, it's crucial to verify the legal implications of including this functionality. Run the following script to check for any potentially problematic files or URLs in the codebase: This will help identify any remaining references to external data sources or large binary files that might need to be addressed. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> <!-- [monologue] [task verification_1/1] Analyze the shell script results to verify the review concerns regarding the absence of supplemental data handling and potential copyright issues. [observations] - The provided shell script executed two commands: 1. `rg -i 'openwf\.io|\.bin'` searched for references to 'openwf.io' or '.bin' files. 2. `find . -type f -size +1M` checked for large binary files exceeding 1MB. - The output indicates no findings for large binary files, as there was no output after the `find` command. - The `rg` command output shows a snippet of JavaScript code but does not indicate any matches for 'openwf.io' or '.bin'. [analysis] - Since the `find` command returned no large binary files, there are no current data caches that might pose issues. - The `rg` command did not find references to 'openwf.io' or '.bin', suggesting no problematic URLs or file references are present. - This verification alleviates the immediate concerns about including supplemental data handling without infringing on copyrights. - However, the original review comment pointed out that the script does not implement the required logic to handle supplemental data, which is still an unresolved issue. [actions] - Proceed to address the missing functionality for supplemental data handling since no immediate issues have been found. - Recommend implementing the downloading functionality, parameterizing external URLs, and extracting version information as previously suggested. - Ensure that the new functionality adheres to any licensing or copyright requirements. --> **Implement Supplemental Data Handling Functionality** The verification completed successfully. No large binary files or problematic URLs were found in the codebase. **Action Required:** - **Implement Supplemental Data Handling:** 1. **Download Functionality:** Add logic to download necessary supplemental data with proper error handling. 2. **Parameterize External URLs:** ```bash BASE_URL=${BASE_URL:-"https://default-url.com/supplementals/static%20data"} ``` 3. **Version Extraction:** ```bash version=$(jq -r .version /app/static/data/buildConfig.json) if [ -z "$version" ]; then echo "Error: Version not found in buildConfig.json!" >&2 exit 1 fi ``` </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash echo "Searching for potentially problematic URLs or file references:" rg -i 'openwf\.io|\.bin' echo "Checking for large binary files that might be data caches:" find . -type f -size +1M ``` Length of output: 89975 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (2)</summary><blockquote> `2-4`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Use a specific image tag instead of `latest`** Using the `latest` tag for the `openwf` service image can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running. Replace the `latest` tag with a specific version or SHA digest: ```diff - image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest + image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha> ``` Also, consider keeping the `build` directive commented out for local development purposes. > Likely invalid or redundant comment. --- `29-30`: **Review the volume mount path for static data** The current volume mount path for static data seems incorrect. It's mounting a local `static-data` directory to `/app/static/data` in the container, which might not be the correct path for the application's static data. Please verify the correct path for static data in the container and update the volume mount accordingly. You can use the following command to check the directory structure inside the container: </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/build.yml (3)</summary><blockquote> `23-25`: **LGTM: Well-defined Docker job with appropriate conditions.** The new `docker` job is correctly defined and includes a condition to run only on pushes to the main branch. This aligns with best practices for Docker image builds and addresses the suggestion from a previous review. --- `27-28`: **LGTM: Proper setup for Docker buildx.** The step correctly sets up Docker buildx using the latest version of the action, which is necessary for the multi-platform build in the subsequent steps. --- `29-34`: **LGTM: Secure login to GitHub Container Registry.** The step correctly configures login to ghcr.io using the latest version of the login action. The use of `${{ github.actor }}` for the username and `${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}` for the password follows security best practices. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
@ -19,4 +19,4 @@ jobs:
- run: cp config.json.example config.json
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:24 -07:00

💡 Codebase verification

Action Required: Add a Checkout Step to the Workflow

The build and push step is missing a checkout step. Please add a checkout step before the build and push step to ensure the repository code is available for the Docker build process.

- name: Checkout
  uses: actions/checkout@v4
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM with a minor concern: Build and push configuration.

The build and push step is well-configured:

  1. It uses the latest version of docker/build-push-action.
  2. Multi-platform build for amd64 and arm64 is set up, enhancing deployment flexibility.
  3. The tagging strategy follows best practices, using both 'latest' and the commit SHA.

However, there's one potential issue:

There's no explicit checkout step before this build step. While some actions automatically check out the repository, it's generally safer to include an explicit checkout step to ensure the correct code is available for the build context.

