OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer
21
23
Fork 29
Code Issues 21 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Activity

Disruption using the wrong rotations #2599

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-08-08 17:30:31 -07:00 by Sainan · 7 comments
Sainan commented 2025-08-08 17:30:31 -07:00
Owner
Copy Link

Currently, we use the AABC pattern here, which is obviously incorrect.

We'd need some mission logs from disruption runs so we can correlate the request data with the intended rotations.

Currently, we use the AABC pattern here, which is obviously incorrect. We'd need some mission logs from disruption runs so we can correlate the request data with the intended rotations.
Sainan added the
question
bug
 labels 2025-08-08 17:30:31 -07:00
Sainan added
help wanted
 and removed
question
 labels 2025-08-08 17:34:03 -07:00
Slayer55555 commented 2025-08-08 19:20:48 -07:00
Copy Link

Disruption does not follow the traditional 'AABC' rotation for endless missions. The reward tier is determined by both round progression and round performance, i.e. the number of conduits successfully defended.

Round 1 conduit defended 2 conduits defended 3 conduits defended 4 conduits defended
1 A A A B
2 A A B B
3 A B B C
4+ B B C C

5 waves completed, this should work

Disruption does not follow the traditional 'AABC' rotation for endless missions. The reward tier is determined by both round progression and round performance, i.e. the number of conduits successfully defended. Round 1 conduit defended 2 conduits defended 3 conduits defended 4 conduits defended 1 A A A B 2 A A B B 3 A B B C 4+ B B C C 5 waves completed, this should work
Sainan commented 2025-08-08 19:23:05 -07:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

lol, wrong log. either way would not be useful without knowing how you performed in each round.

lol, wrong log. either way would not be useful without knowing how you performed in each round.
Slayer55555 commented 2025-08-08 19:41:22 -07:00
Copy Link

which log is it??

all waves with all conduits defended

which log is it?? all waves with all conduits defended
Animan8000 commented 2025-08-08 22:40:18 -07:00
Contributor
Copy Link

which log is it??

all waves with all conduits defended

Server log of course. Mission report

> which log is it?? > > all waves with all conduits defended Server log of course. Mission report
Slayer55555 commented 2025-08-09 00:03:07 -07:00
Copy Link

do you need it from live or from sns?
if live i have no idea where to get that

do you need it from live or from sns? if live i have no idea where to get that
Animan8000 commented 2025-08-09 00:05:38 -07:00
Contributor
Copy Link

SNS of course

SNS of course
Sainan commented 2025-08-10 18:20:00 -07:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Just did 3-4-4 so A-B-C according to the matrix; it seems rewardTierOverrides is used to indicate this:

 RewardInfo: {
    node: 'SolNode87',
    rewardTier: 0,
    nightmareMode: false,
    useVaultManifest: false,
    EnemyCachesFound: 0,
    toxinOk: true,
    lostTargetWave: 0,
    defenseTargetCount: 1,
    EOM_AFK: 0,
    RewardQualificationsActivityTracker: [
      {
        ActivePctLow: 0.936802,
        ActivePctMedium: 0.914353,
        ActivePctHigh: 0.360231
      },
      {
        ActivePctLow: 0.985609,
        ActivePctMedium: 0.916287,
        ActivePctHigh: 0.316924
      },
      {
        ActivePctLow: 1,
        ActivePctMedium: 0.998149,
        ActivePctHigh: 0.388627
      }
    ],
    rewardQualifications: '111',
    PurgatoryRewardQualifications: '',
    rewardTierOverrides: [ 0, 1, 2 ],
    rewardSeed: -1035604005566918780n
  },
Just did 3-4-4 so A-B-C according to the matrix; it seems `rewardTierOverrides` is used to indicate this: ``` RewardInfo: { node: 'SolNode87', rewardTier: 0, nightmareMode: false, useVaultManifest: false, EnemyCachesFound: 0, toxinOk: true, lostTargetWave: 0, defenseTargetCount: 1, EOM_AFK: 0, RewardQualificationsActivityTracker: [ { ActivePctLow: 0.936802, ActivePctMedium: 0.914353, ActivePctHigh: 0.360231 }, { ActivePctLow: 0.985609, ActivePctMedium: 0.916287, ActivePctHigh: 0.316924 }, { ActivePctLow: 1, ActivePctMedium: 0.998149, ActivePctHigh: 0.388627 } ], rewardQualifications: '111', PurgatoryRewardQualifications: '', rewardTierOverrides: [ 0, 1, 2 ], rewardSeed: -1035604005566918780n }, ```
Sainan removed the
help wanted
 label 2025-08-10 18:20:22 -07:00
Sainan added the
pr'd for
 label 2025-08-10 18:25:38 -07:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
An existing implemention is incorrect
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
enhancement
New feature or request specific to the emulator
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
improvement
missing data
part of more major rehaul
Can't be worked on right now without merge conflicts later
pr'd for
Soon™
question
Further information is requested
unimplemented
you can do this
Considered easy enough for someone's first PR.
No Label
bug
pr'd for
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: OpenWF/SpaceNinjaServer#2599
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?