Consider adding a checkout step at the beginning of the job:

- name: Checkout
  uses: actions/checkout@v4

This will ensure that the correct code is available for the Docker build process.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if a checkout step exists in the docker job

# Test: Search for a checkout step in the docker job
if grep -A 10 "docker:" .github/workflows/build.yml | grep -q "uses: actions/checkout@"; then
    echo "Checkout step found in the docker job."
else
    echo "No checkout step found in the docker job."
fi

Length of output: 177

_:bulb: Codebase verification_ **Action Required: Add a Checkout Step to the Workflow** The build and push step is missing a checkout step. Please add a checkout step before the build and push step to ensure the repository code is available for the Docker build process. ```yaml - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v4 ``` <details> <summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary> **LGTM with a minor concern: Build and push configuration.** The build and push step is well-configured: 1. It uses the latest version of `docker/build-push-action`. 2. Multi-platform build for amd64 and arm64 is set up, enhancing deployment flexibility. 3. The tagging strategy follows best practices, using both 'latest' and the commit SHA. However, there's one potential issue: There's no explicit checkout step before this build step. While some actions automatically check out the repository, it's generally safer to include an explicit checkout step to ensure the correct code is available for the build context. Consider adding a checkout step at the beginning of the job: ```yaml - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v4 ``` This will ensure that the correct code is available for the Docker build process. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if a checkout step exists in the docker job # Test: Search for a checkout step in the docker job if grep -A 10 "docker:" .github/workflows/build.yml | grep -q "uses: actions/checkout@"; then echo "Checkout step found in the docker job." else echo "No checkout step found in the docker job." fi ``` Length of output: 177 </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -1,5 +1,28 @@
FROM mongo as base
FROM node:18-alpine3.19
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:24 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider pinning the base image to a specific digest for reproducible builds

Using node:18-alpine3.19 without a specific digest can lead to inconsistencies if the base image is updated upstream. Pinning the image to a specific digest ensures that your builds are reproducible and not affected by upstream changes.

For example:

-FROM node:18-alpine3.19
+FROM node@sha256:<digest>

Replace <digest> with the actual digest of the image version you have tested.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider pinning the base image to a specific digest for reproducible builds** Using `node:18-alpine3.19` without a specific digest can lead to inconsistencies if the base image is updated upstream. Pinning the image to a specific digest ensures that your builds are reproducible and not affected by upstream changes. For example: ```diff -FROM node:18-alpine3.19 +FROM node@sha256:<digest> ``` Replace `<digest>` with the actual digest of the image version you have tested. > Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -6,0 +24,4 @@
COPY . /app
WORKDIR /app
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:24 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Minimize the number of installed packages to reduce image size and attack surface

Installing additional packages like bash, sed, wget, and jq increases the image size and the potential attack surface. Consider the following:

  • Use Alpine's default shell ash: Since Alpine Linux uses ash by default, scripts can often be adapted to work without bash.
  • Avoid unnecessary tools: If possible, use shell built-ins or existing tools within the base image to replace sed, wget, and jq.
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Minimize the number of installed packages to reduce image size and attack surface** Installing additional packages like `bash`, `sed`, `wget`, and `jq` increases the image size and the potential attack surface. Consider the following: - **Use Alpine's default shell `ash`**: Since Alpine Linux uses `ash` by default, scripts can often be adapted to work without `bash`. - **Avoid unnecessary tools**: If possible, use shell built-ins or existing tools within the base image to replace `sed`, `wget`, and `jq`. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:24 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure the entrypoint script has executable permissions

When copying files into the image, the execute permission may not be preserved, which can cause the container to fail at runtime. Add a chmod command to set the correct permissions:

 COPY . /app
 WORKDIR /app

+RUN chmod +x /app/docker-entrypoint.sh

 ENTRYPOINT ["/app/docker-entrypoint.sh"]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

COPY . /app
WORKDIR /app

RUN chmod +x /app/docker-entrypoint.sh

ENTRYPOINT ["/app/docker-entrypoint.sh"]
_:warning: Potential issue_ **Ensure the entrypoint script has executable permissions** When copying files into the image, the execute permission may not be preserved, which can cause the container to fail at runtime. Add a `chmod` command to set the correct permissions: ```diff COPY . /app WORKDIR /app +RUN chmod +x /app/docker-entrypoint.sh ENTRYPOINT ["/app/docker-entrypoint.sh"] ``` <!-- suggestion_start --> <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion COPY . /app WORKDIR /app RUN chmod +x /app/docker-entrypoint.sh ENTRYPOINT ["/app/docker-entrypoint.sh"] ````` </details> <!-- suggestion_end --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:24 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve security for MongoDB configuration and correct volume mount

While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them, it's still not ideal for production environments. Additionally, the volume mount path is incorrect for MongoDB.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Use secrets management for sensitive information.
  2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application.
  3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application.
  4. Correct the volume mount path for MongoDB data.

Here's an example of how to improve the configuration:

mongodb:
  image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble
  environment:
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password
  volumes:
    - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro
    - ./database:/data/db
  secrets:
    - mongo_root_username
    - mongo_root_password

secrets:
  mongo_root_username:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt
  mongo_root_password:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt

Create a mongo-init.js file to set up a non-root user and database for the application:

db.createUser({
  user: 'appuser',
  pwd: 'apppassword',
  roles: [{ role: 'readWrite', db: 'openwf' }]
});

Update the APP_MONGODB_URL in the openwf service to use the new user and database:

APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://appuser:apppassword@mongodb:27017/openwf

These changes will significantly improve the security of your MongoDB setup and correct the volume mount path.

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve security for MongoDB configuration and correct volume mount** While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them, it's still not ideal for production environments. Additionally, the volume mount path is incorrect for MongoDB. Consider the following improvements: 1. Use secrets management for sensitive information. 2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application. 3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application. 4. Correct the volume mount path for MongoDB data. Here's an example of how to improve the configuration: ```yaml mongodb: image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble environment: MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password volumes: - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro - ./database:/data/db secrets: - mongo_root_username - mongo_root_password secrets: mongo_root_username: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt mongo_root_password: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt ``` Create a `mongo-init.js` file to set up a non-root user and database for the application: ```javascript db.createUser({ user: 'appuser', pwd: 'apppassword', roles: [{ role: 'readWrite', db: 'openwf' }] }); ``` Update the `APP_MONGODB_URL` in the `openwf` service to use the new user and database: ```yaml APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://appuser:apppassword@mongodb:27017/openwf ``` These changes will significantly improve the security of your MongoDB setup and correct the volume mount path. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -25,0 +22,4 @@
# APP_INFINITE_RESOURCES: true
# APP_UNLOCK_ALL_SHIP_FEATURES: true
# APP_UNLOCK_ALL_SHIP_DECORATIONS: true
# APP_UNLOCK_ALL_FLAVOUR_ITEMS: true
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:24 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve security for MongoDB connection URL

Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments.

Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials:

environment:
-  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwfagent:spaceninjaserver@mongodb:27017/
+  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB}

Then, define MONGO_USER, MONGO_PASSWORD, and MONGO_DB as environment variables or use a secrets management solution.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    environment:
      APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB}
_:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve security for MongoDB connection URL** Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments. Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials: ```diff environment: - APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwfagent:spaceninjaserver@mongodb:27017/ + APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB} ``` Then, define `MONGO_USER`, `MONGO_PASSWORD`, and `MONGO_DB` as environment variables or use a secrets management solution. <!-- suggestion_start --> <details> <summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary> > ‼️ **IMPORTANT** > Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. `````suggestion environment: APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB} ````` </details> <!-- suggestion_end --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -0,0 +10,4 @@
}
}
' > config.json
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:23 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a template file for initial configuration

While the current approach works, using a separate template file for the initial config.json could improve maintainability and flexibility. This would allow easier updates to the base configuration without modifying the script.

Consider creating a config.template.json file and using it as follows:

cp /app/config.template.json config.json

This approach separates configuration from logic, making it easier to manage different environments or configuration versions.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider using a template file for initial configuration** While the current approach works, using a separate template file for the initial `config.json` could improve maintainability and flexibility. This would allow easier updates to the base configuration without modifying the script. Consider creating a `config.template.json` file and using it as follows: ```bash cp /app/config.template.json config.json ``` This approach separates configuration from logic, making it easier to manage different environments or configuration versions. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -0,0 +17,4 @@
val=$(echo "${config}" | sed 's/.*=//g')
jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] += $value' config.json > config.tmp
mv config.tmp config.json
done
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:23 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Simplify and improve environment variable processing

The current implementation has several areas for improvement:

  1. The variable name transformation is complex and hard to maintain.
  2. The use of += in jq might not work as intended for all data types.
  3. There's no error handling for the jq command.
  4. The approach doesn't handle complex data types well.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Simplify variable name transformation:

    var=$(echo "${config%%=*}" | sed 's/^APP_//; s/_\([a-z]\)/\U\1/g; s/^./\L&/')
    
  2. Use = instead of += in jq and add error handling:

    if ! jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = ($value | try fromjson catch $value)' config.json > config.tmp; then
      echo "Error updating config.json" >&2
      exit 1
    fi
    
  3. Handle complex data types:

    val=$(echo "${config#*=}" | jq -R 'try fromjson catch .')
    

These changes will make the script more robust and easier to maintain.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ _:warning: Potential issue_ **Simplify and improve environment variable processing** The current implementation has several areas for improvement: 1. The variable name transformation is complex and hard to maintain. 2. The use of `+=` in jq might not work as intended for all data types. 3. There's no error handling for the jq command. 4. The approach doesn't handle complex data types well. Consider the following improvements: 1. Simplify variable name transformation: ```bash var=$(echo "${config%%=*}" | sed 's/^APP_//; s/_\([a-z]\)/\U\1/g; s/^./\L&/') ``` 2. Use `=` instead of `+=` in jq and add error handling: ```bash if ! jq --arg variable "$var" --arg value "$val" '.[$variable] = ($value | try fromjson catch $value)' config.json > config.tmp; then echo "Error updating config.json" >&2 exit 1 fi ``` 3. Handle complex data types: ```bash val=$(echo "${config#*=}" | jq -R 'try fromjson catch .') ``` These changes will make the script more robust and easier to maintain. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
@ -0,0 +26,4 @@
fi
npm install
exec npm run dev
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 10:44:24 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize application startup process

While the current startup process works, there are a couple of improvements that could be made:

  1. Running npm install in the entrypoint script is not ideal for production environments. It can slow down container startup and may introduce inconsistencies.
  2. The script doesn't distinguish between development and production environments.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Move npm install to the Dockerfile:

    COPY package*.json ./
    RUN npm ci --only=production
    
  2. Use environment variables to determine the startup command:

    if [ "$NODE_ENV" = "production" ]; then
      exec npm start
    else
      exec npm run dev
    fi
    

These changes will make the container startup faster and more consistent across environments.

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Optimize application startup process** While the current startup process works, there are a couple of improvements that could be made: 1. Running `npm install` in the entrypoint script is not ideal for production environments. It can slow down container startup and may introduce inconsistencies. 2. The script doesn't distinguish between development and production environments. Consider the following improvements: 1. Move `npm install` to the Dockerfile: ```dockerfile COPY package*.json ./ RUN npm ci --only=production ``` 2. Use environment variables to determine the startup command: ```bash if [ "$NODE_ENV" = "production" ]; then exec npm start else exec npm run dev fi ``` These changes will make the container startup faster and more consistent across environments. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-10 11:28:10 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@coderabbitai pause

@coderabbitai pause

What, you don't think an AI constantly spouting nonsense at you is a great experience for collaborators? smh.

What, you don't think an AI constantly spouting nonsense at you is a great experience for collaborators? smh.
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-10-10 11:32:52 -07:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docker-compose.yml (1)

10-10: Fix minor formatting issues

There are two minor formatting issues in the file:

  1. There are trailing spaces on line 10. Please remove them.
  2. There's no newline character at the end of the file. Add a newline at the end of the file.

These changes will improve the overall consistency of the file and adhere to common YAML formatting practices.

Also applies to: 43-43

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62f9d27460 and c954ccd9b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .dockerignore
  • .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
docker-compose.yml

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
docker-compose.yml (2)

5-6: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve security for MongoDB connection URL

Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments. Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials:

environment:
-  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwfagent:spaceninjaserver@mongodb:27017/
+  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB}

Then, define MONGO_USER, MONGO_PASSWORD, and MONGO_DB as environment variables or use a secrets management solution.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


2-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a specific image tag and clarify the build directive

While using an image from GitHub Container Registry is good, the latest tag can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running. Consider using a specific tag or SHA digest for better version control and reproducibility.

- image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest
+ image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha>

Additionally, the commented-out build directive could be useful for local development. Consider adding a comment explaining when to use the build directive versus the image directive.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

**Actionable comments posted: 2** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (1)</summary><blockquote> `10-10`: **Fix minor formatting issues** There are two minor formatting issues in the file: 1. There are trailing spaces on line 10. Please remove them. 2. There's no newline character at the end of the file. Add a newline at the end of the file. These changes will improve the overall consistency of the file and adhere to common YAML formatting practices. Also applies to: 43-43 <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62f9d27460a9f4ea2041f0c59353ede69f20bf4d and c954ccd9b6c6aef1ad3c135d0a05fc47329b9585. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (3)</summary> * .dockerignore (1 hunks) * .gitignore (1 hunks) * docker-compose.yml (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)</summary> * .dockerignore * .gitignore </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) --- [error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file (new-line-at-end-of-file) </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>docker-compose.yml (2)</summary><blockquote> `5-6`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve security for MongoDB connection URL** Hardcoding credentials in the connection URL poses a security risk and makes it difficult to manage different environments. Consider using environment variables for the MongoDB credentials: ```diff environment: - APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://openwfagent:spaceninjaserver@mongodb:27017/ + APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB} ``` Then, define `MONGO_USER`, `MONGO_PASSWORD`, and `MONGO_DB` as environment variables or use a secrets management solution. > Likely invalid or redundant comment. --- `2-4`: _:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider using a specific image tag and clarify the build directive** While using an image from GitHub Container Registry is good, the `latest` tag can lead to unexpected behavior and make it difficult to track which version of the application is running. Consider using a specific tag or SHA digest for better version control and reproducibility. ```diff - image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:latest + image: ghcr.io/spaceninjaserver/SpaceNinjaServer:<specific-version-or-sha> ``` Additionally, the commented-out `build` directive could be useful for local development. Consider adding a comment explaining when to use the `build` directive versus the `image` directive. > Likely invalid or redundant comment. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 11:32:52 -07:00

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve security for MongoDB configuration

While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them in the connection string, it's still not ideal for production environments. Consider the following improvements:

  1. Use secrets management for sensitive information.
  2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application.
  3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application.

Here's an example of how to improve the configuration:

mongodb:
  image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble
  environment:
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username
    MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password
  volumes:
    - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro
    - ./data/database:/data/db
  secrets:
    - mongo_root_username
    - mongo_root_password

secrets:
  mongo_root_username:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt
  mongo_root_password:
    file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt

Create a mongo-init.js file to set up a non-root user and database for the application:

db.createUser({
  user: 'appuser',
  pwd: 'apppassword',
  roles: [{ role: 'readWrite', db: 'openwf' }]
});

Update the APP_MONGODB_URL in the openwf service to use the new user and database:

APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://appuser:apppassword@mongodb:27017/openwf

These changes will significantly improve the security of your MongoDB setup.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

_:warning: Potential issue_ **Improve security for MongoDB configuration** While using environment variables for MongoDB credentials is better than hardcoding them in the connection string, it's still not ideal for production environments. Consider the following improvements: 1. Use secrets management for sensitive information. 2. Implement authentication using a non-root user for the application. 3. Enable MongoDB authentication and use a separate database for the application. Here's an example of how to improve the configuration: ```yaml mongodb: image: docker.io/library/mongo:8.0.0-noble environment: MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_username MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE: /run/secrets/mongo_root_password volumes: - ./mongo-init.js:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/mongo-init.js:ro - ./data/database:/data/db secrets: - mongo_root_username - mongo_root_password secrets: mongo_root_username: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_username.txt mongo_root_password: file: ./secrets/mongo_root_password.txt ``` Create a `mongo-init.js` file to set up a non-root user and database for the application: ```javascript db.createUser({ user: 'appuser', pwd: 'apppassword', roles: [{ role: 'readWrite', db: 'openwf' }] }); ``` Update the `APP_MONGODB_URL` in the `openwf` service to use the new user and database: ```yaml APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://appuser:apppassword@mongodb:27017/openwf ``` These changes will significantly improve the security of your MongoDB setup. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file (new-line-at-end-of-file) </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-10-10 11:32:51 -07:00

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider moving commented environment variables to a separate file

While these commented environment variables provide useful information, they clutter the docker-compose file and make it harder to read and maintain. Consider moving these variables to a separate .env.example file:

  1. Create a new file named .env.example in the same directory as your docker-compose.yml.
  2. Move all the commented environment variables to this new file.
  3. In the docker-compose.yml, replace the commented variables with:
environment:
  APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB}
  # Other non-default environment variables
env_file:
  - .env
  1. Create a .env file for actual configuration:
cp .env.example .env

This approach keeps your docker-compose.yml clean while still providing examples for configuration.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider moving commented environment variables to a separate file** While these commented environment variables provide useful information, they clutter the docker-compose file and make it harder to read and maintain. Consider moving these variables to a separate `.env.example` file: 1. Create a new file named `.env.example` in the same directory as your `docker-compose.yml`. 2. Move all the commented environment variables to this new file. 3. In the `docker-compose.yml`, replace the commented variables with: ```yaml environment: APP_MONGODB_URL: mongodb://${MONGO_USER}:${MONGO_PASSWORD}@mongodb:27017/${MONGO_DB} # Other non-default environment variables env_file: - .env ``` 4. Create a `.env` file for actual configuration: ``` cp .env.example .env ``` This approach keeps your `docker-compose.yml` clean while still providing examples for configuration. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 10-10: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces) </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-10-10 11:32:56 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Actions performed

Reviews paused.

<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit --> <details> <summary>:white_check_mark: Actions performed</summary> Reviews paused. </details>
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-10 11:49:45 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

What, you don't think an AI constantly spouting nonsense at you is a great experience for collaborators? smh.

It is sometimes helpful, however not for the scope of this PR. Please review.

> What, you don't think an AI constantly spouting nonsense at you is a great experience for collaborators? smh. It is sometimes helpful, however not for the scope of this PR. Please review.

Well, from what I can tell, your env vars like APP_INFINITE_RESOURCES are hooked up to nothing.

Well, from what I can tell, your env vars like `APP_INFINITE_RESOURCES` are hooked up to nothing.
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-10 12:08:33 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Environment variables are expanded on startup and a config.json file is created from them. The image is built with a set of default environment variables which can be overridden by the user, for example in docker-compose.yml.

Environment variables are expanded on [startup](https://github.com/sw5ciprl/SpaceNinjaServer/blob/c954ccd9b6c6aef1ad3c135d0a05fc47329b9585/docker-entrypoint.sh#L14-L20) and a config.json file is created from them. The image is built with a set of [default environment variables](https://github.com/sw5ciprl/SpaceNinjaServer/blob/c954ccd9b6c6aef1ad3c135d0a05fc47329b9585/Dockerfile#L3-L21) which can be overridden by the user, for example in [docker-compose.yml](https://github.com/sw5ciprl/SpaceNinjaServer/blob/c954ccd9b6c6aef1ad3c135d0a05fc47329b9585/docker-compose.yml#L8-L28).

You will still need to remove the Github workflow, tho, it's not going to work in this repository.

You will still need to remove the Github workflow, tho, it's not going to work in this repository.
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-10 12:31:19 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Why? It will build images on commit to main branch and push them to the GitHub Container Registry, available to users. These images just hold a copy of the source code, nothing more.

Why? It will build images on commit to main branch and push them to the GitHub Container Registry, available to users. These images just hold a copy of the source code, nothing more.

Nevermind, I saw it was being skipped and thought it was broken. Could you move it into its own workflow file so that you can make it on: push: ["main"] instead of this hacky approach?

Nevermind, I saw it was being skipped and thought it was broken. Could you move it into its own workflow file so that you can make it `on: push: ["main"]` instead of this hacky approach?

You're letting it run on pull_request is that intended?

You're letting it run on `pull_request` is that intended?
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-10 12:39:38 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

You're letting it run on pull_request is that intended?

It was not, apologies.

> You're letting it run on `pull_request` is that intended? It was not, apologies.

Looks fine to me now, but for posterity's sake, is there a way the "data" folder can be renamed? I can imagine such a generic name being in the .gitignore could be a serious headache in the future.

Looks fine to me now, but for posterity's sake, is there a way the "data" folder can be renamed? I can imagine such a generic name being in the .gitignore could be a serious headache in the future.
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-10 12:48:01 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

/data was added to gitignore for convenience, so that it wouldn't show up as unstaged during development/use. However renaming it is probably a good idea.

/data was added to gitignore for convenience, so that it wouldn't show up as unstaged during development/use. However renaming it is probably a good idea.
sw5ciprl commented 2024-10-10 12:59:25 -07:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Messy commits. Please squash when merging.

Messy commits. Please squash when merging.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.